Sordid

Lives in Austria Vienna, Austria
Works as a CCNA
Joined on Aug 2, 2010

Comments

Total: 161, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Google working on RAW imaging for Android (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: That would be awesome. Barrel distortion correction for face is just ridiculously bad on some phones. It would be nice if Adobe did a lens profile on the popular smartphones such as galaxy note 3, note 2, s4, s3, etc. That and the extra bit depth would want to me me actually attempt some descent photography.

My expectations? I have none!
It's a smartphone. It's made for phone calls and information over the Internet.
It's nice that they can take quite usable pictures in good sunlight but people here sound like they were about to replace cameras. They aren't.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 07:53 UTC
On article Google working on RAW imaging for Android (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: That would be awesome. Barrel distortion correction for face is just ridiculously bad on some phones. It would be nice if Adobe did a lens profile on the popular smartphones such as galaxy note 3, note 2, s4, s3, etc. That and the extra bit depth would want to me me actually attempt some descent photography.

The Nokia samples are indeed terrible.
My ancient point and shoot makes better pictures.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 07:34 UTC
On article Google working on RAW imaging for Android (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

brecklundin: Given the way Google feels about Adobe...what are the odds they will even use DNG instead my cash is on a new "Google Standard" RAW....beta of course....screw Google. Once they were fine then they got stockholders and stopped being inventive and customer oriented.

Blah.
Google is without any doubt still among the most innovative companies in the world.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 07:32 UTC
On article Google working on RAW imaging for Android (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: That would be awesome. Barrel distortion correction for face is just ridiculously bad on some phones. It would be nice if Adobe did a lens profile on the popular smartphones such as galaxy note 3, note 2, s4, s3, etc. That and the extra bit depth would want to me me actually attempt some descent photography.

You'll still be shooting with a ridiculously tiny sensor so you'll have some wonderfully noisy extra bit depth.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2013 at 15:13 UTC
On article Google working on RAW imaging for Android (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

Goodmeme: I hope they provide option for Adobe raw which is already open-source AFAIK. Why reinvent the wheel, when a universal wheel has already been designed?

Hu? Compression?

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2013 at 15:05 UTC
On article Google working on RAW imaging for Android (84 comments in total)

Yay! So finally, we can process those crappy pictures made with microscopically tiny sensors in RAW! Long overdue!
I hope this doesn't break the overly abused retrovintagehipstercrapster filters.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2013 at 09:23 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1392 comments in total)

Gosh, this is exciting!
I hope it does have some craptastic Instahipsterjunkfilters built in, to make a useless product even more useless.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 08:39 UTC as 96th comment
On article iON announces tiny rugged HD video camera (43 comments in total)
In reply to:

OneGuy: You label it a gopro killer based on company marketing release? You are not connecting with me and I'm not connecting with you

It's labeled "MAY BE a GoPro killer".

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 08:52 UTC
On article Canon EOS 70D Review (723 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vegasus: Dear Dpreview, When you say, complicated wifi setup, is that the same with dos 6D?

So... It indeed IS complicated for you, Henry?

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 13:16 UTC
On article Canon EOS 70D Review (723 comments in total)
In reply to:

photofan1986: "Score" "Dxo"' blah blah...I really wonder how many of you really compared the actual IQ instead of just relying on Dxo figures. I also wonder how we managed to go out and shoot before Dxo!

Dxo is simply benchmarking and measuring equipment.
They don't need to be able to produce a good sensor, it's not their business.
And yes, Dxo IS the authority in terms of benchmarking sensors and lenses.

Do I make purchasing decision based solely on their results?
Of course not. Ergonomics are important to me. General image quality is, which includes a lot more than just the measurable resolution. But then again, I wouldn't buy a camera that scores a whole lot worse than its competitors either.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 11:31 UTC
On article First Impressions Review: Using the Canon PowerShot G16 (353 comments in total)
In reply to:

camerosity: The Nikon P7700 is much better, now the P7800 even better. Sorry Canon.

Unfortunately, Sony spanks them both.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 07:03 UTC
On article 'Rising Waters' documents Superstorm Sandy devastation (29 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: great images! I shot a short video with the Sony RX100 the day after in NYC
https://vimeo.com/52568721

Dude! Woah! Great job and thanks a lot for sharing.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 06:52 UTC
On article 'Rising Waters' documents Superstorm Sandy devastation (29 comments in total)
In reply to:

inevitable crafts studio: strangly overprocessed, i didnt noticed sandy or any other storm in the US, they dont really cover that on the news in europe.
i guess its bad because of their wooden houses in the states.

from the photos it doesnt shock me, looks like some sort of highwater

Hu?
Sandy was covered everywhere in Europe. In TV, radio, newspapers, online.
I was in Austria, Germany and Hungary around the time Sandy hit the US and it was in the news everywhere.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 06:50 UTC
Total: 161, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »