Dr_Jon

I don't get banding on my 5Dsr but I don't lift shadows more than three stops, I bracket if I want that as it gives a better image (however good the DR there's a lot of shot noise in the deep ...

I'd really like it on my RX100, as there's no way they're adding a mic in connector...

Buy a gimbal for your phone and an external microphone? Good sound and smooth movement tend to get noticed more than video issues unless it's really dark.

The RX10xxx cameras always seem to have slow write speeds so you're probably stuck and just thankful for having a big buffer so it doesn't interfere too much. Here are some tests for the V: https:/ ...

Most DXO stuff you login and go to the My Account page (should go straight there) and will see it as downloadable under the "software orders" tab.

BTW I set the network connection as a metered connection so it won't update automatically and then click Check for Updates to see what's available. There is a fixit to stop updates which I think ...

If you don't mind a bit of typing you can download FFMPEG and do (in a command prompt/shell): ffmpeg -i INFILE.mov -vcodec copy -acodec copy OUTFILE.mp4 Replacing INFILE and OUTFILE to suit. ...

... Exposure compensation is for when you want a different exposure than the camera is going to give you. Typically cameras assume a scene will average out to a mid grey. If you actually care about ...

Actually that's not a great example, scrolling down shows: But loading a GH5 video doesn't give this, just the audio/video codec info. (I'm mousing-over the lower "i" BTW.)

For Sony you can use catalyst Browser which will show EXIF-like settings for their videos. Not sure about others.

I've suggested previously people should do it (e.g. Sony) for cameras that are too small to have mic-in sockets (e.g. RX100mkX). There isn't a standard, but people can pick one. External recorders ...

They've said they will mostly or maybe entirely (re FF) launch RF lenses for the next couple of years, it would seem reasonable they'd want to add cameras to go with them.

Which I have no issues with! (But feel I can quote professional reviews alongside.)

I'm not convinced, as one would steal sales from the other and it would really only work if there was a lower and higher spec camera with significant differences. Otherwise you'll spend more on ...

I still have 2 or 3 of those, in their egg-shaped cases, plus used to work with Damian Peach, who's now moved on to bigger scopes/cameras...

It doesn't convert all the manufacturer EXIF data, although you may not care. Also you're committed to a Raw processor that eats DNGs (and does a good job) rather than any that support the ...

FYI my info came from: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-24-105mm-f-4L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx "With this lens mounted on an EOS R and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens mounted ...

I don't think they are going away either, but they are shrinking faster than the overall market is which is a problem. You make the most money at the lower end and everything they have there is a ...

It will get complicated if you want to use a lens + extender + adaptor... maybe someone should look at how the tolerances stack up... where's roger when you need him? Since I find extenders work ...

Small correction, DNG converter 11 is out: https://supportdownloads.adobe.com/detail.jsp?ftpID=6450