vrvly

Great. Cleaning dust is very hard after all, even if its the one thats already inside when buying.

Finally can several thousand euro camera shoot 8K with the appropriate performance, not this one tho.
Video stream without jelly effect will be also great for sensor usage in VR headsets to make AR look more real.
I would miss a mech sensor closing up when changing lens tho, cleaning with slow vibrations does not help.
Maybe if they added ultrasonic cleaning with some liquid inside camera, it could do something.
While on it, they could add a water cooling so there are no problems with cameras overheating just after hour. And with global warming its going to get even more hot.
Auto detect human/animal eye, de-fish 4mm laowa inside camera, electronic ND, AI video filters(animated, lagged video, AR video, censored one, ghost town etc.), full spectrum for night photography or visible+UV, visible+IR, UV+IR, only UV, only IR modes... Sony got still a lot to improve.

5.5'' was 4K actually.
We should be able to add a screen to camera with the push of cable into the designated connector. Or it could be some practical phone holder with a hinge, I think there is something similar now, but I'm not sure if it got any hinge to act as stock screen replacement.(felt too bulky for me)
Now, even having AR/VR for 1 eye with 4K screen would be like 2023 tech, or just screen roll that you can roll out however much you want.
As opposed to phones, which move to 8'' territory now with foldables.

We shoot stills with phones instead of using cameras in many situations now, they are quite fragile at 1.5K price without case, they offer screen with better viewing experience, like 4 sensors and 4 lens at 1/n of full size camera price.
So the simple Q is,
why such devices have superior experience than more pricy dedicated cameras?

I got a glasses and shoot at impossible angles, so viewfinder is useless part of camera hw for me.
Fully articulating screen is great tech from years back released now, when we got 8'' foldables and VR devices already.
Shooting 60mp with ''1mp'' 3'' screen on 3000euro device... when years old 5.5'' Sony xperia screen goes for 99euro.
Something feels wrong.

Exactly what I want. I will still cry tho as I do not expect readout speed like A1, which makes electronic shutter harder to use professionally. No word did I read about that speed.
3K or wait for A1II's 8K price. Well, its in thousands anyway and getting something useless at that price is quite bad for mental health.
It will still be quite an upgrade for me tho, a lot will depends on my purse, hope it agrees.

But its really a shame there is no removable IR/UV filters in cameras, as it would be doable.
You got to remove it at 3rd party and its permanent.
Still, shooting at full spectrum you get 125% more light, beautiful night sky shots, out of the world IR shots and some more of UV stuff besides galaxies.
People(or companies) are afraid tho of seeing periodic table under extremely thin black shirt, giving like 10% transparency for body parts, while you can do it with 3rd party anyway.
Cameras are not at fault here.

ZV-E1 is actually perfect, just not enough of Mp...

I just wonder what mind decided to close this site, considering it got some value or even it can create some more. Lol, even beginner would be capable of using that.
Anyway, is there some alternative so there is no point?
Really want to know the answer, as I use this site.

...I agree on 35mm, I got now 35-150mm lens but with apsc sensor so it isnt ideal, but someday I will buy ff it will.
Important is to get people you see in the frame without too much trouble - humanic field of view. Though not so wide, but still enough wide to get it done, but also not too wide to not be able to get farther subject sharp.

Just move telescopes to orbit, so simple.

Depends on brand, the best processing for jpegs you can get from Mate30pro or P40pro ultrawide or normal fovs. If its raws, Sony xperia got the best hw, but also samsung - there you can even choose between better resolution or colors.
Some clever things got better like bokeh or night shooting of even stars, galaxies. Photoshop like features or dream like colored person + bw background can do only phones too.
You also cannot compare slim 200g with multiple lens with backpack of lens or bulky camera. Even if you just go to work or to the shop, you have it on you unlike full sized cameras. It makes big difference between nothing and something.... with that something getting better.

Just imagine taking 64mp ordinary bayer raws, possibly hdr raws with google camera, on s20/+ note20, FF alternative is so pricy and bulky in comparison.
Though its not about just Mp, but phones are on road to Gp and last time I saw some event, it was documented on the phones, it means something.
Phones got more competition and upgrades to cameras, basically something new every half to 1 year.
Compared to like sony's apsc cameras, they stay at 25mp with only slight difference as opposed to phones that went from 8mp daylight shooters to 108mp lowlight capable + other FOVs like ultrawide, tele, super-tele. And they still grow. Just where they will be in few years...

Cannot also forget there is jpeg+raw shooting mode, so you may as well not care about processing.
Wonder about video camera though, can you zoom-in-out while shooting? What about bassy loud audio recording(is it like huawei mics)?

camera is not supersharp but ok, super wide and tele is worse,
bad light is way worse(detail). Colors are perfect.
Processing is ok but detail is lost anyway. I thought it was supposed to be sharp no matter the situation.
Still, if there is no comparison, hard to judge anything.

Seriously, hdr on quad bayer even more on huawei is something else, so are big ryyb all sensors, 10x zoom and ability to capture in pitch dark.
Hand tripod, AI video and shadow/person disappearing like features not to mention.
So lucky for all they are not yet in full frame space, or not for customers?
Sony got better, you wont be able to capture 50mp+ raws though.
Just so you know, 150mp is coming to midrange, imagine the raw stills.

FP camera brings something like sony A7 to size of a6100, and how I hate mechanical shutter when you need quiet one, not all cameras got this and its the future, forget mechanical one if its in the way of usability.
What I wish though is more apsc only sensors, quality super wide, fast tele, f0.8, fast tele prime, all of that is missing, forget competition when I use the sony a5100 apsc and the likes. Is it dead? Maybe I should move to FP.

Diapers award incoming.

I expect higher res, new bayer and higher iso. Hopefully it does not affect those.

16 /64mp with remosaic would be great if combined with raw shooting. At least in good lightning.

hopefully also something for apsc only