Thomas Richter

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 8, 2007

Comments

Total: 19, showing: 1 – 19

1700€ for a crop camera body and still not a single decent standard zoom available for it. Thank you very much.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 07:31 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1599 comments in total)
In reply to:

crashpc: I was about to buy this little beast, but 1150€? Come on! That's a joke.

Exactly! I am still enjoying my NEX-3N which I picked up for 299€ including kit lens. And that lens is not f6.3 and has a metal mount...

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 09:19 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1599 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rouseabout: I was hoping a prime or two would have been announced also

I even own a Sony mirrorless. The native lens series for M is no better, but at least DPAF focuses well in low light (at least I assume so, for the M5 we will have to wait and see).

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 06:28 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1599 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rouseabout: I was hoping a prime or two would have been announced also

Sure I did:
> accurate AF
rules out most PDAF below 5Dmk3 level
> decent/affordable lenses.
rules out all Sony mirrorless.
> AF should work in low light.
rules out Sony mirrorless mostly (except maybe A7R2)
> No broken sensors please,
rules out Fuji
> not smaller than APS-C?
rules out all m4/3

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 18:05 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1599 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rouseabout: I was hoping a prime or two would have been announced also

Just saying that any system, even with adapters, that fulfills the mentioned requirements, is a step forward. Sure we would all like to have all thinkable lenses in native format, perfect IQ, and low cost on any mount, but that is just not going to happen.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 17:10 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1599 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rouseabout: I was hoping a prime or two would have been announced also

Not necessarily. I am looking for accurate AF and decent/affordable lenses. AF should work in low light. So where else do I get this? (Not considering $4k bodies with super PDAF). No broken sensors please, not smaller than APS-C?

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 16:35 UTC

The range of adjustment is smaller than the focus shift of the EF24-70 f4L.
LOL

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2016 at 07:26 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
On article The mighty PEN: Hands-on with Olympus PEN-F (152 comments in total)

Nice. But why a dedicated color/art dial and still no dedicated ISO dial? (Same applies to almost all cameras in the market; I just don't get it. Even PASM is less important to me. I mean; for that retro type of feeling I want focus on the essentials: shutter, aperture, ISO; visible, with imprinted numbers on the dials, not necessarily re-configurable; always at the same place; is it so hard?)
Also, pricing it twice as much as the X-E2s might be a bit steep.

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11 UTC as 38th comment | 4 replies
On article In Fine Detail: Canon EOS 5DS / 5DS R In-Depth Review (742 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thomas Richter: @DPR: it would be good if you could describe what type of PP was applied to the "real world DR comparison" city shots. It only says "ETTR" right now, but I assume some brightening must have been done too; else the 5DSR would not show so much noise at ISO 100, isn't it?

Thanks for the quick help. Not everyone can examine RAW files on every computer/tablet etc. ;)

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55 UTC
On article In Fine Detail: Canon EOS 5DS / 5DS R In-Depth Review (742 comments in total)

@DPR: it would be good if you could describe what type of PP was applied to the "real world DR comparison" city shots. It only says "ETTR" right now, but I assume some brightening must have been done too; else the 5DSR would not show so much noise at ISO 100, isn't it?

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 09:43 UTC as 141st comment | 6 replies
On article Sony reportedly shifting focus to full-frame cameras (447 comments in total)

Problem is, Sony does not have a single decent standard zoom for any of their mirrorless systems.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 06:38 UTC as 50th comment | 18 replies
On article Just Posted: Hands-on Canon EOS 6D preview (589 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Todd: "To distinguish it from the more expensive 5D Mark III, the 6D features a simpler, 11-point AF system with a single cross-type focus sensor." Rubbish. Back to only focusing with the center AF point? I always said the 40D/50D had better AF than the 5D 2, now the 6D has joined the substandard AF club.

Focus & recompose doesn't even work for shooting the kids; let alone sports and action. I usually need to trigger the shot in less than one second.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 12:20 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

smallcams: In case the review didn't mention it, the battery life is pretty darn amazing.

Yea, about half of what the 2006 Fuji F30 did.

LOL

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 14:52 UTC
On photo DSC01502 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Again no mid-ISO shots of low contrast subjects. It's a pity.
ISO 400 is completely missing in the samples.
Most shots are either base ISO or in the 800-1600.
Then the high ISO shots are often w/o detail or the detail is not in focus.
That way it's hard to draw any conclusions about the ISO range that COULD actually be used beyond ISO125.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 07:44 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 Review Samples sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Again no mid-ISO shots of low contrast subjects. It's a pity.
ISO 400 is completely missing in the samples.
Most shots are either base ISO or in the 800-1600.
Then the high ISO shots are often w/o detail or the detail is not in focus.
That way it's hard to draw any conclusions about the ISO range that COULD actually be used beyond ISO125.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 07:44 UTC as 1st comment
On article Canon issues product advisory for PowerShot S100 (48 comments in total)

Tape - again?

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2012 at 06:53 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III low-light ISO series samples (319 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZAnton: Using low light conditions DPReview has certainly improved the ISO tests, although there are no similar shots for other cameras for comparison (except for G1X).
Second problem is, that all objects there (except the rat) are big (compared to the pixel size) and of the even color or moderately changing color.
Such conditions is excellent for the NR, but they rarely seen in the real life, (unless you are making a macro of a pencil in the dark toilet. :-))

The real troubles come on the small objects (hairs, leaves if they are far away enough) etc.
So guys, put the rat in the focus please. It looks like "rat quality" degrades very fast even here.

Completely agree that the setup is not good for showing ISO performance. No in focus low contrast detail, so NR can go in and smooth away all the noise and images look fine, except for appearing somewhat less 3-dimensional due to reduced color differentiation. But human eye is very forgiving w.r.t color.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2012 at 15:42 UTC

Small sensor size is possibly because Nikon (and likely also Canon) want to protect their DSLR sales. Their reckoning is probably that many potential buyers of such cameras don't put the highest focus on sensor size (upgraders from compacts may not have all the knowledge about IQ that is around in the forums here.)

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2011 at 07:41 UTC as 361st comment
On article Just Posted: Sony NEX-7 pre-production samples gallery (105 comments in total)

I would like to see more "mid ISO" shots in all the sample galleries. ISOs between 400 and 1250 of low contrast scenes with fine details. Thus far most of the shots in most galleries are either ISO 100/200, or high ISO (1600+) with scenes that do not have much detail. Thus the interesting part is masked out. The ISO100 is always great and of ISO1600+ nobody expects exceptional detail and color differentiation. I'm looking for really clean ISO 800 in a crop camera and I suspect that's still not available (depending on personal expectations of clean-ness, of course).

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 07:01 UTC as 12th comment
Total: 19, showing: 1 – 19