Rohith Thumati

Ah, thanks; hadn't noticed the EXIF data in that one. So it's definitely good for at least 1 stop. Canon is touting 4 stop stabilization, so it should be theoretically handholdable at full zoom at ...

I'm thinking more - how slow a shutter speed is usable? For example, with my E-M5 II with the 12-35 2.8 (which looks like it weighs about 2x the G1X III) I can get sharp handheld results at a 1/2 ...

How do you find the image stabilization? Thanks!

Good stuff; I really like the photo of the Burj Khalifa, and in the airport.

That's some great work!

Ouch!

I forgot one other minus: the flare. It does, and while it's not the ugliest flare, it's not the easiest to correct. I don't have the lens hood, but I remember from prior experience that it's ...

Several years ago, I had a copy of the Olympus 9-18mm f/4-5.6, but never really got on with it. I just didn't know how to make interesting shots at wider angles. So once I bought the Panasonic ...

To be clear - the 15mm isn't slow by any means. It's one of the faster focusing lenses for the system. If you never tried the 17mm, you wouldn't even notice.

Yeah, it's little annoying that Olympus doesn't enable the aperture ring, but it's still my favorite lens with my E-M5 mark II. I love the way it renders images, and it's really quite sharp. I had ...

It depends what you're doing in the parks, and what's the point of the trip - photography first, or family/travel/hiking first with photography on the side. i can only speak about Yosemite and SF ...

Ha, sorry. In that case, please ignore :)

Some great work! Composition is really strong, especially the last one. if I had a criticism, I think a lot of the photos are a little too static. Freezing motion is great, but when there's nothing ...

Yeah, I'm sure aesthetics have a lot to do with the IPC's (Internet Photo Community) different reactions to the cameras' form factors. "Classic" styling versus anonymous Canon brick. I'd bet, ...

The LX100 isn't all that much smaller than the G1X mark 2 already http://camerasize.com/compare/#534,569

Yep, that's pretty close to what I want. Provided it came in at a reasonable price (I.e., no more than the LX100's intro price), I'd certainly buy one to replace my thoroughly used LX100. I do ...

I feel fairly well qualified to answer the question, since I currently have the 15mm f1.7, 25mm f1.4, and 42.5mm f1.7, and I used to have the 20mm f1.7, 17mm f1.8, and 45mm f1.8. And I've got a 2 ...