Clayton1985

+1.  You might as well go for the system that appears to have the better native lenses for you.   As better lenses are released I think many people sell their adapted lenses even if they didn't ...

I'm not familiar with qDslrDashboard but I do recall another thread discussing this and I believe there were comments that it would be available.   You might be able to search and find that thread.

And the Sony cameras can do a great job of handling all sorts of inclement weather including heavy rain and there are videos to prove it so I'll agree that the AF-C can be superb if you'll agree ...

As I said in my first post the Photography Life review is the best review for the Z7 yet because they are thorough enough and willing to take on the negatives like the AF-C performance and yet ...

Yes, for interval shooting and timelapse movie there is a silent photography option in the menu for each.  You can also enable silent photography to use with an external intervalometer.

I think you're splitting hairs here and avoiding the subject so I'm not really sure what you mean in the above post.   If you're saying that "examples of photos where Z did a superb focus" proves ...

I think it was suggested in the post before mine...

I agree if we were talking about my words vs theirs...  but in spite of you trying to say otherwise, we aren't.  But hey we can check back in a few months after all of the dust has settled and see ...

You can get very good shots with the worst AF system out there if you try hard enough and long enough.   I'm trying to understand how this shows how good the Z7 AF-C is?   If the reviewers you're ...

Personally I trust reviews by Nasim Mansurov a lot, especially when combined with many other reviews that more or less say the same.   You can claim that the Z7 continuous AF is superb but the ...

In my opinion this is by far the best review to date with a very good balance between covering the positives like build quality, EVF and IBIS and not shying away from the negatives like the FTZ ...

They have been easy to find since day one for the most part.   Sometimes the body only and the bundles with FTZ adapter have been out of stock but in general there hasn't been an issue finding ...

Fuji is to firmware updates what micro 4/3 is to f2.8.    People just feel better seeing f2.8 on their lens instead of f5.6 and people just feel like they've gotten something for nothing when Fuji ...

Once you change your studio scene to comparison view instead of full which is how they should be compared then there is almost no difference.

It appears to me that Nikon decided that size/weight wasn't at the top of their list and instead they prioritized ergonomics and lens performance.   Sony took the opposite approach and first ...

And likewise.   I offered my .02 just as you did.

What extra stop are you talking about?    The low light performance of the A7III and A7rIII are basically the same.

That's an odd point of view IMO. Images taken with phones or cameras set to auto or using a scene mode or using a lightroom preset or with other "canned" adjustments absolutely should be claimed ...

I assume you hope to take images that you keep for years.   Will the answers to your question today be the same in 5 years?   How about 10 years?

Well, there is no one size fits all list of what someone might be missing so I don't know that you're missing anything which is kind of my point.  If you aren't aware of any limitations or issues ...