Virtual Photon

Mirrorless cameras/lenses don't back focus because you are focussing right on the sensor.  So there is no adjustment.

Heat haze.  Slight missed focus.  Slight tripod shake.  All possible.  Unless this happens consistently then it's in all likelihood user error ( but note that I don't mean pejoratively - shake ...

I don't think it has anything to do with HighRes.  I believe it is similar to the preview function on an iPhone.  Whenever you half press the shutter button, the camera begins recording frames and ...

What is confusing to me is that it is not at all clear that he has ever actually had his hands on the camera.  Conjecture about how the camera might perform is just more marketing fluff.  Not sure ...

No way could I fit an F150 in my garage.

Martin, I too have looked around for some inkling of a list price but haven't found anything definitive.  I thought there was some talk by an Olympus official that it was going to be consistent ...

Maybe I missed it but did anyone see a proposed list price on this new puppy?

Ah, thanks. Ok so I was asking the wrong question. The question I want to ask is about the relative pixel area of a stacked vs aps-c vs ff . . .?

Economies of scale tend to work against that - but that depends upon what the cost of the sensor is in relation to the cost of the rest of the components.  I don't know that but I'm guessing that ...

I assume one of the advantages of a 3d stacked sensor is larger pixel pitch because the circuitry real estate is stacked instead of adjacent.  Can someone tell me what the pixel pitch would be on ...

I'm trying to resist this . . . and you're not helping. Are those crops or just downsized for web? Handheld? (your shutter speeds are certainly fast enough for HH).

I'm coming from a D7100 (still have the D750). I find all the usual is true - More noise at high ISO, slightly less resolution, new menu system to learn, tracking is not as good with moving objects. ...

Richard, Yes, nice shots.  The reduced resolution is frustrating though as I suspect the detail is much crisper than what these appear.  Were these all hand-held? VP

The OP got the latin name right though  . . .

I don't know about Canon.  I've used the 300 f4 for BIF with very good results.  The 80-400 is almost as good.  These are all hand-held.  They are reduced but might give you some idea of what can ...

At 1270 x 947, you are not going to see differences between the 17 and 12-32 certainly at f5.6 and not from a SOOC jpeg.    If you want to stick with SOOC jpeg, you might want to consider playing ...

I'm curious as to what you mean by "sharpness could be better on some photos"? If some photos are acceptable and some are not, then it is a technique problem, not a lens problem.

+1 for Bhima78 above. Of those three PL15 makes the most sense, particularly for Europe. You'll probably end up using it inside as well and a wider FL makes sense there as well.

Why don't you think it is very good? Sort of depends on what you mean by 'different situations'? Look, I'm not just being difficult.  Sensible, relevant suggestions depend upon understanding what ...

Sort of depends upon where you are walking around . . .