Thomas Richter

This DOF scale on the 55 mk2 does not look real. If you look at the f4 mark, it seems to cover the range from infinity down to roughly 1.5m. That can't be true. Do the Chinese think those marks are...

I think what is more needed is a decent and fast 18mm for APS-C...love that 28mm equiv FOV.

Did they fix the overheating? - I prefer you just tell me the answer. A simple yes or no will suffice ;-)

Two things: I find it hard to believe that it took Fuji so many years to find out that people want larger grips. So it was intentional crippling. Now they are under pressure and release that...

From a price perspective, the Z5 should be compared to the RP. Over in the Nikon forums they rumors it has the old sensor from the D750. As far as low ISO DR goes, I much prefer that one over the ...

All understood, and true. Medium format territory, nonetheless :-)

Currently the Fuji GFX 50R sells for 3410 EUR here. Sure not latest model but just to show the order of magnitude prices have reached. The EOS R5 is 4385 EUR ($5017), body only, where I live. Ok, I ...

Nope. Canon user here; started the thread. Canon user for 26 years who is just a little concerned now that R5 price fell well into medium format territory and even R6 is out of reach for normal ...

If the Z5 has to rumored sensor (from the D750), then it ticks all the boxes Canon had us wait for the last 10 years: IBIS, dual card, good DR. All at the price point of an RP.

I agree, seriously, but prices are moving in the right direction now :-)

Ticking all the boxes for a prosumer stills photographer: (1) Full frame mirrorless (2) IBIS (3) Dual card slots (4) 3.69 dots OLED EVF (5) Tilting ...

It really depends on the use case. For wildlife and BiF I agree the new system has unique features. But for landscape, portrait or studio, even for travel you pay a lot of money for features you ...

If you ever looked at 1080p from a professional broadcast quality video camera you have to realize how little of that format's potential is used by any consumer camera. Way to go before it makes ...

Just wondering why Canon does not make an 85mm f1.4 like other vendors. Guess their strategy is to widen the gap between pro and consumer lenses, so you really got to paid $3k to get anything decent.

Sensor development and manufacturing is very expensive. Canon would have to sell loads of cameras to recover the cost.

Big, ugly, slower than the thirty year old ef 85/1.8. Let‘s hope for optical qualities then...

I hope it's not like the smartphones where images are uploaded silently in the background without your explicit consent....

I think it was here at DPR in the review of the 1dx3 where they hinted at possible RAW NR going in in the shadows. Maybe something similar happens also in the R5?

Seriously?