 |  |  |  |  |
| goodwood g80 20210729 0081-RW2_DxO_DeepPRIMERAH by Trevor Carpenter from Lights camera action 2021 | Temple by kt from Aerochrome Landscapes | Street Musician at San Francisco's Union Square by RBFresno from People Photography - Any Year | Red-necked grebe family by Lu1Wang from Wild family: Ma, Pa & the kids | Northen California Renaissance Fair. Face Painting by RBFresno from Post - processing to tell a stronger story |
Photoeer: Conflating security concerns with privacy issues, with the resulting suboptimal security outcome and loss of one’s privacy is the Merican way.
Thanks for illustrating my point.
Photoeer: Conflating security concerns with privacy issues, with the resulting suboptimal security outcome and loss of one’s privacy is the Merican way.
Thanks for illustrating my point.
Conflating security concerns with privacy issues, with the resulting suboptimal security outcome and loss of one’s privacy is the Merican way.
ppage: The concerns about privacy seem strange given that we live in a society in which more and more people have cell phones with apps like Siri and Google Assistant that are listening to everything they hear and appliances in the home like Alexa that do the same. We seem to have little or no trust in government but unlimited trust in large corporations.
Both government and private industries (or both working together) access to and handling of personal data and privacy issues are a worry to anyone paying attention.
If only there was some technology to have a direct unprocessed connection from subject to eye, maybe some high tec material that gathers transmits light without distortion…. If only
Lees Channel: Well, disregarding Portuguese law due to unfamiliarity, when you are taking photos while on assignment and being paid by your employer to take those photos they belong to the employer. That's true of almost any employment, even medical or scientific. However, in this instance the photo agency is taking such a bizarre stance and bouncing all over the place with contradictory points that they are really weakening their position. Their mindless actions may set a precedent that may upend the photo industry.
Unless you explicitly work for hire, this is not true. I’ve never worked this way- copyright is always mine, the rights I grant vary from assignment to assignment. The grant may be very limited or very opened ended but the images copyright is always mine.
panther fan: If I hire you and you make something that's mine. That's even the case with patents etc... Why should it be different for photos
Patent rights are many times heavily negotiated, as copyright may be also.
Kaj E: If he signed away his copyright in writing, he has no case.
Your law degree is from where?