Lord Powershoter

1DX is an irrelevant niche product that has nothing to do with this discussion. Might as well complain that $200,000 broadcasting cameras have a smaller sensor than a $400 DSLR. The R6 is a ...

Yes, why print photos? They feel so cozy and at home at the hard-drive, never to be looked at again ;)

If you ever have been to a large format photo exhibition, you would have seen that people love to explore the fine detail of large prints (the "viewing distance" argument is irrelevant then). And ...

Imo this "viewing distance argument" is flawed. Yes, it is true in principle that you basically only need 12mp (or less) if  the viewing distance is large. But have you ever been to a large format ...

But don't dare mention that the 20MP of the R6 are insufficient in 2020, since apparently 20MP are perfect since time immemorial and until the heat death of the universe.

Plus with Sony you get that sweet Tamron glass. 17-28/2.8 plus 28-75/2.8 for the price a 24-70/2.8 costs alone at Canikon.

Don't worry, in a short few years the Pixel will crush FF RAWs ez. Took them just 3 to get to APS-C level ;)

Guess you are doing it wrong. My Pixel 4 RAWs easily can keep up with my old d3400.

Pixel has computational RAW, that's getting better at every iteration. Editing latitude is roughly at APS-C levels right now.

I concur. I mean if we look at the basics of photography: You have a scene, that you want to capture, then a 5DIII can of course do it just as well as a new R6. There is really no compelling reason...

How is it "silly"? Of course, it's relevant, why do you think the R5 has that much more mp? Yes, you need to take care what you compare exactly. A Pixel 4 will beat a 24mp APS-C camera with a bad...

Since you are on Dpreview, I don't think you are the "Rebel crowd". I would define them as people who want an "upgrade from their smartphone" but don't really have any clue (yet) about how an ILC...

Read "one of the main reasons".

Also: how much mp is enough for you, pray tell? 5? 8? How many will be enough for you in 20 years? Why does Canon even offer more than 20mp?

True, actually... who needs more than 4mp, my bad.

The Canonaissance is upon us.

I don't know, I think the rebel-crowd is pretty much dead by now and sticking to smartphones. There might still be a few of them out there, but they would need a price of around 500 bucks.

Imo 20mp are really meager. One of the main reasons to still buy a dedicated camera in the first place, is image quality and resolution. 20mp will get you barely more detail than a top-tier...

They are "complacent", because they have no other choice. They don't have the resources to compete. There is only Sony that is somewhat big enough to even have a phone business but even there you...

The only people who give somewhat interesting interviews, are those who actually own the company, like the Sigma CEO/owner Kazuto Yamaki or Andreas Kaufmann (Leica).

"Why would they switch?" How many people are still using Minolta cameras? They will switch, because technology will advance and become too enticing.