Joined on Oct 26, 2012


Total: 337, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (189 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheWhiteDog: I love how people think these "Art" lenses are a blow to Canon and Nikon, I think the opposite, Canon and Nikon love this. Think about it, these are highly desirable lenses that get great press and many want them. Very often photographer's choice of a camera is based on lenses available for it. So you want the Sigma "Art" lenses, well the bodies they are made for are Canon's and Nikon' s( most people really don't want to use adapters)! I know 3 people who bought D7200s and a D500 just so they could use the 18-35mm f1.8. So Sigma is doing Nikon and Canon a huge favor and helping them maintain their market positions. Ricoh should subsidize Sigma to produce these lenses in K mount. For the K1 that would increase its sales dramatically. So, in other words, dont feel sorry for Canon and Nikon, this is a much needed boost for sales of their camera bodies and along the way, said buyers will end up buying some Canon/Nikon lenses too.

I have one FX body and one DX, but I have much more lenses than the camera bodies. I have paid significantly more amount to the lenses than the bodies. That said, I believe Cankon would prefer taking sustainable commitment from us by selling both lenses and bodies, if Tam and Sigma continue to eat up the segment of the lense market, then Cankon is half eff + ed.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 03:10 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (189 comments in total)

Funny the Sigma Art lenses look even better than L lenses when they are attached to the beautiful Canon bodies.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 00:49 UTC as 17th comment
On article Leica SL Review (764 comments in total)

"It is the photographer, not the camera", this gallery has proved this saying with this technically inferior machine.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 00:47 UTC as 73rd comment

No wonder people believe Nikon is dying.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 03:35 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon PC Nikkor 19mm F4E sample gallery (87 comments in total)
In reply to:

pepeta: Please do more of this and bring Nikon back to profit!! We should not let it go down under without a helping hand..Mr Spencer, you are probably the best photographer Dpreview has at the moment.

Nikon needs to help their customers to help themselves.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 12:45 UTC

Tamron recently lenses look even more modern than Nikkor. How come?

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 12:31 UTC as 22nd comment

Have we arrived to the era where 3rd party lenses are priced as 1st party's and 1st party's become unaffordable?

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 00:50 UTC as 44th comment | 4 replies
On article Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art DxO results: a new king is crowned (249 comments in total)

So what Nikon is going do next? Further increase the prices that proven not working recently.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2017 at 00:57 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply
On article Have Your Say: Best Gear of 2016 (100 comments in total)

NIkon has been doing so badly in recent years, give them an award to save them please.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2016 at 04:16 UTC as 20th comment | 1 reply
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1604 comments in total)

Pro: JPEGs offer typically good 'Canon color'

Canon JPEG Colors can't be called 'Good', it should be called 'Amazing'.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2016 at 01:01 UTC as 128th comment | 4 replies

Are the stolen phone numbers for users to give Yahoo for a better security email account or the stolen phone numbers are users gave Yahoo voluntarily for keeping their personal info there? Do you guys know?

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2016 at 04:33 UTC as 8th comment
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (333 comments in total)

91% seriously?

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2016 at 00:54 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
On article New kid on the block: YI M1 review (708 comments in total)

Can't believe that it scored 69% like the V1.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2016 at 00:56 UTC as 63rd comment | 1 reply
On article Sigma 12-24mm F4 DG HSM Art Lens Review (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

QuarryCat: So bad - Sigma failed again.
We all want the best Performance for half the price.
But all Nikon-Users will have to pay for the 14-24 mm monster or stay with the 16-35 mm VR -
all Canon-Users will dream from the heavy-fat 11-24 mm L or live with the very good 4/16-35 mm L IS
all others still wait for a real good ultra-wideangle or use single focal lenses.
The Tamron 15-30 mm doesn't deliver, not for Pentax, nor for Canon or Nikon.
And the new Sigma stays disappointing for to much money.
Next chance is Nikon, to built a real good, not so large 4.0/14-24 mm.

For sure, but Sigma hadn't been failed once since the first introduction of the Art line. It is the first time, plus it will be sold half the price of the Cankon with more than 9/10 as good. You wont go wrong getting this lens and no one can tell the difference without side by side pixel peeping.

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2016 at 11:11 UTC
On article 2016 Roundup: Compact Enthusiast Zoom Cameras (372 comments in total)

5 generations of RX100 won nothing.

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2016 at 00:53 UTC as 27th comment | 2 replies
On article Sigma 12-24mm F4 DG HSM Art Lens Review (245 comments in total)

Minor differences in image quality but huge differences in prices. The Sigma is the all round winner.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 05:48 UTC as 54th comment | 12 replies
On article LensRentals tests the Nikon 70-200mm F2.8 FL ED (110 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: I'm suprised Nikon would charge so much especially with Sigma, Tamron, Tokina have been stepping up lately and making high quality lenses ... I always thought that advancements in tech make things less expensive, apparently camera companies haven't been given the memo..

May be putting the price much higher than Sigma and Tamron's can differentiate that Nikon lenses are more superior when the majority people who don't look at in-depth comparison reviews. Smart act of Nikon since they don't innovate.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 01:17 UTC
On article Sigma 12-24mm F4 DG HSM Art Lens Review (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

brycesteiner: How come Nikon, Canon get all the lens coverage but Olympus, Panasonic and Sony are pretty much excluded from the DXO comparison chart? There are a couple but nothing that you can truly compare with these other brands to find out which system has the best lenses.

Thanks Dpreview, it means you are going to review them? Thank you in advance.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 01:06 UTC

Why do Sony cameras need to use optical inferior lenses from Nikon?

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 01:10 UTC as 24th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

thubten: Why does an adapter cost as much as a lens?

Because they don't have enough competitors.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 01:07 UTC
Total: 337, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »