William Koehler

William Koehler

Lives in United States Alpharetta USA, United States
Works as a Software
Joined on Dec 12, 2005
About me:

Panasonic DMC-GH4
Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 lens
Pentax K-01
Pentax K-x
Pentax *ist-DL
Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 lens for K-mount
Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 lens for K-mount
Pentax FA 35mm f2.0
Pentax DA 18-55mm f3.5-5.6
Pentax DA 55-300mm f4-5.6
Pentax ZX-5n (35mm film)
Pentax K1000 (35mm film)
Canon HF-G20
Canon HF-S200
Sony HDR-HC9
Sony DCR-TRV320
Adobe Lightroom 6.0
Adobe Photoshop CS5.5
Sony Vegas Pro 13

Comments

Total: 139, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Fabian60: and absolutely golden chain..... ;)

For your viewing agony... ;-)

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/8641626030/price-released-for-brikk-s-24k-gold-nikon-df

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2016 at 19:36 UTC
In reply to:

dpfan32: And again: way more expensive than the predecessor...
And what replaces the FZ1000 in its price range???
It's like buying an iPhone for 800€ and next year they charging 1200€ for their improved model...
It's ridiculous...
Camera maker don't want to produce affordable cameras anymore.
Their target market seems to be only enthusiasts who are willing to pay more than 1000€ for a camera. Let the others shoot with their phones...

"Camera maker don't want to produce affordable cameras anymore."

I would be quite willing to bet that the "affordable camera" crowd is happy with the camera in their phone. I don't think it is a big secret that camera sales volumes for dedicated cameras are falling, which has the reciprocal effect of pushing prices up.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 17:14 UTC
In reply to:

Satyaa: Question for FZ1000 owners:
I used FZ1000 briefly. I am planning to get one for travel. My video usage will be limited/infrequent. I have no speculation if that will increase in future or if I will have video opportunities/needs during travel.

I use Nikon D7200 as my main camera for hobby and unpaid work, the only limitation being which lenses I can carry in any given situation.

From your experience with FZ1000 and what you see in this new model, which one would you buy if you were in my situation?

Thanks.

Name a bridge camera that has a battery grip. I don't believe any of them do. That's pretty exclusively a DSLR class and up feature.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 16:58 UTC
In reply to:

thubten: Why does an adapter cost as much as a lens?

In no particular order:
1. The development costs are fixed.
2. The sales volume are low. This is a pro only item. People with low-end lenses costing less than this adapter are unlikely to buy this at any price. They'll buy more low-end lenses instead.
3. The competition is limited to non-existent.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 16:34 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: Nice kit zooms

Nice kit, period.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2016 at 16:28 UTC
In reply to:

raindance: The space savings on the Sony A7 is reduced once you factor in the lenses which are every bit as big as other FF lenses (and in some cases bigger than Nikon/Canon offerings).

The space savings of the Sony A7 series bodies are still further reduced when you factor in all the underwater housings for all the gear. There's obviously a lot more than the camera body and lens.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 14:44 UTC
In reply to:

newe: Where are the interchangeable lenses or 25X zoom?

http://www.sony.com/electronics/interchangeable-lens-cameras/ilce-qx1-body-kit

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2016 at 01:34 UTC
In reply to:

GinoSVK: HUAWEI Make It Possible... with right equipment.

Huawei shot with a Canon and got fired for their trouble.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 02:22 UTC
On article Samsung launches first removable UFS memory cards (177 comments in total)

Just as SD/SDHC/SDXC has achieved market dominance, someone has to come up with yet another flash card format. Good luck with that, Samsung. Maybe you should ask Sony how well MemoryStick worked for them, seeing as Sony has made almost everything they sell work with SD/SDHC/SDXC.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 01:39 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

PropaPH: I'm a media professional and spend all day looking at images on a computer, in a company of more than 500 similar workers. The overwhelming trend in software interfaces in the last few years has been towards neutral-to-dark backgrounds to help reduce eye strain for people who work long hours constantly staring at a monitor. Sites that use large areas of white background are visually uncomfortable and seem amateurish to me for that reason.

One reason black backgrounds cause less eyestrain is because it greatly reduces the effect of monitor flicker. I went through a period of eye problems years ago where this was a huge issue for me. I was so happy when I found the Sun workstations I was working with at the time had an invert function for the display.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 19:03 UTC

I now know I'm in the minority, but thank you so much DPR for keeping the light text on dark background. This is my first time visiting the site with the new default white background and it took only seconds to get back to 'normal' (whatever that is).

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 18:57 UTC as 189th comment
In reply to:

phoenix15: Only if Lenovo let the motorola brand alive. Only moto is not enough.

More specifically, Google bought Motorola Mobile Devices, stripped out MMD's patent portfolio for enhanced ammo in the Microsoft/Google/Linux patent wars, and sold the remainder to Lenovo.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2016 at 16:54 UTC
In reply to:

PKDanny: DISLIKE Motorola!!!

I like them. I have a first gen Moto G and they have been very good at pushing out the Android updates/upgrades.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2016 at 15:55 UTC
In reply to:

GotoDengo: DPR, shouldn't you add a "NOTE:" to this story indicating the results appear to be hampered by a sub-par lens, and a substitute is on the way?

Your comments make that clear. It needs to be in the story.

@Thematic

No. According to the Zeiss USA website, Otus is only available in Nikon F and Canon EF mount.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2016 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: Smart idea of Ricoh using the older 36mp Sony sensor to keep the cost well under $2K. Too bad Pentax did not have 4K video mode with H.265 like the Samsung NX1 to increase sales but it looks like most Pentax users are not interested .

Going with an older sensor and getting 4K video is simply not going to happen.

I did note Pentax got the video data rate almost up to the AVCHD max. spec. and the audio sample rate up to 48 KHz, both big improvements.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2016 at 23:23 UTC
In reply to:

DoubleDash: Kodak and Polaroid. Very true. IPhone one #1, ridonculous.

The fact that a computer is not on #1 is just shamefull.

@Roland Karlsson
Yes, there were computers before the transistor, but none of those would fit in a house, much less under or on your desk.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2016 at 20:36 UTC
In reply to:

DoubleDash: Kodak and Polaroid. Very true. IPhone one #1, ridonculous.

The fact that a computer is not on #1 is just shamefull.

@Roland Karlsson
Yes, there were computers before the transistor, but none of those would fit in a house, much less under or on your desk.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2016 at 20:32 UTC
In reply to:

Robert Zanatta: Pretty good battery life.

Is like to try the viewfinder.

But only USB 2.0?

I noticed that also.

I am going to assume that on the smaller APS-C bodies space is at a real premium - and the USB 2.0 connector is undeniably smaller.

For fastest import of media, I would remove the card from the camera and stick it into a USB 3.0 card reader anyhow. Purpose built hardware has a way of being faster than what is built into most cameras.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 01:13 UTC
In reply to:

pgb: I'm sure the film will have a different look to video that some will find
very appealing but shoot for two hours and you could have bought this -

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/au/products/blackmagicursamini

You just nailed why this Kodak product is such an epic fail.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 20:54 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: And now... the elephant in the room.

$75 for 2.5 minutes of low fidelity video. Making it into "high priced motion lomography."

Is this a serious tool, or just another toy for hipsters?

It's a serious tool for removing money from hipsters.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 20:41 UTC
Total: 139, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »