sapporodan

Even though i dislike the focal range, the lens produces beautiful images. The rendering and boheh are wonderful. no regrets buying it.

People who make pointless comments still around?

Hang on this is dpreview, of cause they are..........

For my Olympus I have one preset (for high contrast B&W) and link that to one of the function buttons, so whenever i feel the need to shoot B&W i just push the button and take the shot! also i ...

Aaaah! yes your right. i must apologies. i swapped my Panasonic 14-140 Mk1 for an Olympus 14-150 Mk2. I planned to dig out images from my 14-140 and take some exact shots with the 75-300. but ...

Use it on a EM5 Mk1. Great combination, i never missed the lack of manual focus on it. Even it it had it on, it would be so tiny it would probably be useless.

14-140 Mk2 75-300 Mk2 14-140 mk2 75-300 mk2 at 140 the 75-300 seems far sharper. All taken quickly hand held on my old EM5 Mk1

Ill try to fish some out. I do remember my 14-140 being softer in the corners and a tiny bit softer in the centre. But I do think my 14-140 is a tad softer than the average one!

That's the blinkys! Its not a fault, its just showing where the highlights and shadows are blown (Lost all details) I think try pressing the 'info' button. and it should stop showing it.

Just recently got the 60mm myself. And i was thinking about a ring flash, found some real cheap ring 'Lights' on Amazon that seem ok, but managed to snag an Olympus MAL-1 off eBay for cheap! Not ...

I am sure you'll get a bunch of idiots moaning about how you did the test for some reason or another! But for me it's informative, and i am grateful you took the time to do it. Cheers.

Its a good lens, Image quality is better than I expected. I like mine, and although its much better to use a tripod with a lens like this, I was wandering around just shooting hand hold yesterday ...

I just love the two GM cameras, I had the GM1 and loved its tiny size, but found the lack of antishake to be very annoying, that was the only thing putting me off buying a GM5. If Panasonic made a ...

I used this lens for years, its a great versatile lens, but I always felt the images coming out of it were a bit......flat, it seemed to lack the contrast I get from other lenses (even with hood). ...

Vlad i was referring to what David used to say at the start of his YouTube reviews, not for any specific camera. He probably only said it on a few of his vids but for some reason its always stuck ...

Historically Olympus was regarded to have better colours and look better at higher ISO's, but Panasonic's image quality nowadays looks great. In the 12 megapixel days I preferred Olympus, but now i ...

aaaah the 12-50, I have such a love/hate relationship with that lens! I do wish they would make an updated version, it was one of those lenses that could have been a classic!

You really wont notice a massive difference in image quality between them. More a differences in features. It's why i have not bothered to upgrade from my E-M5, the new cameras have way better ...

Off topic, but i wish you would go back to saying "This is my take of the........" at the start of your reviews. for some reason i am always disappointed when you don't say it! It's your signature :)

I am agreeing with you on this. I got into MFT for the small size, and it seems most of the decent lenses and body's released nowadays are far bigger. Would be nice to have another GM5 type camera, ...

I've owned quite a few Olympus and Panasonic body's, I always think Panasonic has the superior interface and usually better control layout, also two of my Olympus cameras have broken, but never ...