LadyGaGa

Lives in United States United States
Joined on May 10, 2010

Comments

Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Magnum signed square print sale returns for third year (85 comments in total)

@Suntan - You are a true miserable classless dick!

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2016 at 21:59 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
On article Magnum signed square print sale returns for third year (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: Are these the Photoshop version from Steve McCurry?

What an ass!

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2016 at 21:54 UTC
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (737 comments in total)
In reply to:

SeeRoy: Of course DSLRs focus better and are therefore better for wildlife photography...
Unfortunately only for those wildlife photographers who don't walk far from the car.
For those of us for whom all kinds of photography involve walking long distances in the countryside, lugging along a backpack plus extra clothing, plus food, plus drink, adding 20 lb+ of DSLR and lenses (600 F4 anybody?) is a PIA.
Trading the DSLR benefits for increased range and mobility will often produce better photographic opportunities.
But of course by now the pix are usually secondary to the gear and notional "IQ" - in most senses of the acronym.

@halfwaythere - your handle tells us all we need to know about you.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2016 at 16:49 UTC

Hipster click bait.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2015 at 01:41 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

kirbysdl: So how do you actually download it? I just see a big gray box at the bottom saying that they won't share my email address. No links, no form for entering my email. Do I have to sign up for their normal services to get the PDF?

I've tried different OSes, browsers, ISPs, etc. No ad blockers either.

If someone can share the file without requiring jumping through these hoops, I wouldn't complain too much.

If you can't figure out something this simple you don't need it.

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2015 at 21:00 UTC
In reply to:

Horshack: Canon is rumored to be spinning off its sensor division as well, with the name 'Demode Sensor Technologies, Inc'.

How many stupid meaningless phucking posts are in this thread? What a bunch of juvenile wankers!

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2015 at 02:13 UTC
On article Cinetics Axis360 review (70 comments in total)

@riskinhos - You are a phucking moron. These are manufactured items not raw materials!

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2015 at 15:18 UTC as 5th comment
On a photo in the Sony RX10 II real-world samples sample gallery (7 comments in total)

Cainn24 you are such ass.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 23:17 UTC as 1st comment
On article Capture One Pro 8 software review (323 comments in total)
In reply to:

sh10453: There is a good number of free products available, and they have plenty of teeth in them.
LightZone, Picturenaut, SilkyPics (free version which comes with Panasonic cameras), and RAWTherapee are some examples.

It would be nice (and certainly useful to the fans and readers) if DPR would review and COMPARE these products among themselves and with some commercial ones.

Another inexpensive product ($40 to $80, much cheaper if not the latest version), which is a full fledged graphics editor, and it can handle RAW images as well, is Corel's Paint Shop Pro (probably the oldest graphics editor still in existence for PC's) is worth a full review

I'm not a fan of the outrageous prices in the $500, $600, ..., $1200 range.

Any readers opinions / support to this request? Please keep it simple and minimal.

@sh10453

"Any readers opinions / support to this request? Please keep it simple and minimal."

I love how you like to exercise prior restraint to someones reply.

Tell me what editing package cost $500 to $1200?

You can subscribe to Adobe PS/LR 2015 for $9.99 per month.

That was the moronic part of your comment. I could say more but I've been warned to be brief.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2015 at 23:23 UTC
On article Capture One Pro 8 software review (323 comments in total)
In reply to:

sh10453: There is a good number of free products available, and they have plenty of teeth in them.
LightZone, Picturenaut, SilkyPics (free version which comes with Panasonic cameras), and RAWTherapee are some examples.

It would be nice (and certainly useful to the fans and readers) if DPR would review and COMPARE these products among themselves and with some commercial ones.

Another inexpensive product ($40 to $80, much cheaper if not the latest version), which is a full fledged graphics editor, and it can handle RAW images as well, is Corel's Paint Shop Pro (probably the oldest graphics editor still in existence for PC's) is worth a full review

I'm not a fan of the outrageous prices in the $500, $600, ..., $1200 range.

Any readers opinions / support to this request? Please keep it simple and minimal.

SilkyPics suks along with RawTherape. In short your response is moronic.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2015 at 16:38 UTC
In reply to:

Albert Macfarlane: It is interesting that Niepce (or maybe Daguerre) in the 1830-40 decade was the last person on earth who could truly say that he had personally examined all of the photographic images which currently exist. Every photographer since that time either lived in other geographic areas as the technique spread across the world, or was simply overcome by the mass of images.
Mike Johnston recently pointed this out in one of his columns.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2015/03/the-old-question-revisited.html

Problem is Mike Johnson is an idiot.

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2015 at 13:20 UTC
On article Lomography adds Lomochrome Turquoise film to lineup (91 comments in total)

I want to vomit now. Thanks Lomo!

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 01:15 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Diopter: really "sustainable" is not printing at all.
( That's what most of the people do )

Ah yes, another internet sexual intellectual. Tell Rich us how you are going to save the planet and then the universe.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 02:36 UTC
In reply to:

Lucas_: I do RAW conversion, noise control and minor editing with Silkypix Pro 6 and final editing on PS CS6 Extended. I never liked LR since it's more a file management software than anything else. AFAIK LR has the same RAW engine as PS CS ( ACR ).

You know, nobody gives a s**t about these complaints. Either pony up the money or move along. Photography has always been a black hole for money and always will be.

If you don't like Adobe go use Gimp and see how you like that.

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2014 at 21:15 UTC
On article Lomography seeks crowdfunding for Lomo'Instant Camera (41 comments in total)

Who gives a s**t? This is another unethical crowd funding ripoff by Lomo. Besides who wants to use crappy instant film. I quit instant film photography when Polaroid died.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 00:44 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Street photography tips with Zack Arias (152 comments in total)

Oh yeah Arias is a Fuji whore.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 22:09 UTC as 40th comment | 2 replies
On article Street photography tips with Zack Arias (152 comments in total)

> Photographer Zack Arias is particularly known for is his street work ...

I've never regarded Arias as a street photographer at all, not sure where that notion comes from. He hails from Atlanta as I do and he has no local recognition as a street photographer.

His notoriety in part stems from his studio work with a single light source.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 22:05 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

svx94: If Nikon pay attention to Fuji's X forums, and how many Nikon-Fuji adapters sold, it is not hard to figure out that those are the people Nikon LOST (with me being one of them). Nikon 1 is a disaster, face it.

@yabokkie - "Fuji do not have good camera, nor they have good lens."

Where do you come up with such nonsense?

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2013 at 01:21 UTC
In reply to:

tjbates: Wow, and they had a chance to give us a 35mm equivalent lens like the Olympus 17mm but instead just gave us a silver version of a lens that doesn't need replacing. The 20mm 1.7 is on my camera permanently but this announcement looks so uninspiring and lazy on the part of Panasonic especially without focus speed improvement or manual focus ring dampening improvement.
Will we see an AF100 video camera in red next instead of updating it with 4:2:2 codec or replacing it all together to at least keep up with the competition?
Cynical marketing? The buyer has the last say.

@Yabokkie - You are an ignorant dick! Why do you keep embarrassing yourself with these stupid posts?

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2013 at 17:26 UTC
On article Exhibition Review: 8x10 By Impossible (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

MartinaB: Just beautiful. Photography is amazing now, but it was amazing back when. I have done some big format work and there is something intangible , hard to describe about it. If you can go see the show! If you can, buy an old 8x10 and try this film. Be patient and you will be rewarded.

I've used 8x10 for decades and made tons of alternative process prints. I understand and embrace the concept of wabi-sabi. The examples shown are very creative and exploit the characteristics of the film.

Having said that I also think this product is way over priced CRAP and never plan to use it.

Youngsters purchase good film and support film manufacters this stuff is dodo.

Oops I'm repeating myself.

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2012 at 03:19 UTC
Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »