Djehuty

Chinese companies typically don’t give a damn about aftersales customer service.

A telephoto lens and a lip reading software sounds like spy stuff

Macro, circular catchlights the fashion industry are so fond of, remote camera hides maybe

Bigger pixels are better for video, phones already overprocess whatever photo or video that they capture and less is more in this scenario.

Cones and rods work in a rather different way and is technically a curved sensor, so not really apples to apples when they come up that figure. Also there’s a matter of how organism process said...

I mean they are rather interchangeable in the use case for photography unless its quad bayer or something and not regular bayer

Because tiny lenses can only resolve so much, if the images off these were truly unprocessed, they’ll be rather diffracted and noisy.

These technical details don’t matter to the average user and not gonna impress photographers.

Camcorder style cameras were far more popular in the 90s

There’s information about it on Youtube, gist of it is if you attach a Gopro to a camera without gyros like a cinecam, you could use the gyro data from the Gopro to stabilise that.

They are entering a rather niche market that already has other players that are likely to be cheaper.

They should really move on from the football shape and make it more modular and gimbal friendly

Wish I knew about gyroflow earlier, could have experimented with gyrostabilising Prores raw. Used to need a gyro module for the gyro data.

Well not exactly, the DJI 4D and Mavo LF have adapters for the E-mount, so its not totally closed off, probably won’t work well with AF lenses like most mirrorless ones are.

Isn’t Earth a moon of the Sun?

Yeah the problem is going to a place that’s not light polluted

So I can summon Cthulu now?

Didn’t need to announce this 🤣

Always perceived Zeiss as more focused on industrial side of optics and consumer stuff like still lenses were merely Zeiss dipping their toes, even then it was out of most people’s price range...

@Burden he’s not wrong.
Not all Zeiss glass are great.