MacroBokeh

tbcass: It will be interesting to see how well this camera sells. It seems to me, and I could be wrong, that the market for a camera with limited capabilities but offers great IQ in a pocketable size has limited appeal. I say this because the IQ of the 1" pocketable zooms from Sony and Canon have IQ that is nearly indistinguishable from APS-C cameras below ISO 800.

justmeMN: Hmm. I suppose a Canon M100 with 22mm lens would be a potential alternative to this camera.

https://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/slrs/canon_eosm100

jonikon: No internal flash means no deal for me, so I will be keeping my Coolpix A. One of the great things about a camera like this is the ability to use fill flash in sunny conditions because all shutter speeds are flash synced. If the GR IV has a built in flash I will buy it, if I should live that long anyway.

petreluk: What can this camera really do that a high-end mobile phone these days can't? There is a loyal Ricoh fan club so the camera will find a sale but beyond that this seems like something left over from another era. No EVF, no flash, only basic connectivity and software - in 2019? They've left it too late.

PostModernBloke: A distance scale on a 35mm lens, almost as if photographers were interested in focal points and hyper-focal distances. Love this lens just for giving us the distance scale - good old Pentax!!

Dima_467: I like some things from pentax, i had spotmatic, MEsuper, K2, some primes from A, K and M series. But hey. We have to admit - now they are losers.
Where to begin ? All digital era before K1 pentax system positioned as aps-c specialized. But instead of making high-aperture and sharp lenses, they do very strange dark fixes, not always good optically, and quite expensive. And due to the fact that these lenses were very mediocre, they began to distribute them through religious feelings. And indeed, fans of the "limited" series despise tests and graphics, they are confident that their lenses have the magical property of catching "artistic value" of lmage... And then fuji appeared. And they became a real "aps-c - specialized system". For 3 years they have done much more for this than pentax for all the time from "ist d". without any talk about "special sorts of glass" they began to make excellent glasses that could expand the potential of the aps-c format.

Dima_467: I like some things from pentax, i had spotmatic, MEsuper, K2, some primes from A, K and M series. But hey. We have to admit - now they are losers.
Where to begin ? All digital era before K1 pentax system positioned as aps-c specialized. But instead of making high-aperture and sharp lenses, they do very strange dark fixes, not always good optically, and quite expensive. And due to the fact that these lenses were very mediocre, they began to distribute them through religious feelings. And indeed, fans of the "limited" series despise tests and graphics, they are confident that their lenses have the magical property of catching "artistic value" of lmage... And then fuji appeared. And they became a real "aps-c - specialized system". For 3 years they have done much more for this than pentax for all the time from "ist d". without any talk about "special sorts of glass" they began to make excellent glasses that could expand the potential of the aps-c format.

Dima_467: I like some things from pentax, i had spotmatic, MEsuper, K2, some primes from A, K and M series. But hey. We have to admit - now they are losers.
Where to begin ? All digital era before K1 pentax system positioned as aps-c specialized. But instead of making high-aperture and sharp lenses, they do very strange dark fixes, not always good optically, and quite expensive. And due to the fact that these lenses were very mediocre, they began to distribute them through religious feelings. And indeed, fans of the "limited" series despise tests and graphics, they are confident that their lenses have the magical property of catching "artistic value" of lmage... And then fuji appeared. And they became a real "aps-c - specialized system". For 3 years they have done much more for this than pentax for all the time from "ist d". without any talk about "special sorts of glass" they began to make excellent glasses that could expand the potential of the aps-c format.

(unknown member): Great video. Although, A6x00 is basically a tweak of the A6000. Could be candidate to the worst camera of 2019.

ZeBebito: Pentax, call me back once you have a proper full-frame mirrorless system weighing less than 5kg for a body and a nifty lens.

acassino: "New pre-processor bakes noise reduction into Raws, this progressively kills detail as the ISO increases and can't be turned off"

Major FAIL from Pentax.

aris14: Numbers, numbers...
Ιs there another thread of comments for a camera review in which the DPR staff has posted 67 times, i.e 4.75% of total posts..?

Class A: @DPReview
There have been reports that the comparison tool now delivers sharper K-1 II images than before.

Can you confirm that updates took place?

Since the new versions seem to be considerably sharper (according to the reports), does that influence your opinion on the image quality of the K-1 II? Note that in particular (at least in one instance) the JPG file size has increased considerably, a clear sign of more detail/noise being present in the image.

Perhaps the loss of detail isn't as bad as it initially appeared?

There is also a report that states default Lightroom settings yield sharper images than those shown by your tool. This could be fine, as you may be using non-default values for all cameras, but it would be good to confirm that all development parameters were set as intended.