cpharm86

Nice photo!

That’s what my daughters ask me  :-)

Thanks for sharing. <$4,000 I”ll buy it.  >$4,000 I”ll noodle on it awhile.  I haven’t been dissatisfied yet with my Canon purchases from my first digital, the  10D.

They had no idea about Covid-19. They will survive. They are not the only ones in this situation.

They just announced over $40,000 worth of cinema/video products and boasting the video capabilities of the R5. I would guess the R5 will be north of $4,000.

Very nice!

I just updated it but finally got it working about an hour ago. All my photos are on a 4TB external drive and also backed up on MacOS. For some reason beyond my knowledge when I updated LR to 9.2 ...

It didn't seem to work. All the photo folders are suspect. I'll look into this process a bit more. Thank you.

I'm not sure if this is the correct forum or I should ask on General Photo Techniques. I upgraded to LR 9.2 and now I have the question marks in my folders and exclamation marks on my thumbnails. ...

Now as a recent retired pharmacist of 35 years I agree this is a good idea. Most pharmacists are capable of making that decision. I wouldn’t see a problem with the physicians having pharmacists do ...

If there is an April 21st there would have been an April 20th :)

I guess I will be the first to comment.
Good for them. Stay safe.

I use Millers Imaging. They have great products. https://www.millerslab.com/home

I really like the photo! Excellent moment.

Regardless, my statement was that I really don't care what camera they use at the Olympic. BTW, your posting history has several snarky remarks therefore this conversation.
Oh....mirrorless 1st?...

@MikeRan I don't care what cameras they are using. Really no interest.
I'm just responding to Mariano Pacifico in a joking way. Chill......

@Mariano Pacifico I hope that is not the order of camera sightings at the Olympics you are speculating. This looks better. :)
1. Canon
2. Canon
3. Canon
4. Canon
5. Other