Lives in Canada Milton/ON, Canada
Works as a Business Consultant / Photographer
Has a website at
Joined on Jul 13, 2004
About me:

To sell non-contracted photos.


Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Looking forward to picking up a 7 Plus. Mainly for extra capacity and using to fly my drone. Improvements in camera is always a bonus, but not a reason for me to get it. Only use it for photos in a pinch, or to log receipts.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2016 at 12:32 UTC as 80th comment

I like his chicken, finger lickin good.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2016 at 05:40 UTC as 5th comment
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (874 comments in total)

I don't get why people still buy these new? Whenever I'm asked for advice on what to buy, I always start with Kijiji. So many of these are for sale used because people buy them not realizing how little they'll actually use them, it's awesome.

By the time you add taxes to this price, or any shipping costs of you don't buy direct in a store, you have way more options with that budget. Buying something like this new is a waste of money, really isn't much more this camera has to offer for entry level DSLR or ILC shooters.

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2016 at 16:28 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with the Nikon D5 (409 comments in total)
In reply to:

dprived prev: to those amateur photographers (here or anywhere) who start bragging about the !!! superiority !!! of a mirrorless camera over an SLR first, but then quit doing so once they receive their proper answers from the pros or other knowledgeable and more experienced advanced amateurs; no offense, but:

Mirror, mirror on the wall,
Who's the dumbest of all?
Must be the girlie photog,
Who can't handle a large cam?!
Or maybe it is that obese m`am!?


Humorous banter. At the end of the day it boils to what you can make work for the images you want. I have APS, FF, mirrorless (micro 4/3) and a little Sony sensor in my DJI drone. All I care about is making money with my images, as the client doesn't care about the tools only what the images. Discussion about what gear is better has to tie back to what image you want to present. This banter is funny because it's pointless.

The sexiest part of the conversation is amusingly brave πŸ˜‰

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 22:23 UTC

For me, the best this could be is a bigger presenter of images, that's it. And as far as the pencil is concerned, in most photos or videos of its usage, I see the persons hand awards being held off the iPad surface. I don't write or draw like that, pretty uncomfortable for me to be worth the effort for any duration of time. And as others have said, USB connectivity. How do I take my images off my CF card, store them on a portable hard drive and then work on the RAW files like in Lightroom. And lastly, I use Lightroom so much that I will not abandon my PC and switch to another software.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2015 at 23:12 UTC as 35th comment

I'll have to check the Younguo version people keep mentioning, but having this with my 600 and 580 canon flashes would help with quick photo shoots vs adjusting manually with a light meter. The end of the day, I just want to get the shot I intend in as little time as possible.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2015 at 19:12 UTC as 8th comment

Instead focusing on something that can't be valued, they should focus on their overheating issue. This is why they are nowhere in the % of new handsets sold.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2015 at 10:53 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On article DJI Phantom 3 Standard photography drone unveiled (73 comments in total)

I have the Advanced version, and like the output so far (been getting used to it for a week now). It is noisy, but I like that is (even my nano quads sound like loud mosquitos). I wouldn't want it to be quiet and have it sneak up on me, and the neighbours probably like the fact they can hear it and not worry about silent intrusions. Fall is coming, and I can't wait to get photos only a drone or hot air balloon can take.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2015 at 17:05 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Walmart sues photographer's widow over family pictures (164 comments in total)
In reply to:

Handymuss: The many posts here about this are very telling. Because the Waltons have tons of money, lots of assumptions are made. Greed is showing everwhere. Most complain about Walmart. (has nothing to do with Walmart) This is a simple case of a client offering money for the rights to the photos that a photog took, and that money being offered apparently is not enough that the photog (widow in this case) will accept. So they go to court over it to try and settle the disagreement.(you can claim anything you want in court, the law may say something completely different however...)

The last time you had a client that wanted all rights to the photos you took, how much did you charge them? Did you charge them on ability to pay, or a standard amount? If so, you are just as greedy as most posters complain the Waltons are. It cuts both ways.

The court may rule with the Walton for rights to photos based on price comparable to other clients charged for same material, plus any appreciation due to inflation, and incurred costs of storage. It would be different if a collector came to buy at a price much higher than the family offered. What will be interesting is the counter suit buy the widow, now that could be a pretty penny.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2014 at 16:51 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (706 comments in total)

The LCD flips up so you can take a medium format selfie.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 02:57 UTC as 221st comment | 5 replies

How about:

"Doc Op"

It's the doctor that makes the optics better. And yes, I'm a Spider-Man fan, and this thing looks like it has 8 arms.

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2014 at 10:10 UTC as 9th comment
On article What Apple announcements mean for mobile photographers (67 comments in total)

I like the idea of the android platform better, however the reality is most of us don't have time to spend learning how to tweak. From a marketing perspective Apple has it right, the proof is in the numbers. At work we are all given blackberry phones, but there is a large enough group that have iPhones that they are considering iPhone usage. 4 out 5 people I work with have an iPhone, and my whole team we all have iPhone 5's except for one Samsung Note 2. I have friends with the new Samsung S4, and they both carry extra batteries with them. The girl who has it is looking to switch to an iPhone after yesterday's iOS review.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2013 at 10:39 UTC as 9th comment | 4 replies
On article What Apple announcements mean for mobile photographers (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wye Photography: I really enjoy using the iPhone camera, the results are impressive and it makes a pleasant change from using my Hasselblad and Pro digital cameras. The quick preview of the whole OS looks really impressive. And that mac Pro, I mean, what a stunning design.

I just wish the camera update went further. RAW output, manual WB, exposure compensation just to name a few. Perhaps they can do a "pro" version for those wanting to do more instead of a camera app for the millions of instagrammers.

I agree. I consider the comparison to my old Olympus 8080 (which was an awesome camera when it came out), and the iPhone 5 images are that much better (zoom not considered).

Besides, some of the best images are due to you just having a camera on you, and the iPhone 5 is exceptionally portable compared to other cameras and smartphones.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2013 at 10:31 UTC

For me, the choice of getting one of these cameras is to have something better than my iPhone, and more portable than my DSLRs. Optical lens at this level is pretty much useless, so the trade off for me is to have a flippity screen. Canon is out, and Nikon would be in. Having said that, I'm very happy continuing to use my G12.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2013 at 11:39 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

Lee Jay: $70? I built one of these years ago from stuff lying around my house!

I agree with TWIZEEL. I'd rather spend my time earning rather than saving. Plus when I'm at a client's home / office, I want to be able to set up/tear down quickly, and this sorts that out. Then of course there are those clients that don't want you walking on with home made looking stuff, perception sometimes drive marketability.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2013 at 05:29 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): I have been checking daily for price and availability on this lens. I love VR in the mid-range because I can shoot lower ISOs handheld and still get nice sharp photos. A D800e is in my distant future, and right now all I have are primes for mid-range on my D700, no VR (not a big problem for the D700). I want this lens, if it checks out good. I believe the street price will drop after release, sooner rather than later. If it just has good center sharpness at f2.8 I'm all in for it. Imagine the indoor, casual family portraits you could get with this and a D800e.

Moore and soft corners is overblown. If you are doing commercial work, then it may be an issue ... but then you probably wouldn't look at this or comment in the first place. Get your gray point, shoot your portraits, run your raw files through and get paid for your work. When you're shooting wide open, who cars about soft corners.

Non-commercial customers don't complain about corners and more, photographers do.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2012 at 21:47 UTC
Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »