East Las Vegas Film School

East Las Vegas Film School

Lives in United States Las Vegas, NV, United States
Works as a Fake Film and Video Organization
Has a website at twitter.com/ELVFilmSchool
Joined on Jun 21, 2014
About me:

A reliable fake film school.

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
In reply to:

onlooker: 200+ comments, of which 150 argue over pro/semi-pro labels, and 50 over anti-Pentax bias. There, I summarized it for you.

@FuhTeng Happy to do my part. #pentax #pentax #pentax

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2016 at 20:30 UTC
In reply to:

starwolfy: They should come to Korea. People here leave their phone on the coffee shop tables while they go to the rest room. Amazing ;)

Laugh it up, but Las Vegas is, against all odds, a shockingly safe place viz. leaving electronica unattended. I leave laptops, tablets, cameras, and my wife (uses assistive devices, so she does count) unattended all the time, and I almost never get slimed. (DISCLAIMER: Though I wouldn't get too careless in the tourist areas if I were me.)

Link | Posted on Aug 6, 2016 at 21:08 UTC
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (285 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bernard Carns: I'm anxiously awaiting for skeet shooting test article.
And after that the dropped in a lake test article.....
Although the lake test might have some merit.
We need to come up for a name for these articles.
Like they did naming "the athlete arrest of the day" articles.
:-)
BC

I think that that is called, "Digital Rev TV." :)

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 21:03 UTC
In reply to:

onlooker: 200+ comments, of which 150 argue over pro/semi-pro labels, and 50 over anti-Pentax bias. There, I summarized it for you.

For the record, I "Liked" the second remark by "onlooker," just out of a healthy respect for truth.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 12:29 UTC
In reply to:

onlooker: 200+ comments, of which 150 argue over pro/semi-pro labels, and 50 over anti-Pentax bias. There, I summarized it for you.

ROTFLMAO! Of course, Pentax erred in making their astonishing first digital full-frame product an affordable one! (Hey, DPR, I own four $500 cameras. Good enough? Or am I just one of those rotten "enthusiasts"?)

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 16:41 UTC

I've seen at least two of these Nikons for under $2K. Just saying.

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 16:37 UTC as 167th comment
In reply to:

Fujica: Too bad Samsung couldn't hold up the race.
Perhaps they had the best mirrorless camera with their NX1. It wasn't however enough for them to make enough money with them.

I've been gifting away my superfluous NX gear to my PA, but by bit. I have my bodies and lenses whittled down now to a small but attractive core of three good lenses and two bodies, and I'll probably leave it at that. (BTW, my other gear includes Micro 4/3, Canon EF, a few Canon FD lenses with funky adapters, and the much-maligned but still capable Nikon Coolpix A.)

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 16:34 UTC
In reply to:

fotomotovfr: I wonder how many get the MST3000 reference?

Well played sirs, well played. :)

Noteworthy here that Samsung NX system is now itself a "Cinematic Titanic."

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 16:30 UTC
On article CP+ 2015: Canon shows off prototype 120MP CMOS sensor (250 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mescalamba: That size has a name, APS-H. :) It would be something around 1.26x crop or so..

I was wondering about the size issue as well. Moreover, it's not like the space between Canon's APS-C sensors and full-frame sensors is otherwise uncharted. For example, everyone else's APS-C sensors fit into the interval in question.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 17:30 UTC
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9