ChuckTa

In what way is those image bad? When you said the Huawei is blurry, I believe you are looking at a 40mp image at over 200% zoom.  The same blur will be seem for Panasonic, Sony A7, Fuji XT20, ...

Did u even download the images to view on your PC? Here is a shot from Panasonic GX9 PanLeica 12-60 and Huawei Raw. One is 20mp and another 40mp viewed at 100%, can you tell which one is more ...

ON1 Photo Raw 2020 https://www.on1.com/products/photo-raw/

The right is what I see from DPR web, the left is my PC image viewer at 100%. I don't know why DPR display blow up the image 200% or so. I suggest yo download the image to your PC and view it ...

Finally had came around to test out the P20 raw output using ON1. I use auto adjust function on ON1 and a few quick tweaking aftwards. I was surprise on how much detail exist in those 40mb images.

I like to point out not all the lens on smartphone is slow, as they come in range from around f1.6~2.4. And all of them use prime lens, not zoom. Those lens modules are produced in the millions and...

I found this review interesting as he is a landscape photographer and he even did a large print at the end. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfLYP8AM6YU&feature=youtu.be

I thought Samsung s20 ultra huge sensor can not be beat anytime soon, and Huawei P40 Pro+ step up to the game. I see 1 inch sensor coming to a smartphone near you.

Because the sales of smartphones are in the tens of million whereas camera company sales are in the tens of thousand, or less.

Exactly.  I don't think I have ever seem a photography site that upsample an image for comparison (other than for a really specific reason) , except for the one in this thread.

Tks for posting the images. There is a lot of noise artifacts in the clouds from the jpeg image. The dynamic (HDR maybe) isn't that good as the trees are completely in the dark without detaill. The ...

I agree with you. I found it very odd why some of the crop are so pixelated and it makes the comparison not so meaningful. Also no mention that the Samsung ultrawide has no autofocus, so maybe ...

Wouldn't this be an issue of choosing carriers rather than an issue of the cameras on the phone? The Xiaomi cost is just a little over a third of the Samsung 20 Ultra. Which basically is what this ...

That's funny, there are over 10 LTE bands in USA and missing one new one will the phone useless? So not having 5G means most of the phone currently sold useless?

Xiaomi Note 10 pro also has 108mp 1.33" sensor, ultrawide, 2 x tele (50mm), and 5x tele and cost $449 usd. If camera is your only criteria, you are over paying Iphone and Samsung.

Actually, no. The Sony RX100 mk6 can't do that image ... because that image is taken by a 16mm ultrawide camera in the Huawei P30 Pro. The Sony RX100 MK6 wide starts at 24mm.

I would not recommend  Pixel for the simple reason that P20 has a 3x tele and a wide while Xiaomi has 3 cameras: 2x tele, wide, and ultrawide. Pixel 3 has only one camera and its main sensor size ...

Truly superb set of images. Your images shows its pretty clear its better to focus on photographic skills than equipment. Imoved to M43 last year owning both apsc and ff, and I have used more M43.

Just wondering why the Huawei image is down sized as normal 10mp is 3648 x 2736 where as Nokia is showing full size ? Also, All Nokia image has -0.33ev, any reason for that? Anyways, the Huawei ...

And Huawei Mate 30 Pro main camera f/1.6 1/1.7" , ultrawide f/1.8 1/54" sensor. There are also Samsung/Sony 108mp 1/1.33" sensor which is already used in Xiaomi Note 10.