io_bg

I agree. Buying used can net you some good deals. I got the 27 in a perfect condition for $225, a little dusty but otherwise great 16-50 for about $90 and a good looking 60 macro for $280. Not too ...

The XC 50-230 costs $400 brand new. So did it's sibling, the 16-50.

1) Attach a lens if you haven't already. 2) Take off the lens cap. 3) Switch off Preview exposure in manual mode. Or keep it on and select settings that will result in a well-exposed photo.

I think a Leica would suit you better. It's an expensive brand with expensive lenses.

Sure. Sometimes I've had to stop down to f/16 even with a ND filter attached.

I love the look you've achieved but except the dirt sensor and/or lens the photo is quite soft. Not only because of the diffraction caused by the aperture choice but because the photo seems out of ...

This just shows how polished the camera was from the beginning. Or do you have any suggestions what else could be added via a firmware update?

You might not but more people shoot APS-C cameras than FF ones.

This is what dpreview's camera comparison tool says. But they could've gotten it wrong. I doubt X-T20's JPGs would have any more dynamic range in any of the DR modes. Maybe it's time you started ...

There's a X-A5 for that, minus the EVF though.

I don't think Fuji will make such a camera. The X camera lineup is already quite crowded. (1) X-H1 - $1900 (2) X-pro 2 - $1700 (3) X-T2 - $1600 (4) X-E3 - $900

If you have to ask then probably the X-T100 is a better fit for you. Pros of getting the X-T20: (1) magnesium alloy body, lighter weight, slightly smaller size

Just because the X-T100 is newer doesn't mean it's an upgrade. It is better in some areas (newer sensor, selfie screen) though it's a lower class camera - has fewer switches and buttons, AF ...

The M50 (body-only) is $779 and is currently $150 off. It's still a bit more than the X-T100.

I don't get it why you're complaining considering you have a retro Nikon F for your avatar :)

It's not going to happen. Fuji is committed to X-trans it its APS-C cameras.

Nice video but his tripod technique is poor. Not only are 500mm+ shots blurry but extending the thinnest leg sections over the thickest ones is bad practice. No matter if you have a carbon fiber...

FF cameras are quite lower volume than smaller-sensor cameras.
Yes, today Sony basically has near-100% market share in the FF mirrorless camera market but that's bound to change real soon.

True, though they also stated they are moving upscale because of the shrinking camera market.

"they have 19% market share in the ILC and 26% market share in the point and shoot market. (by revenue)"
And how many % by cameras sold?