newphotoman

I thank you for your help. This is my first MILS and I started to use the flash. And then I discovered this whole thing. I just want to understand why the monitor is doing it what it's doing. ...

I wasn't using exposure compensation. This is what I did. First I metered the scene without flash. Then I popped the flash up, so now Live view with effects is disabled. I then start turning the ...

okay that would make sense if changing the shutter/aperture or ISO didn't change the brightness/darkness of image being presented in the monitor/viewfinder but it does. And i'm not recomposing or ...

okay, so whatever I'm seeing on the screen has nothing do to with flash. So what is the metering/screen showing me exactly? It can't be live be the live view effect since the flash is enabled. And ...

Oops, a6300

From what I understand when the pop up flash is used live view effects are turned off so what is being displayed? Is it just correct exposure to see framing or is it the final output of the image ...

thank you for the explanation. I just needed to understand why this was happening. I guess this is the future of mirrorless. I wonder if the new Canon R and the Nikon Z6/Z7 will have the same ...

I am more surprised and did not expect this. Sure not all lenses are going to be perfect and I would expect some pin cushioning, barrel distortion, and/or chromatic distortion. But i have never ...

This is an image from my D300 using the DX 16-85mm. Crop sensor lens. Converted straight from NEF JPEG. no post processing and with no lens correction. Nikon No lense correction Completely ...

wow, okay good to know. I did not know that at all. I'm curious what is the reason for this vs non MILS? Is this across all brands?

I have the A6300 as my first MILS and I did some test shots with the 18-135. When I got home, i loaded up the raw image this was what I saw with no lens correction enabled (raw converted to jpeg ...

I prefer to have it into the 5 digit range. Something about 12-15K ISO would be great. But I have been testing the A6300 and it seems like the first batch of tests with all the Chroma noise was ...

I am definitely not getting those results. If I could get the cat result I think i would be very happy. I was at 12000 ISO with NR on low and it came out terrible, much worse than what you are ...

I'm beginning to see that. I notice that the A7SII isn't listed on the photonstophoto site (or I just missed it) but the A7S is. And the A7S looks pretty good in the PDR.

I was taking indoors pics, no motion. I had my living room dimly light. (similar to some of the places I visited) and did my tests. I did meter to the right, I didn't try overexposing for 1 stop, ...

D4 is a different beast than all these other cameras. It also weighs 3 LBS just with the body and battery.

I do try to use flash but not all places allow flash. Some Churches & Museums for example do not like people flashing. When I was in

I was eyeing the D500 a while back but after my last family trip I decided I just needed a lighter and smaller body. My vision has gone a little worse and on bright sunnny days it is hard for me ...

thanks for the help. I can see that now. I didn't see the site before but photonphotos is very useful actual. I will dig into that a little more and see what my options are.

I went to the site above and according to the their PDR list X-T3 ISO PDR 8045       5.23 10183     4.84 A6300 ISO PDR 8045      5.32 10183    4.87 Sony A7 III ISO PDR 8045       6.14 10183     5.81 ...