mpgxsvcd

Lives in United States USA, NC, United States
Works as a Jack of all Trades
Joined on May 17, 2004

Comments

Total: 2155, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »

I am not impressed. Said no one, ever.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 10:07 UTC as 155th comment | 2 replies

Always shoot RAW and make sure your camera is ISO invariant for this type of shot. If the camera is not ISO invariant you wouldn't be able to pull the shadow details at all without emphasizing the noise greatly.

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2017 at 17:29 UTC as 72nd comment
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: You lost me at "We shot JPGs".

You can make RAW look like anything you want it to. That is the point of RAW.

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2017 at 14:42 UTC

You lost me at "We shot JPGs".

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2017 at 22:40 UTC as 306th comment | 6 replies

The key is to know your equipment and to practice before hand. Learn what can go wrong before it really matters.

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2017 at 14:09 UTC as 20th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: If the subject is stationary in good light can't you just shoot a bunch of 20 Megapixel images of it and make a 10,000 Megapixel image?

For $2.5 million, yes absolutely I want to see the bacteria on the car so I can get it off.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2017 at 18:57 UTC

"those desperate to buy the camera do have other options." Like Sony, Panasonic..... etc

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2017 at 18:44 UTC as 70th comment | 1 reply

If the subject is stationary in good light can't you just shoot a bunch of 20 Megapixel images of it and make a 10,000 Megapixel image?

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2017 at 18:42 UTC as 27th comment | 3 replies

I find it interesting that they shoot the car with a $50,000 100 Megapixel camera and then upload the video in 1080p. The Panasonic GH5 can shoot 4K @ 59.94 FPS HDR for $2000. Such a waste.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2017 at 18:40 UTC as 28th comment | 1 reply

Sounds Amazing!

........... And the price?

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 18:41 UTC as 9th comment | 3 replies

Was anyone else not that impressed by the Red and actually a little surprised that a $50 camcorder even exists?

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 18:31 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply

They used the wrong $50 camera. There are much better options than that in that price range.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 18:27 UTC as 42nd comment | 1 reply
On article Blackmagic Video Assist 4K review (28 comments in total)

Good thing my GH5 can record 4k/UHD @ 30 FPS 10 BIT 4:2:2 internally and in a few weeks it will be 400 mb/sec ALL-I. It even does 4k/UHD @ 60 FPS 8 BIT 4:2:0.

It really is incredible how many features they packed into the GH5 and still kept its price under $2000.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 13:26 UTC as 12th comment | 7 replies

Just curious what advantages time lapse has over video?

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 16:22 UTC as 41st comment | 3 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 Review (1206 comments in total)

The specs say that the camera can shoot 48 FPS. However, I have not found any way to make it shoot 48 FPS with sound. Is there an error in the review?

Link | Posted on Jul 5, 2017 at 20:37 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with Canon EOS Rebel SL2 / EOS 200D (235 comments in total)

Tiny is not the word I would have used to describe that camera.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 10:16 UTC as 42nd comment | 2 replies

No matter what we say about it loads of people will buy this camera. They will think they bought the latest and greatest in camera technology simply because Canon is all they know.

Those people probably will be satisfied with the pictures and photos they get from it. It is a capable camera that can produce great results in the right hands.

Canon really has figured out the market. They know that most people HATE doing research on electronics. They know that most consumers just ask their friends what to buy or they watch a YouTube video about it.

Most people aren't here on Dpreview at 5:00 AM for release day making fun of Canon's latest half hearted effort. Canon knows this so they will continue their trend of making modest upgrades year after year as the competition continues to run circles around them.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 09:58 UTC as 25th comment | 43 replies

This will be a fine camera that many people will produce extraordinary footage with. For what it does the price seems appropriate. If I could afford that price range I know I could produce amazing things with it.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 13:19 UTC as 30th comment | 5 replies

Rishi is my hero. Great job as always finding out the truth about these cameras. The A9 has some limitations but speed isn't one of them.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 18:53 UTC as 36th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2746 comments in total)

Rishi is my hero. Great job as always finding out the truth about these cameras. The A9 has some limitations but speed isn't one of them.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 18:53 UTC as 283rd comment
Total: 2155, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »