CAT Productions

I would keep the Nikkor.

Definitely agree, VR & AF on the E are great! I actually still have the VR II and the new E. IMO, the new E is better across the board at 2.8 (including 70 & 200; especially into the corners); ...

+ 1 & the 70-200 2.8 E is noticeably better than the VR II!

Only differences: real base ISO 32; 70 mp; same or better DR as D810. Perhaps we'll get something like it with a D5X or D900?

Not so sure the 70-200 2.8 FL won't make the cut even with the TX 2X. Thom has gushed about how superb the new 70-200 2.8 FL is (and I agree).

The new 70-200 for sure!!

What specifically about the chart leads you to come to that conclusion?

Not sure where you're getting your info about the D810 being "much better" than the D800E at higher ISO??

You keep shooting with 2nd best.

What onslaught? The 6D Mark 2?

You nuts?

Nice!

I always found the D300 had better IQ and much cleaner shadows at ISO 100 (LO 1 setting).

I'd like a D5x! 🏆

Nice. Thx, Marianne.

Compared to the Sigma 85 Art, the Sigma 135/1.8 Art does have better control of LoCA, right? The 135/1.8 Art seems to be sharper than the 105/1.4 IMO. I know sharpness isn't everything but I don't ...

Just got the 135/1.8 Sigma Art. Omg! Now that's a crazy sharp lens. It's great. Re Sigma Art glass, I'm now a believer. I've gotta say I prefer the 135/1.8 to the 105/1.4 Nikon (which I didn't ...

Well-done, Liisa. That 50 1.4D should do just fine.

Why do you like garbage built-in flash lighting?

I think your input is pure nonsense.