Rohith Thumati

I just bought a black Megagear neoprene case for my LX100 II from Amazon (it’s available in a bunch of colors). It’s a little overpriced at $19.99 for what it is - just some neoprene sewn into the ...

So ... the Canon G1X III? i considered that one too, especially since the three cameras are in a $200 price spread now. Image quality seems comparable to/not any better than the LX100 II and RX100 ...

If your retailer has a good return policy, test out the LX100 II and see if you’re happy with it. If you are, enjoy, if not, return and get the VA. If it doesn’t, well, I wouldn’t preorder a camera ...

Are you sure the RX100 VA doesn’t have image stabilization? Everything I’ve seen about it says it has optical stabilization, like the LX100 I and II do.

Same problem here. Both cameras are really good, and neither is clearly better than the other - there doesn’t seem to be much difference in terms of image quality beyond personal preference in ...

The reasons to get the 45mm are to get a more classic portrait focal length with a shallower depth of field in a tiny body. The two lenses are close, but provide a different enough perspective to ...

Neat, good to know. Will definitely add Curaçao to the ‘need to visit list’ :-)

Thanks for sharing; I really liked the LX100 as a travel/everydaycamera when I had it. You have some gems in there (the turtle close up is a standout to me). It’s always fun and worthwhile to look ...

Thanks! By the way - I have this printed at 16x20 on my wall, and it looks great that size.

Hard to pick an overall favorite, but here’s a recent favorite, of the Point Bonita Lighthouse in the Marin Headlands in Sausalito before sunrise. i like how simple and moody it is, yet it still ...

Nice! The first is really good, but I love the last one - it tells a great story. I’m a big fan of the 35-100 f4-5.6; it’s a shockingly great little lens.

Great work! The tiger one, especially. Which zoo were these taken at? I probably have used my 40-150 f/2.8 at zoos more than everywhere else combined. Here are a few of my favorites (the first two ...

Amazing work, and the thorough write up is very much appreciated!

Funny, my E-M5 II kit is my big kit. If I think I’ll be able to steal some photo time on a trip, or if we’re going somewhere where telephoto reach will be needed (I.e., the San Diego Zoo), I’ll ...

Not sure that means much - they also gave the same rating to the G1X III, G7X II, RX100 V, and lots of other cameras ... Or maybe the real story is that all of these cameras are great, and we ...

I don’t think it’s that weird. If I like using a camera, I'm more likely to use it. The handling advantages of the G1X III (and the LX100 II) count a lot in my book. The Canon’s weather sealing is ...

Sorry if you’ve already coversed this - have you looked at the Canon G1X Mark III? It’s only US$100 more than the LX100 II now, so the price is comparable. It has slower lens, admittedly, but does ...

Looks pretty good; somewhat soft at 100%, but at normal viewing sizes on a 15” screen, looks just fine. Shows how important post processing software is to the final result. As far as good as ...

The 15mm is my most used lens. Here’re my thoughts comparing it against the 17mm 1.8 - https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60087298 Also, the 35-100 f4-5.6 is a great tele zoom. The only issues: (1) t ...

Lots of good options in here, and I’ve tried most of them myself. One thing the OP didn’t say was exactly what gear, other than the camera, he’d be carrying, and what other camera gear (other ...