harveysteeves

it works fine - maybe not fabulous but fine.  I find my corners a little soft wide open but on a DX camera that would be noticed.

just about the ultimate in convenience for travelling.  I purchased one when I purchased my EM5.2 - to travel with.  It has been overseas several times now and has gone from the EM5.2 to a PenF. ...

although I would prefer an 80-200.  To go with the 23 and 32-64 to give a nice set of lenses to do things with.  The TS is a niche lens and you can do that with adapters now.  85 is a shallow DOF ...

So, only one company should make a product? Who is your choice for the single dslr maker?

people are occasionally succeeding at doing hand-held hi-res with the Olympus EM1.2 and it's been out for awhile. And it's 8 frames combined.

but how many owners of current h-res cameras actually print big on a consistent basis?

it might be similar on the EM5.2.

tripod? Is that what you call it? ;-)

and not just spent a few minutes with it, you will not appreciate just how good the ergonomics of it are.  It is a night and day difference over the D810 in handling and better than the D500 which ...

they give a real sense of place.

Canon AF WAS better for BIF.  Maybe that's why Morris like Canon AF.

the lens is a thing of beauty - have you had it on an m4/3s body?

then why didn't he switch when he was fired 4 years ago?  Although if you read his blog, his firing was part of a larger personal dump at the time - not just of photographers but also management ...

says the best there is for birds in flight. Did not know that Canon had fired him 4 years ago. http://www.birdsasart-blog.com

just like they lost so many customers with that lame follow-up to the D810 ... oh, wait,

why would Nikon want to allow use of Sony lenses when they sell their own?

how does carrying that laptop with you on your 3 day backcountry hike work for you? Or perhaps you can drag that laptop out while shooting a 10 hour wedding - the bride's mother will love you. ...

I own one. I also own the Panny 15 and the Oly 17/1.8. And I am impressed. I will be getting my hands on the 17/1.2 soon. It should be an interesting comparison.

as those who have been buying the Canon version for the past couple of years - at about that same proposed price point.  The 200-400 had some issues, this new lens will hopefully take care of ...

and in DSLRs, including the FF K-1 and so how makes it work.  It also uses an offshoot of the old K-mount rather than a new mount like Canon.