Elliot H

xPhoenix: Sharp edges and poor ergonomics. I don't care how good the photos are if it's uncomfortable to hold.

Thomas Kachadurian: I'm generally uncomfortable with photography as competitive, but it's a contest so conclusions are required.

I think there were significantly more compelling and interesting photos in the group of finalist DPR posted a few weeks ago. I've seen photos that do more for me here in the forums.

Also, how is a farmer with a calf nature and wildlife?

gordonpritchard: Surprisingly disappointing images. Much better ones to be seen in the dpreview forums.

typhoonka: Understandably, the a7 III is a winner for a 4 years old camera.
We will see what happens when or if the D750 gets updated.
And I don’t care about dslr vs mirrorless battle in any way.

5k5: Or you could just buy a Pentax. ;-)

scoobysnapstories: so, if dslr are over, do they give it away for free? =) lol. i dont mind keeping them.

mxx: Us DSLR fans wil never surrender! Never!!!

Gundamit: Barney drops an article (op/ed?) on the weekend and it's nice to see the comments fly. Was it the title that got you here? "Almost" is a relative term so we could be waiting a while. Wake me up when Canon and Nikon announce the line up of native lenses that will debut with the new mirrorless FF cameras. Lead with good glass and the bodies will follow. ;P

BobT3218: In assessing the camera, one must remember that Oly's prime market is Japan. Cuteness, backed up by functionality, is more highly regarded than in the West. In the more macho male oriented West, we value functionality or the appearance of functionality. We pretend not to be influenced by cuteness. So yes, a cute desirable camera quite capable of producing professional quality prints in the right hands. I'd love to own this camera but would I buy it? Probably not. A great street camera by the way, or an emergency backup for you m4/3 lenses.

Sergey Borachev: What a joke!!! Drop the price to $499 with the kit lens. Then it will be considered. With nothing exciting in this camera, people will just pick the Fuji X-A5 instead. 24MP, 15-45mm OIS lens, .. All for $599.

soundimageplusblog: I've seen lots of positive reviews about this phone camera and I'm puzzled as to why. The images are poor quality and not even close to the latest iPhones. Specs. and a 3x zoom are pretty meaningless if the images disappoint. I was hoping it would be better, but sadly it's actually pretty poor by todays standards. Just what are these reviewers seeing? (Or more accurately NOT seeing!!)

Tog-meister: What Canon should do is offer EVERYTHING the SONY A7 III currently offers, put it in a mag body with shoulder OLED screen, price it at $1000 and call it the Rebel X Mirrorless FF. The advertisement would read, "The new basic standard for the 21st century." Canon would slaughter all the mirrorless players across the board. And it would make a statement, just like the original rebel release and original 5d release. More than reasonably priced and ready to blow all of the competition out of the water.

Elliot H: I have yet to see a pro use a Pentax digital camera

ZeBebito: Stranger Things, Beauty and the Beast (2017), and Justice League.... none of those won any cinematography award as far as I know.