Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 31, 2007


Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8

I have had some and liked them, but moving to the Godox system because of the availability of ttl and the integrated receiver/flash system they have. And not much more money ....

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2016 at 22:56 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On photo IMG_1536 in the Tilt Shift challenge (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

Xezi: I'm still unsure if this is a mockup or a real city. Looks like it's a large collection of wood miniatures. Very good.

I don't think you can tell by looking at the buildings, but the bushes and trees look asymmetrical and organic, not preformed plastic. That makes me think it's a real place.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 23:51 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1124 comments in total)
In reply to:

Akpinxit: Really impressive .With such high players , it is getting harder and harder to pick new model to buy .

Actually, this makes it easier to pick a new one to buy.

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 00:30 UTC
On article Tamrac Evolution 9 Photo Backpack Review (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

RudivanS: Just got the new Vanguard Up-rise 48 series II - very well made and above all handy.

I'm deciding between these two bags now. Two advantages the Tamrac has over the Vanguard: 1. two side access panels; 2. ability to change to sling and backpack. Your thoughts? What about the Vanguard would lead you to choose that over this one? Anything it has this doesn't?

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2014 at 16:47 UTC
On article Massive 3,000 square foot pinhole photo on display (34 comments in total)

Wait, I think I see Jesus' face.

Link | Posted on May 2, 2014 at 18:07 UTC as 16th comment
On article Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? (1507 comments in total)

I can't believe the number of whiny old (and young -- don't want to be ageist here) farts complaining about why this camera isn't there and why that camera isn't there and why that is there and blah blah blah. Oh DPR is a whore and all this nonsense.

Please, stop the nearest person and ask them to slap you hard in the face to bring you back into reality. This poll is nothing to get upset about. Nothing to complain about. Just get over yourselves, would you please?!

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 16:06 UTC as 371st comment

The older version was really stunning, optically. I was so impressed. It's AF was as bad as it's optics were good. I wanted to buy it, but couldn't bring myself to. If this AF is decent, and if the optical quality is at least as good as the older version, this should sell like hotcakes. (Unless it's priced too closely to the OEM versions.)

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 19:30 UTC as 51st comment
On article Sigma USA announces pricing of 50-150mm F2.8 OS HSM (105 comments in total)

My copy of the non-OS version of this lens was very, very sharp. I've the Canon 70-200 II now, so have another wickedly sharp zoom, but this one focused accurately and was a remarkable lens for me. If I were in the market, I'd certainly consider this lens. It is on the high side.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2012 at 01:38 UTC as 37th comment
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8