Timmi

Well to my knowledge  Leica and Panasonic worked together on the SL technology wise, e.g CDAF and Video. So I would basically expect that at least all Leica lenses are DFD. B

easiy. ok I just have the M9P and 50mLux.... but this combo rocks already

Well besides having a Leica M9P I might exchange my Gh5 with the Upcoming FF Panasonic if it’s like rumoured... but I might also been tempted by the SL 2 or  Canikon if they sort out the video bit ...

I also think it looks great. nikon has to compete with Sony and to a degree the SL with Mark II expected soon. Also the GH5 / G9 is an important competitor. therfore the thing I think make or break ...

Well if you go for the F1.2  well than it’s definitely in the same class. Excellent long stuff is just very expensive. You could argue where is the long stuff reasonably priced, even at f4 or 5.6. ...

Yeah what a great combo. Panasonic or Olympus, please just release a m4/3 Version of  the 90-250mmF2.8 with OIS and the EC1.4 and 2.0 Just do and take my money

Well, it could be very well. Depending if these are getting their act together withe the EM1 MKIII. But I think the writing on the wall is with the G9. Thats what they have to be wary off. An ...

Well, and just a a more general update to my other reply: As I wrote I’ve been a long time 4/3 User and know all the great HG and SHG stuff. Now for m4/3, Olympus has a great lineup consisting of ...

Well it’s up to you what you need but I’m one of those classic 4/3 users since the E1. That’s why I learned to love HG and SHG leneses... and fast zooms and long end stuff. I have the 300mm F4  but ...

The issue with SHG (TopPro) they only really work accordingly with the EM1 MKII. Not so for the GH5...... And a m4/3 would be smaller albeit software corrected, which I would swallow. I went for ...

Can’t wait! I know all the great 4/3 lenses and this one with the small and big tuna were the stunning ones. I’m currently using the GH5 with the 300mm F4 but would switch immediately to a 90-250 ...

Well it does just read the comments on the YouTube Video. the Leica 12-60 was specifically named. Actually you’re comment was the only one not confirming the results. its also now discussed at eoshd.