Threlly

Threlly

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Joined on May 8, 2010

Comments

Total: 61, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

Ha ha..open your wallets.
Canon..I tell ya.

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2019 at 21:16 UTC as 87th comment
In reply to:

Anthony McCallister: I don't get it. As far as I know, the RX 100 iii does not take 4K video.

However, and it's a big one, compared to the video on phones it's dynamic range is way way better, in post you can sharpen a little and it improves.
Before I bought my full frame camera I took an iPhone 8, old Sony HDR-CX280E and the RX100III to Japan.
The output from the RX apart from said softness was head and shoulders above the phone and the handicam.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2019 at 15:59 UTC
In reply to:

GoodKnight: With Nikon and Canon mirrorless bodies so much better designed than what Sony has done. You can bet the next A9 will address that shortcoming. With a full line of lenses and such good AF performance all they need is a serious new Pro body and they are there.

lol

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2019 at 05:22 UTC
In reply to:

Anthony McCallister: I don't get it. As far as I know, the RX 100 iii does not take 4K video.

It does very soft looking HD

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2019 at 15:34 UTC

Soft video. cropping. Nope. Sold mine.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2019 at 15:34 UTC as 7th comment
On article Fujifilm GFX 100 sample gallery with Raw conversions (149 comments in total)

£10,000 and no cup holders ?....pfft

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2019 at 11:45 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply

Canon....what.is.wrong.with.you ?

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2019 at 15:37 UTC as 67th comment

Photography ?

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2019 at 18:01 UTC as 67th comment | 2 replies

In-camera stabilization ?

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2019 at 19:14 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies

Why is this on DPr ?

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2019 at 06:20 UTC as 41st comment
On article DPTH app applies simulated bokeh effect to any image (138 comments in total)

Fake is fake

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2019 at 20:29 UTC as 38th comment | 6 replies
On article Ricoh GR III sample gallery (172 comments in total)

Show me the high ISO.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2019 at 16:05 UTC as 50th comment

Durr...duh doy

Leica...money...old rope

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2019 at 18:29 UTC as 96th comment

Partly true, sensor size is part of the answer, bigger has advantages.
Until we see a revolution in the materials used and the way data is read from the sensor sites, then bigger is still better.
The sensor should contain part of the CPU and RAM required to read at higher rates, heat generated by the electronics needs to be reduced, physical effects between sensor sites need to be mitigated somehow.
Whatever happened to the 'single-photosite' sensor mooted a few years back ?

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2019 at 18:57 UTC as 90th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Threlly: I've had a few iPhones, the camera can best be described as 'useable'.
No amount of computational fakery can mitigate a sensor a quarter the size of my pinkie nail.
As for that fine print, what else would you expect of a morally bankrupt tax thieving company ?

Like I said, I cross reference all figures, its the only way to filter out noise and bias in this age.
As for 'fleet street', it was a derogatory name here as far back as the 50's for tawdry reporting.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2019 at 22:57 UTC
In reply to:

Threlly: I've had a few iPhones, the camera can best be described as 'useable'.
No amount of computational fakery can mitigate a sensor a quarter the size of my pinkie nail.
As for that fine print, what else would you expect of a morally bankrupt tax thieving company ?

Fleet Street ?!?!?
Ancient history.
Comparing the reporting of those dinosaurs to the 21st century Guardian is puzzling at best.
Daily Mail ? maybe.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2019 at 22:52 UTC
In reply to:

Threlly: I've had a few iPhones, the camera can best be described as 'useable'.
No amount of computational fakery can mitigate a sensor a quarter the size of my pinkie nail.
As for that fine print, what else would you expect of a morally bankrupt tax thieving company ?

Having worked for them and knowing how they operate sort of go hand-in hand...see ?
As for facts, I sourced them all from The Guardian and crossed checked them using the search feed in my news aggregator. The Guardian regularly posts positive articles about Apple and wins awards for its reporting.

Anyhoo, to cut a long story short. Tiny sensors suck.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2019 at 22:48 UTC
In reply to:

Threlly: I've had a few iPhones, the camera can best be described as 'useable'.
No amount of computational fakery can mitigate a sensor a quarter the size of my pinkie nail.
As for that fine print, what else would you expect of a morally bankrupt tax thieving company ?

Apple make great claims for themselves, I should know, I worked for them, briefly.
They like to pretend they're a notch above the others, note the ad at CES taunting Facebook's privacy fails, but the truth is, they sell things.
They're just another box shifter.
They employ impoverished Chinese workers in work 'prisons' to do it and pocket billions.
They play games with countries tax systems, systems designed to aid their citizens.
Apples game is to claim legality, just not morality, but when your company is sucking countries dry of much needed revenue it's only ever a moral issue,
and teflon Tim doesn't give a rats if your family have healthcare or not.
Just get in line and pay $1300 for a phone with a tiny sensor.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2019 at 22:30 UTC
In reply to:

Threlly: I've had a few iPhones, the camera can best be described as 'useable'.
No amount of computational fakery can mitigate a sensor a quarter the size of my pinkie nail.
As for that fine print, what else would you expect of a morally bankrupt tax thieving company ?

They pay next to nothing in the U.K., along with Google, Amazon and many other corporates.
Apple based themselves in Southern Ireland to avoid tax at first, when that rug was pulled, they off-shored to Luxembourg.
For example, in 2015 they paid 15m, They should have paid 700m.
The effect on vital public services has helped destroy large parts of the NHS and our Police force.
Rats & thieves.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2019 at 21:42 UTC

I've had a few iPhones, the camera can best be described as 'useable'.
No amount of computational fakery can mitigate a sensor a quarter the size of my pinkie nail.
As for that fine print, what else would you expect of a morally bankrupt tax thieving company ?

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2019 at 19:47 UTC as 39th comment | 12 replies
Total: 61, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »