JakeJY

24mm is simply more versatile as you can always crop for something slightly narrower (like it is ). When using 28mm equivalents, I sometimes find wanting a bit more wide, but I never feel it is too...

Yeah, Panasonic already knew this was a dead end when they picked L-mount. They could have designed a new mount that would be compatible with both, but they chose one that even an adapter would ...

@MobileMILC
Why do people assume they were left out instead of it being their own choice? Using DFD allows them to use off the shelf sensors without needing a PDAF array, which likely reduces their...

Note one thing to consider that may be important. G100 and GX9 has a 1.25x 4K crop. GX85 has only a 1.10x 4K crop. GX85 in the USA model has no 4K recording limit nor AVCHD recording limit. If you ...

Wasn't the point of this thread that there is concern that a stacked sensor would be too expensive for even a OM5? For E-PL it would be even worse. If you are instead implying another new lower end ...

Yes, that's what I meant, although my wording is confusing. I think the E-M1 II sensor is fine and still quite good. I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be quite happy with a GF successor (or ...

@Txoni
The other cover can be glass. Usually there is a cover that encases everything, so that is not a concern at all.

Presuming the OM-5 is still following E-M5 lineage (not a different one where Olympus flips the numbering convention), I don't see OIympus coming up with a completely new sensor. Seems to make ...

As pointed out by others, I don't think this is true. There's a couple factors at play. Due to the small size of the lenses and the volume produced (millions to hundreds of millions), the type of...

As you say, there is a high res Sony 4/3" sensor already, so Olympus certainly can use a variant of that. However, I would be surprised if the rumored OM-5 would use that sensor, as that would ...

What's the equivalent full res RAW speed for the Fuji? As far as I can find, the camera can't shoot faster than 40 fps in RAW (AF/AE locked or not), and even in 6K video, max is 30 fps. If this is ...

You replied to my comment, so I presumed you were asking me. If you don't want me to respond, that's fine, best of luck in your searching.

You are putting words in my mouth, when did I claim the below? "Then the claims are made that the sensor is slow (false), that 40fps with AF/exposure is slower than non stacked MFT sensor ...

It's simple: a computer with one of the series of GPUs I listed (which gives compute capability 5.0 or higher) will support CUDA 11.2. As per the wiki I linked: "CUDA SDK 11.1 – 11.7 support for ...

Unfortunately, if PCWORLD in the UK is anything like BestBuy here in the US, most of the people working there have no clue about the technical details of the products they sell, they are only ...

I'm referring to the the max sensor speed here, 40 fps is quite slow for a stacked sensor. Also according to others, it's operating in a reduced performance AF mode when on 40 fps. When in a mode ...

"The X-H2's speed can be seen in its impressive maximum burst rate: a little behind the OM-1 but a long way ahead of the a7 IV."
This statement is incorrect. The max burst rate of the OM-1 is...

I don't think it will do much for G9. The X-H series is a GH competitor. And although the sensor is stacked, it only gets 40 fps, which is a bit disappointing. That's slower than non-stacked ...

They are not. The one you clipped mentioned nothing about CUDA and are just general requirements for Workspace in general. The one I linked below does mention CUDA is required. Unless I ...

If you wanted to stick to a small camera, Olympus doesn't really offer much. The only modern alternative is the E-PL series, starting with E-PL7 and newer. You gain 3-axis IBIS and a tilt/selfie ...