perry rhodan

Well, in the Netherlands we view it as the oppositie of boring. Go MAX!!

I like it a lot. In a thread someone showed some pics which put me off. Was sure my RX10M4 was miles better at longer FL. But after I tried one extensively, I love this 12 200. Why? Simply because of the fun it gives me. At 400 (eq) mm its IQ is more than enough for me. And the "macro" is great. What pleases me most is the ergonomics of actually zooming manually by hand.
(The EVF and the zoom by wire are the dealbreakers for me with the RX10M4. Its a great versatile piece but lacks the "fun" factor for me.

Really hope, now it is top dog, sony keeps pushing in the milc market. Unlike what they did after crushing the compact and bridge market with the RX100 and RX10 series.
The RX10m4 is most likely my last bridge camera. If it ever fails I buy a New one. If they go the dodo I snap up another Quick.

A bit of perspective.

Sorry guys. I almost allways loved your video's. But lately there seems to be something going wrong. With this one it is not funny anymore. You actually seem lost and on the wrong track. The "title" is utterly misleading. Is it to get more attention? Or what else? "HIGH-end APS-c mirrorless camera comparison". With this lot?

I get it, the camera market is on a deadroll. And some companies are in a struggle for life even. This is only natural as it is a long time ago you needed to sell your kidney to buy a great camera. A 25 euro per month cellphone is good enough and very easy to use for 99% of the world population that can afford this.

The segment that goes with this roll is naturally the surrounding test en review world. But please be sensible, stay honest to the trade. The world is already full of fluff and fake news. Keep it up guys, you can do better! Show us.

Lensprofiles are NOT related to the introduction of mirrorless. Get this and the entire article falls apart.

All nice items for sure. But it should read: "Vaporware of the Year 2021" :-)

The eos 3 was NOT the first. The 5 was years earlier. Dale also wrote this in 2017.

Please dpr do not rewrite history

It shows that DPR is not the target audience for most of the "competitors".

The moderators seem to be sleeping. Or am I missing something here?

"Comments on this article may be moderated before they are made public. Please keep your contributions c-o-n-s-t-r-u-c--t-i-v-e and civil."

Got one late. The kit with the very usefull 14 150 m2. For 499 euro on the Olympus site. A nice addition to what I have already.

Didnt like the UI the last 5 models I had, from the epl-1 up to the OMD EM5m2. Really wanted to like the Oly's for their ergonomics and nice jpeg. Now after setting the SCP I'm using this one as an easy on the go macro with a raynox DCR250 and two flashes. After all the RC mode is standard again.

No.. EVF, MIC INPUT, FLASH.. etcetera. The GOLD is a Joke. Sorry guys you completely burned your credibility here. All these points you (deliberately?) omitted in the comparing speclist. And to make things hilarious, you gave it the highest markt for .... features.. .. hah. And this is being civil about your "review".

Have both. On my RP the RF version is notably better, in every way. The most significant difference is the AF. It is miles better in speed, noise and accuracy.

Thanks MILC man and Richard. After reading both your responses and the article again I get it now. Sorry for the confusion!

Comparing the canon and Nikon parts about (canon) nano usm. If you read these 2 parts carefully the words used contradict in a remarkable way.

The DPR main headline only considers the 2 great points this body seems te have. The rest of them are so 2012. Well done and very balanced as usual DPR! Nice to leave the abysmal EVF, Ergonomics and menu out of it. Oh well, its a .....

The menu's are somewhat crippled in the newest bodies. And losing options to make menu's easier is not the way forward. And this still makes me cringe. There are Still many options greyed out in different ways in different parts of the menu system. I really Can not understand the reasoning.
But as I said before, I DO hope Olympus will see a way forward.

Have warm feelings for m43!

Had 5 oly bodies and 2 panny. Epl-1, epl2, omd10, 1, 2, omd 5,2 and panny gx80 and g9. And the oly interface drove me mad. It just didnt work for me. The panny was much better in this, but in The end the cost versus IQ and size wasnt right. FOR ME. As you can see I tried to like m43. Gave it several serious uses. In the end it didnt work out.
I really hope Olympus (and panny) wil prosper. The industry and we need the innovation they both bring. Fingers crossed!

What a weird world we live in. When you explicitly say "it is A", everyone starts making comments like "it is NOT B". Wonderfull!

And for the first time the video guys dropped the ball, completely!

@Kuro. Sorry to read you are dismissing me as a f@nboy. You could have taken the interest to look at my posting history before you wrote this.

@BARNEY

Thanks Barney! For your new reply. Clears things for me. Greatings Perry