Dazed and Confused

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Joined on May 23, 2002

Comments

Total: 94, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Nikon's official D850 lens recommendation list (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dazed and Confused: I just realised I assumed that this is an exclusive list, rather than just a list of *some* of the lenses they recommend.

Given there's no source posted, I'm not going to read anything into this list.

Airships in general, really.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 22:37 UTC
On article Nikon's official D850 lens recommendation list (296 comments in total)

I just realised I assumed that this is an exclusive list, rather than just a list of *some* of the lenses they recommend.

Given there's no source posted, I'm not going to read anything into this list.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 20:59 UTC as 108th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon's official D850 lens recommendation list (296 comments in total)

No primes at all between 28mm and 105mm? Really? I can only assume Nikon have some new lenses in that range on the way.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 20:04 UTC as 127th comment
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: Just one more reason why you should NEVER trust anything to "The Cloud".

@GodSpeaks

What has Google deprecating their old software, and replacing it with a new version (as well as there also being loads of third party alternatives) have to do with trusting the cloud?

That's like saying there's one more reason to never trust anything to physical media when a company releases new backup software, or an OS updates it's file system.

Or did you not read the article?

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2017 at 09:58 UTC
In reply to:

Dante Birchen: I would strongly advise not to use the new backup and sync app. It is uploading all of my photo's to drive taking up space even though I use high quality instead of original. When i don't select the pictures folder it just doesn't back up anything. This software obviously is not ready yet.

Are you sure you have it set up correctly? I have it uploading photos from one folder and backing up separately from others, and it's working flawlessly. I might just be lucky (or you're unlucky and have hit a bug), but there are quite a few setup options, so there is potential for human error.

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2017 at 09:56 UTC

Such a shame. 66 is far too young nowadays, and she was still producing great work.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2017 at 09:10 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

WT21: Who is she and why should i care??

>Do you define the worth of someone by whether there is a Times article

Not at all - and I certainly never implied that in my comment. I clearly pointed it out because it provides a lot of detail to help answer your question of who she is.

I apologise that I didn't realise that your obnoxious, patronising question was meant sarcastically.

>do you ever think for yourself?

I will assume you had the same intention with that question.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 10:32 UTC

The photos in the New York Times article are brilliant. I have to admit to not really knowing much about the art of self portrait photography, but I'll certainly be looking into it more.

This, combined with the video on microSD cards, makes it a good day for DPReview. A nice combiantion of the art of photography, and some genuinely useful technical information. Some of the linked articles had got a bit 'Buzzfeedy' lately (e.g. the AirBnB eclipse promo). Shame this article didn't make the main feed, though.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 09:55 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

WT21: Who is she and why should i care??

>Who is she

It literally says in the article:

"Sherman—who is well-known for her critical self-portrait work following the release of her Untitled Film Stills project [...] MacArthur Genius Grant recipient"

and it links to an in depth piece about her in the New York Times.

But as you couldn't even read those 4 paragraphs, I imagine you'll struggle with this comment too.

I do not understand why people think it's so cool to not know stuff, or to not bother to find out.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 09:50 UTC
In reply to:

Tons o Glass 0 Class: I know I shouldn't be complaining about a USB port and the ability to upgrade firmware on a budget clone lens but why is it on the front?

And they claim 12-point sunstars from a 6-bladed aperture... ('_')

I'm sure Canon had a zoom lens with 12 pointed stars from 6 blades. I think they put a sharp bend in the blade, so creating 12 'corners'. Didn't work at every aperture, though.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2017 at 15:54 UTC
In reply to:

xlabsmedan: Its a panasonic with red label :D

Really? What is the Panasonic equivalent?

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2017 at 15:36 UTC
In reply to:

Weerterbos: Ah, an interesting piece about strobing a sports arena!
Oh no, just name dropping and a 2 photo guess-about.

I also think it would be courteous to at least mention the Reddit discussion they likely got this from, too: https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/6esozl/how_do_nba_photographers_get_images_like_this/

It's totally fine to get inspiration from other sites, but I do think it should made clear, otherwise it starts looking like you're doing a Buzzfeed.

Apologies if this is just a total coincidence.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 07:21 UTC
In reply to:

RedFox88: Hmm... this camera or a house...hmmm....

Where are you buying houses for $50,000?!

Link | Posted on May 10, 2017 at 12:03 UTC
In reply to:

String: It's only for a hipster, it's too expensive, blah blah blah... why not look at it as more of a fun little project you can build with young kids and get them started with photography. Is that really such a bad thing?

>Who cares how easy it is?

I imagine lots of people do. Surely the point of an educational exercise is to pitch it at the correct level? An appropriate level of complexity is where the time and enjoyment comes in.

I don't see how not blindly agreeing that every photo product is perfectly suited for every use just because it is a photo product is bitter - I'm just pointing out the likely much better options for achieving your goal.

I suppose if I pointed out that a Sony A9 might not be the best first camera for a toddler, and gave you a helpful link to more suitable cameras, that would also be me being 'bitter about photo products'?

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 12:26 UTC
In reply to:

String: It's only for a hipster, it's too expensive, blah blah blah... why not look at it as more of a fun little project you can build with young kids and get them started with photography. Is that really such a bad thing?

Building it is literally just putting the pre-assembled board in the case and tightening 4 screws. It's about as educational as Nokia's interchangeable covers from 20 years ago.

If the build itself is the main purpose, there are already plenty of far better options: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-diy-cameras-can-build-today/

Link | Posted on May 1, 2017 at 21:52 UTC

>Interestingly, none have upgraded to the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II or 5D Mark IV.

That's the thing I find most interesting about this article. If they felt no need to upgrade their cameras anyway, even with the comparative ease of staying within systems, I wonder if the Sony offers them enough to switch entire systems.

In my experience, I find that pros are often less concerned with having the very latest or 'best' gear than many amateurs. If it's good enough, it's good enough - why pay more?

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2017 at 12:04 UTC as 218th comment | 1 reply

This all comes down to the fact that it isn’t really medium format – it’s a crop to keep cost and size down. While it’s still obviously got benefits over full-frame, they’re not as pronounced as the traditional medium format sizes would give.

It’ll be interesting to see whether this size survives if and when larger medium format becomes more readily available. It could be a sweet spot, like 1.6x, or disappear like most of the 1.3x crops did when full frame became more affordable.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2017 at 10:59 UTC as 447th comment | 3 replies
On article Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art DxO results: a new king is crowned (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

dtray187: I had this lens on my d810 for a few shoots.... it was incredibly sharp , but the bokeh was not looking good to me, too harsh, that's a huge deal. And the way it rendered skin wasn't to my liking. It Was just too clinical, I replaced with the 105mm 1.4e and wow that thing is amazing!
Honestly the 85mm 1.4g I liked better than the art, 1.4g wasn't as sharp but rendered incredible, memorable portraits. This sharpness war needs to be balanced with results on portraits.

@Biological_Viewfinder

I think you're massively oversimplifying. If the sharpness is more than adequate, then other factors play a bigger role.

Taking it to an extreme, I think most people would prefer a lens that gave 99% of maximum sharpness and 100% perfect bokeh over one with 100% sharpness and 0% bokeh.

People choosing a lens for bokeh doesn't mean that they place no importance on sharpness at all. It just might be that a small disadvantage in sharpness is more than acceptable, and outweighed by benefits elsewhere.

The idea that people are choosing lenses based on bokeh are unconcerned by sharpness sounds like a bit of straw man to me.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 21:25 UTC

I loved this camera's design - I think it was genuinely great. It definitely had advantages over a flip out screen, as you can have the controls at a more comfortable and secure angle too. It was so versatile, and great for macros low to the ground. I would love to see a modern version.

It's a real shame that camera design has become so much more conservative recently. All these retro looking cameras are copies of cameras that were shaped by the limitations of film and mirror boxes and rangefinder mechanisms, not because they were the very best shape they could be.

Designers have been freed from those restrictions, yet the public now associate that classic shape with a 'proper' camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 11:55 UTC as 98th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

noflashplease: The W100 is just a rewarmed S33, and quite frankly, I can't understand why Nikon needs an annual update of a camera oriented towards small children? Maybe there's a big annual update market among elementary school children in Japan?

The other camera looks like something from the middle of the last decade. A CCD sensor? Really?

Both produces look irrelevant in 2017. It's time for Nikon to retire the "Coolpix" brand. The point and shoot market is now extinct.

Interestingly, among my friends this Christmas the W100 was the most popular camera. It's a great little camera for children, especially on holiday.

Nikon wouldn't still be turning out a new one each year if they weren't selling enough to justify it.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 18:33 UTC
Total: 94, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »