Doug Pardee

Doug Pardee

Lives in United States Wilmington, NC, United States
Joined on May 28, 2005

Comments

Total: 274, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

The most obvious point on Fujifilm's side is that Polaroid stopped making that film in 2008, and indicated no intent of producing more, so the trademarks became abandoned three years later (US law). Courts have the option to recognize that an abandoned trademark retains some residual goodwill, but they almost never extend that more than five years past abandonment.

There's also the question of whether PLR's current owner Slava Smolokowski comes with "clean hands", having produced similar instant film with the Impossible Project prior to his acquisition of PLR.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2017 at 17:42 UTC as 30th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Sdaniella: kodak had never got their ektachromes to overcome color degradation over time
to match color stability of its kodachromes

so, better digitally scan your ektachrome images just in case you want the images many decades later

According to Wilhelm Research (the folks who produce most of the longevity figures), Kodak's Ektachrome started beating Kodachrome in stability starting in 1988. The old E-3 and E-4 process Ektachromes had very poor stability, but the post-1988 Ektachromes had the greatest longevity of any slide film. Wilhelm rated post-1988 Ektachrome as having a lifetime of 220 years (vs. 185 for Kodachrome).

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 22:56 UTC
In reply to:

Paul Petersen: Nothing like trying to rewrite fair use law.

(@Paul) Not sure who you meant here... CBS or Tannen. Or both.

Regardless, (at least in the US), "fair use" only has meaning as a defense in a lawsuit. You can't claim "fair use" until you're sued. Then it's up to the court to decide if it's really fair or not.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 22:34 UTC

If you ask me, it's a Marketing Dept. fail. These were essentially a fashion accessory, not a practical product. The initial sales were because when you're the only one in your circle with them, you're special (or at least that's your fantasy when you buy them). The sales collapse is because when almost everybody has them -- or could have them -- you have no illusion they'll make you special.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 19:49 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply

Something not mentioned in the press release: will the future versions of Nik still be usable as plugins and standalone, or will they be strictly for DxO Optics Pro?

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 15:36 UTC as 85th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Clyde Thomas: In this age when latest Nikon/Sony continue using outdated protruding metal strap lugs from 1940's... This little retro Yashi finally does away with them.

Not judging... Just noting.

That seems to be only on the prototype. Toward the end of the Kickstarter page, you'll find shots of the Y35 with leather strap attached to ordinary strap lugs. It might appear that the strap lugs are only on the limited edition, but in the Kickstarter comments Yashica says, "strap lugs is on all models, no worry".

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2017 at 18:36 UTC

Nobody else was amused by this bit at the very end of the NikonRumors translation: "Nikon has a lot more failure experience than Sony."?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2017 at 19:38 UTC as 155th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Androole: The only thing I'm interested here is the supposedly new Bayer Filter technology they're talking about...

Any chance we could get a tech article?

So if the red sensel sees the yellow and the green sensel doesn't, how is that different from seeing red?

Or if the red sensel doesn't see the yellow, and the green sensel doesn't see the yellow, how is that different from seeing black?

It's absolutely mandatory that the color responses overlap. As stated, digital color is determined by the difference in the responses to the wavelength. To do that, the wavelength *must* be picked up by sensels of more than one color. The cones in the human eye have very wide response:
https://deron.meranda.us/ruminations/purple/eyecurve.png

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 12:45 UTC
In reply to:

Androole: The only thing I'm interested here is the supposedly new Bayer Filter technology they're talking about...

Any chance we could get a tech article?

That "pure colors" stuff doesn't sound at all right to me. The ability to produce a full spectrum from just three colors absolutely depends on overlaps in sensitivity.

As an example: yellow isn't either red or green. But without overlaps, it'll only activate either red or green, so it'll appear as either red or green. Or, if it falls in between the red and green sensitivity, it'll appear as black.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2017 at 15:28 UTC
In reply to:

love2travelfar: Anyone cares about those? Honestly there is only room for something high-end,
an amazing medium format RX1 or something similar for example.
Everything else is covered by iPhones...

This camera has 24-600 (35mm-eq) optical zoom. The iPhone... not so much.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2017 at 14:36 UTC
In reply to:

Grumpyrocker: The new app is poor. It doesn't offer the option to ignore RAW files and just upload JPG files to Google Photos. The previous app had this.

This one caught me when I switched over some months back. I got a nastygram from Google saying I'd used up all my space. And I'm like, "But I said to upload in the smaller, unlimited space resolution. How can I be out of unlimited space? Is this like my wireless phone company where 'unlimited' means 'limited'?"

So I looked around, and I didn't see many new files in my photos. After more rooting around, I found a backup section separate from photos, and it was full of Raw files and whatnot. I shut down the process on my computer, then deleted the backup section on the Web. (Deleting it all wasn't easy and it wasn't fast.)

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2017 at 22:54 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-E3 Review (736 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikhail Konovalov: Does the "Auto" switch disable RAW recording? If so, it shouldn't be listed under advantages. Flip it by mistake and lose the RAWs you thought you would have.

In the year+ that I've owned my X-T10, I've never accidentally flipped the Auto switch. On my camera, it's pretty hard to do. The switch doesn't move easily, and there's not much space between the dials on the "push to Auto" side of the switch to allow you to accidentally snag it. There's a lot more room on the "push it back off of Auto" side.

And for the record: yes, Auto produces JPEG only. Further, it's only Provia film simulation with all adjustments set to 0, except in the SR+ super-auto scene mode, where you have the option of selecting B&W or Sepia as alternatives to Provia.

Fuji Provia JPEGs are fairly malleable in post. Obviously you lose a bit of shadow DR. Perhaps more of an issue, you get some Fuji noise reduction baked in, and Fuji's NR isn't widely beloved. Still, given that the Auto mode is going to get pretty close to the appropriate exposure, not having Raw isn't a disaster.

To my knowledge, the Canon DSLRs that have scene modes also are JPEG-only in those modes.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2017 at 22:18 UTC
On article Hands-on with new Fujifilm X-E3 (204 comments in total)
In reply to:

Absolutic: Just finished watching the 30 min long big taco video on YouTube comparing xe3 with xt20 I have. So xe3 is the first Fuji xe camera NOT made in Japan, now made in China. He suggests it is because it is a consumer model now. The auto mode suggests consumer too. Also flash xsync is 1/180 which again says consumer. Ok, but if you are doing a cheaper consumer model, why remove a built-in flash? It is not like xe3 is a weatherproof body and you need to remove
The flash for better sealing.

The X-T10 was made in Thailand, not China.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2017 at 13:56 UTC
On article Hands-on with new Fujifilm X-E3 (204 comments in total)
In reply to:

Absolutic: Just finished watching the 30 min long big taco video on YouTube comparing xe3 with xt20 I have. So xe3 is the first Fuji xe camera NOT made in Japan, now made in China. He suggests it is because it is a consumer model now. The auto mode suggests consumer too. Also flash xsync is 1/180 which again says consumer. Ok, but if you are doing a cheaper consumer model, why remove a built-in flash? It is not like xe3 is a weatherproof body and you need to remove
The flash for better sealing.

A very minor point: the X-E2S also had the Auto mode. It was activated by a button rather than a switch.

Flash sync is 1/180 on all Fujifilm ILC models except 1/250 on X-Pro2 and X-T2 and 1/125 on GFX 50S. Many people report no problems using 1/250 on the cameras spec'ed for 1/180.

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2017 at 13:11 UTC

It should be made clear that this isn't THE Lily. It's a Mota drone with the Lily name.

Mota acquired the rights to Lily marketing assets including the customer list and the Lily brand name.

The technical assets were sold to a different company: LR Acquisition LLC. I haven't seen much information as to who is behind LR Acquisition aside from the name "Michael Bailey".

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 17:27 UTC as 19th comment | 11 replies

They probably would've gotten off more lightly if they'd been able to come back down and be quietly arrested. However, according to other reports, they got scared about the descent, so the bridge had to be closed while the Port Authority's High Angle Rescue Team brought them safely back down.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2017 at 20:29 UTC as 88th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

FuhTeng: Good idea, but still wouldn't be of much use in a house fire or tornado or other crisis with no or little warning - your files are still toast. How to handle that?

This isn't a backup device. It's a primary storage device with large capacity and convenient network access.

You should have separate backup arrangements.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2017 at 19:43 UTC
In reply to:

deep7: The real headline could have been that Canon beat Sony to that title. After all, the A99Mk2 would have been a pretty serious contender, surely? More so than any recent Nikon anyway! Nothing against the Canon though. It is a very well-developed product which does an excellent job.

The A99-II isn't a DSLR. The viewfinder is electronic, not reflected optical.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2017 at 10:38 UTC
In reply to:

havoc315: Does it really make sense to separate "compact system" from dSLR? Especially, look at the award for the Sony 70-200/2.8 -- This lens is not "compact"... it's the same size as a 70-200/2.8 lens for a Canon or Nikon dSLR... And it's unfair to compare this to lenses that are built for m4:3 systems..
Calling the A9 the camera of the year.. but the 5div the best professional dSLR...
But the A9 is a professional camera?

The A9 is not a DSLR. It would be in the category of Professional Compact System ("mirrorless") camera, for which there was no separate award, probably because it would merely duplicate the Camera of the Year award.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 20:34 UTC
In reply to:

Anadrol: What is the best HDR software ? Who tried several ? Thanks :)

Would be great for this site to review them by the way.

@Sannaborjeson I've seen grotesque pictures that were clearly Photoshopped to death. Does that mean that Photoshop=bad taste?

HDR is a powerful tool for dealing with scenes that have higher dynamic range than your camera can capture, and for rendering HDR scenes into a viewable and printable dynamic range. Even with non-HDR photos, It lets you lift shadows and open highlights without sacrificing the overall contrast of an image.

Yes, if you push really hard, you'll get unrealistic results. The same can be said for ordinary contrast and saturation controls. But used deftly, HDR tools can produce some excellent results from challenging source images.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 10:41 UTC
Total: 274, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »