wootpile

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Dec 6, 2011

Comments

Total: 194, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

wootpile: It's funny how a lot of people comment on this camera without understanding the tech/design/expected rendition of it, nor what it is for, or what type of photographer will be using it.

I'm sure lots of folks have been waiting for Fuji to go this big and it looks like a very nice product, made by a fine company that understands more about photography/photographers than the whole staff of Canon and Nikon bunched together.
Congratulations to the market who WILL be using it.

notpc Would you ask me to explain the totality of cosmos too?

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 05:08 UTC
In reply to:

Kamox: Remember to apply Fujifilm skin care product to your models when taking picture of them, in order to extract maximum detail from this camera.
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/skincare/

See, this is why we love Fuji.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 17:15 UTC

It's funny how a lot of people comment on this camera without understanding the tech/design/expected rendition of it, nor what it is for, or what type of photographer will be using it.

I'm sure lots of folks have been waiting for Fuji to go this big and it looks like a very nice product, made by a fine company that understands more about photography/photographers than the whole staff of Canon and Nikon bunched together.
Congratulations to the market who WILL be using it.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 17:10 UTC as 18th comment | 6 replies

One of the best articles I've read on Dpreview.
Informative, interesting, pointy, short and well-written!

I can't understand why Samsung left the market when they did. It was shameful, the way they did it, but that's ok, that's corporate agenda.. but why they did it... that still confuses.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 06:35 UTC as 118th comment

It's a nice idea but too bulky for my taste. Can't see myself lugging it around a whole day as a city tourist even if it weighs little, Best of luck to them but often on kickstarter & fund me sites I can't help but wonder if the designers are just doing it for themselves or if they actually did any user-research before starting their projects.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2016 at 06:18 UTC as 8th comment
On article Samyang teases 'summer blockbuster' lens announcements (124 comments in total)
In reply to:

ddd - rrr: Not to be TOO much of a "wet blanket" here, but Samyang has a problem that, at least to this point, has not been resolved in my experience. While their lenses are often both brilliant in design and also relatively very inexpensive compared with other brands, their manufacturing inconsistency is notorious. I now avoid Samyang (and their rebranded versions, such as Rokinon, etc.) unless a lens is desirable enough for me to go through several samples to find a good one (as many as six of them with one lens I bought, and three with another - and with the latter, I "settled" for an imperfect one that served well enough for its intended purpose). I tried two samples of a third lens before giving up on it (the first sample was terrible, the second was good except in the lower right corner, but both had unacceptable levels of CA, so I gave up on trying to find a better sample of that lens). More is here in my MFT-Lenses reviews:
http://www.david-ruether-photography.com/MFT-Lenses.htm
--DR

The consolation is that Sony has even worse quality control of the FE lenses. Of the 5 that I had (bought new, not second-hand) only 1 was good, the other 4 required multiple buys in order to secure versions with agreeable quality. I ended up buying returning buying 13 lenses in order to find 5 that were as they ought to be. that's an awful waste of time and resources. the others had various quite significant faults 1 the AF stopped working, 5 were substantially misaligned, 1 had clearly visible dust between elements, the rest never had the sharpness to be expected. The consumer zooms you can't expect too much sharpness, but these had misalignments = soddy on one side. Regardless of price-range / type - this should never be put to market. The only Sony lens that performed as expected out of the 1:st box was the FE 24 1.8

So, bottom line, Samyang may have QC issues but not any more than one of the giants trying to convince its users their gear is worth so much more.

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2016 at 08:26 UTC

I've never had a foevon but seriously considering. Correct me if wrong here: the SD 1 has 3 x 15 sensor, but this new one has 19 + 5 +5. Since the merril has more red and green pixels wouldn't it be close/better resolution /detail depending on color of the subject photographed? Aslo, what about B&W. I can't see myself only shooting blue values, obsiously there's interpolation but supposing price isn't a problem,why they've turned from having 3x equal sensors to having 1 + 2 that have so many less pixels on the same area? Dumb questions maybe but I've never dug into foeven

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2016 at 11:41 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

Here's the lesson in this: regardless of if your camera/sensor (or film if doing legacy) has deep or shallow dynamic range, make sure to expose for the right middle tones to maximize your potential to manipulate at will. Capture soft & mellow images what many call "flat", save the contrast for post process. I hear people say "bleh.. just shoot raw".. well raw can't capture that which is outside the dynamic range of your equipment - that´s where the photographer´s judgement comes in. That, imho, is what Ansel was best at, capturing the right data onto the film to be able to perform art in the darkroom.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2016 at 11:26 UTC as 22nd comment | 4 replies
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1196 comments in total)

Whot?! No flipscreen?

:p

Nice size on it though!

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:02 UTC as 211th comment | 1 reply
On article Hasselblad to announce 'game changer' next week (460 comments in total)

hahah I found it!
http://www.alpa.ch/en/site/workarounds

(thanks to gesture for link)

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 05:16 UTC as 50th comment
On article Hasselblad to announce 'game changer' next week (460 comments in total)

More wooden grips!

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2016 at 11:05 UTC as 68th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Kiwisnap: Sizes do not go large enough for wearing over layers in winter. Especially for Americans.

I always knew Americans were a different breed ;)

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 06:33 UTC
On article Making a splash: Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

eno2: This is the best Nikon camera to date!

lol

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 15:13 UTC
On article Making a splash: Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery (228 comments in total)

Images look good.. but not excellent. Considering the several-year-gap between d300 and this d500, I'm not seeing anything that gets my pulse going. I sold my Sony recently and have been considering a return to the Nikon family but at this pricepoint I would have liked to see a lot more IQ-wise. The functionality is there, all the features I would want, but the IQ (of the samples and what I've seen elsewhere) is on par with the Fuji xT1 and the a6000 I had. Sony's problem is lack of glass - on the other hand - focus is always spot on since it's a mirrorless. Hard decisions :)

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 15:13 UTC as 53rd comment | 1 reply
On article Samsung NX500 shown as discontinued (273 comments in total)
In reply to:

wootpile: Bleh, I'll never buy a Samsung camera out of principle after how they tricked tens of thousands into believing they were in it in a grand scale.

I understand pulling out of a market if you can't afford to stay fight and perhaps even conquer it, but Samsung has more financial clout than even Sony, a market presence as big as Apple, and the tech to do it all in-house without breaking a sweat.

Samsung promise isn't worth a cent. Shame on you.

Yes. It gives me great pleasure.

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2016 at 15:44 UTC
On article Samsung NX500 shown as discontinued (273 comments in total)

Bleh, I'll never buy a Samsung camera out of principle after how they tricked tens of thousands into believing they were in it in a grand scale.

I understand pulling out of a market if you can't afford to stay fight and perhaps even conquer it, but Samsung has more financial clout than even Sony, a market presence as big as Apple, and the tech to do it all in-house without breaking a sweat.

Samsung promise isn't worth a cent. Shame on you.

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2016 at 06:25 UTC as 41st comment | 3 replies

Wake me up when the replacement to the real Coolpix "A" arrives.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 07:08 UTC as 7th comment
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (617 comments in total)

Congrats Pentaxians! Good to see a Pentax revival. I am almost tempted just for the sake of going (un-adapted!) FF again with my old legacy primes

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 06:54 UTC as 54th comment
In reply to:

wootpile: PLEASE offer it on SONY E also

Agreed, but it will be very much lighter package than mounted on a nikon d500, canon 80d, etc. The size of the camera you attach doesn't matter - at least not for me, only the end-result. And... Sony lineup is lacking, and sigm art zooms offer very good IQ at a more reasonable price. If you've used their 18-35 1.8 then you know what I mean

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 06:31 UTC

PLEASE offer it on SONY E also

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 05:58 UTC as 48th comment | 3 replies
Total: 194, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »