Clayton1985

I didn't keep up with the count but I did determine that I like the A9 and 1DxII results much more than the D5.

The 90 f2.8 will work just fine if this is the focal length you want.   You also have the Sony, 50 f2.8, Zeiss 50 f2.8, and several manual focus native macro lenses.   From there you can also ...

If you've ever used the 12-100 you would see how capable that camera/lens combination is regardless of sensor size.   You're right that IBIS is primarily for static subjects but for some people ...

And you'd need an even faster lens on a 1" sensor superzoom.   I do think the gains from the arguably better IQ of a lens like the Olympus 12-100 and the for sure better IS help offset some of the ...

If I were taking a trip like this with the A7rII and limited to two lenses I would probably take the 16-35 f4 and the 55 f1.8.    What I would actually take is the A6300, 10-18 f4, 16-70 f4 and a ...

Personally unless you really count on the 17-50 f2.8 a lot I would consider just selling all of your A mount system in a package deal and get all E mount.   I think you'll enjoy the A6300 or A6500 ...

Sure I think Sony could do something similar in aps-c in a fixed lens camera but that's not the same as the A6500.   I linked to pictures of many of the current 16-50/17-50 f2.8 aps-c lenses.   ...

The only thing you mention needing is the useful range of 24-70 but then you dismiss the 24-70 f4, do you have a specific need for f2.8 or is it more about IQ?    The difference in weight and size ...

I agree about the touchscreen even though I have to admit I never use them as much as I think I will but it's nice to have. As for the Panasonic menus, I never liked them so I'd rather keep the ...

I'm sure that your RX100 needs a faster lens if you want to approximate the IQ of a 16-50 f2.8 aps-c lens mounted to aps-c cameras.    That is what matters right?   Otherwise, using the RX100 as ...

The RX100 is equivalent to about f5-f8 while the a 16-50 aps-c would be equivalent to about f4. In other words the current 16-50 f3.5-f5.6 is a more accurate comparison to the RX100.   The RX100 ...

A 16-50 f2.8 is a lens Sony should run away from.    It's either going to be too big and heavy like the Fuji lens or too many compromises like the current 16-50 lens.    In either case it's a bad ...

The D850 looks like a great camera but I'm curious to understand what specific features or combination of features make it your dream camera?    I don't really see anything that makes the D850 ...

I think you're talking about your preferences but presenting them as if they're considered to be facts.  The Nikon DSLRs that don't have a tilt screen and don't have adequate live view and are too ...

I think the D850 shows how much Sony is pushing the competition and the D850 looks like a really good camera with improvements in a lot of the areas that needed to be improved.    If one of the ...

IMO, a 16-50 f2.8 will be big and heavy and expensive or it will have lots of compromises and won't improve all that much over the lenses being criticized.    I don't think it matters anyway ...

Meh.... those that want Sony to limit a lens to only aps-c to gain 10%-20% just want what they want without any care to consider the big picture and the impact that has on the Sony's ability to ...

It's hard to compare because the Fuji 10-24 is between the 10-18 and the 12-24 Sony lenses but it appears to me that the Sony 12-24 is better optically than the other two...  so, could the 12-24 ...

I'm not sure I've ever been told why I should care if a lens is "native aps-c E mount" or not? A lens is either the size, weight, performance and price that works for me or it isn't?? The 24 f1.8 ...

+1 for the Mirrorless Mover bags.   I don't have the 30i but I do have the smaller one and it seems to be designed in the way the OP wants.