-
clorox is not good as microfiber. its course surface is abrasive. since it was applied only to hood and barrel surface, the damage is minimal. better than methyl alcohol, which is a risk to paint ...
-
$12,495. for 0.95 shallow depth of field and perfection in smooth bokeh. the hood per se is more expensive then gold.. it reflects more to a life style. if you have both an ef 50 1.2 and this 10k ...
-
agree. i don't worry lack of funding for that project. i bet the lens still going to produce as stunning pictures with or w/o lint.
-
if human eye cannot discern the impact of white lint on the image, then there's no impact.
-
I can live the lints on inside velvet. The reason i want to remove lint is i want to keep it in its original condition. btw the price is monumently stup*d. i don't consider buying a new one even ...
-
tried both 3M scotch magic tape and a packing tape. magic tape is too weak to make a difference. packing tape removed ~75%. I don't know if it'll leave any adhesive residue, but only packing tape ...
-
Thanks for the creative. the sharpie should dye those lints perfectly black.. i think those white smear should be lint/dirt rubbed off of the wipes, captured by the fluffy "black velvet". i don't ...
-
I cleaned this lens Hood today using Clorox and Kimwipes. then i noticed the cleaning left a band of while smear on the "black velvet" stuff on the inside of hood front end: it is noticeable. How ...
-
should be very useful. Thanks.
-
Good advice. Thanks a lot.
-
this lens is idle most of time for now. I put it in its original trunk case, shown here canon 300B trunk case an alternate option that seems more portable and ready for occasional shots is a padded ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
36 |
Threads started |
6 |
Last post |
2 months ago |
|