Lives in Australia Tasmania, Australia
Has a website at
Joined on Jan 25, 2007


Total: 66, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Canon G1 X Mark III pre-production sample gallery (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

gianstam: What I see is
1. Excellent center sharpness
2. Very good extreme corner sharpness
3. Exceptional quality of out of focus areas
4. Good but not excellent high iso performance

I can see this camera as small wide angle tool (the long end as bonus) with Very good performance and mainly small, light and WR.
But are all of these good enough for someone who want to spend 1200$ ?

I can see a lot of lens distortion

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2017 at 22:15 UTC
On article Shooting with a used DSLR kit that cost me just $80 (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

esmues: This little experiment taught me that if you just want a good camera to take nice looking photos in your everyday life,
Seems like another way of saying close enough is good enough
Its a lot of hard work nailing the image right on the old digital cameras of a decade ago, on film cameras are a lot easier. Today’s digital does the job so much better and easier the results count not the process no one sees what goes into making the final result

We just shot a wedding where a back up camera was a Canon 40D, same sensor and vintage as the 400D. Images are fine, client is happy. Yes I could argue that my 5DSR has significant advantages, at least on spec, but the work output of the 40D is still viable today. I am not sure that a current 50 MP camera helps me "nail" images better, down to skill not gear.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2017 at 23:34 UTC
In reply to:

DanielFjall: The days or artificially intelligent drones scouting around finding perfect pictures for us is finally here!

the best bit about AI is finding ways you can mess with it. Personally I'm ready to buy that Canon robot that will take better pictures than mine, gets up before dawn to catch the perfect sunrise and can track those small birds in flight without loosing them.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2017 at 00:37 UTC
In reply to:

Patrick Kristiansen: That third shot is plainly awesome. Really hope to get up north again some time soon, but Lofoten is literally overrun by tourists these days.

show me somewhere that isn't

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2017 at 07:03 UTC
On article Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

CopCarSS: The D850 must be the best. It's the only camera that resolved the peacock feather. The other cameras couldn't come up with anything for that!

Hmm the humble Fuji X-T20 had it in it

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2017 at 04:09 UTC

This probably has as much to do with keeping intellectual property and know how in Japan as it does for the benefit of keeping manufacturing costs competitive. To manufacture in Japan they have to automate, not necessarily because of wages but because they have an ageing population with no new skilled workers interested or available.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2017 at 01:14 UTC as 9th comment

yes, need a manually focussed phone camera

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 01:00 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

straylightrun: Overused words by marketing departments that actually dont mean anything:

- revolutionary
- nanotechnology
- evolution

it will need the "X" if it's to be credible as a camera

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2017 at 09:17 UTC
In reply to:

obsolescence: Lots of flat grays. I think it's unfortunate that modern technology was avoided.

I'm sure that printed versions will look more aunthentic for the method used. But scanned and sampled for web sized mass communication, using a mobile phone and a $9 app could probably replicate the look quite convincingly.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2017 at 02:21 UTC
On article TriLens triple lens holder coming to Kickstarter (165 comments in total)

the tour bus crowd will love them

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2017 at 00:03 UTC as 74th comment

could spend all day with just a 28mm lens, used to think 35 but nowadays I like more in the frame

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2017 at 10:29 UTC as 256th comment
In reply to:

iainlea: Was looking at a US/Canada/Mexico/Hawaii shooting trip this year but due to the constant changes and new requirements with flying we will now plan a number of extended roadtrips here in europe and take a look at island hopping in asia.

The US has great locations and beautiful landscape but so do other countries. At the end of the day we will spend our income in a more welcoming environment.

I am pretty sure other countries tourist departments will try and capitalize on this situation and that can only be good for people looking for good deals.

Please come to Tasmania instead, friendly place, no bans, bring all the cameras you want and go wherever you like with spectacular landscapes and adventure experiences. We need the tourists!

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2017 at 12:09 UTC
In reply to:

Tan68: The point is invalid.

Compact cameras are mature and sales will have slowed for this reason. There is little reason to replace a camera unless it breaks.

While people do use cell phones in place of compact cameras, I believe that, for the purposes of this study, each cell phone is counted as a camera... This is a presumptuous.

1 - I use the camera on my cell phone but it is not a replacement for a compact camera; both types are used based on what I want out of the picture.

2 - I have a drawer full of cheap cell phones that serve different purposes. Most don't have cell service and never see the camera app opened. One is used as an alarm clock.

Certainly it can be argued that my uses (1) & (2) are not typical of all other users and I will agree. However, just as it would be ludicrous for me to insist that my use case is the standard, it is ludicrous to presume each cell phone is a replacement of a dedicated camera.

The monstrous y-axis makes the graph really impressive :^)

I agree, but reality is that for the casual user who may have never considered owning a camera, the one on the phone will be there and available for them should they ever want to take a photo. Statistically that makes them a camera user. Once used to the experience they may think the phone camera is "good enough" for their purposes, or step up to a "real" camera, but more consumers and businesses now see the camera in the phone as a tool that does the same job as would have previously been done only through a photographic camera. The sobering aspect is that camera sales peaked some years ago, so the technology hasn't advanced enough to make it compelling to replace older cameras or buy new ones, whereas phones are now within reach of more people.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 01:44 UTC

You wonder if these marketing, strategic execuitve bureaucrat types ever go out on the weekend with the 5D or 750D or whatever and actually take some shots. Lots of product placement talk, very little passion.

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2017 at 23:25 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

expressivecanvas: I'm actually surprised that so many comments below mention predictions of Nikon being bought by another camera manufacturer. What does Nikon have to offer that would interest any camera manufacturer?

Nikon seems to have backed themselves into a corner, precariously close to positioning themselves out of competition. It seems to me that Nikon is following more closely in Kodak's footsteps of terribly poor management resulting in products nobody really needs including other camera manufacturers rather than continuing to build a portfolio which could be desirable to other camera manufacturers as well as consumers.

when all we wanted was a follow up to the D300 and D700 series, they went into almost MF territory with the D800s and the Leica analog body with digital sensor thing with the Df and Nikon boutiques, only releasing replacement products to their most succesful platform perhaps a bit too late.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 07:15 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (450 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: Canon is killing Nikon!!

Nikon killing Nikon?

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 06:58 UTC
On article New Canon EOS 77D sits between Rebel T7i and EOS 80D (52 comments in total)

how many more price points do they need to cover? Same stuff with a few more or less plastic bits and new model number.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 06:56 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Olympus E-M1 Mark II Iceland sample gallery (83 comments in total)
In reply to:

spatz: If I posted these pictures on facebook after a trip to Iceland, my friends would wonder why I bothered taking a camera. I don't particularly like Steve Huff's reviews, but on the same trip, he seems to have been able to take some much more interesting photos.

Have to agree, was there 3 weeks ago,(other end of the Earth from Tasmania) with 2 cameras and my phone (S7), and some of these don't look much better than what the S7 gave me. Perhaps they didn't have much time to set up, and it can be crowded, but the way highlights are blown at the Skogar waterfall for example doesn't fill me with confidence about this camera being an improvement

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 11:57 UTC

any explanation on the RAW processing (will it be supported by Lightroom for example?) my S7 has RAW shooting but needs an app to view them. Sorry if the question has been asked already, I couldn't find any comment on it.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 00:15 UTC as 358th comment | 1 reply
On article Hasselblad to announce 'game changer' next week (454 comments in total)

game changer = film camera?

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2016 at 04:46 UTC as 131st comment | 1 reply
Total: 66, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »