dprived prev

hi everybody ... interpolation of a single (or multiple) shot(s) image, or "press (Offset) printing" rotation of the CMYK layers (so the 'pixels' don't overlap) etc, are all related and the very...

continued from above:

anyhoot, film fog AND grain can be eliminated almost totally, when film negative is regenerated via cine positive film and/or digital processing ... digital noise can be...

@ Ebrahim Saadawi: you're just stuck with film grain, while forgetting all about film fog? ever heard of that one, film "fog" by any chance? it's the equivalent of digital noise, which 99.99% of...

a rather late reply to an old post here but well, sounds like i'm the only one doing it anyway! :-)

i guess that's what you'd find all digital cameras do when in an exposure setting that takes...

btw, moire is mostly to do with displays than sensors ... if displays improve too (not only in pixel count and pitch, but also in core technology!) then moire will be reduced just as well ... as...

@ Ebrahim Saadawi: you're not outright wrong but you're not quite right either my friend ...

yes, they're used more to film but it doesn't mean they don't understand digital, or don't use it at...

continued from above:

shoot with film material, then ages later, re-scan the same negative (if well kept that is) using higher resolution digital technology, and you'd get even better results ......

@ Dester Wallaboo: yes, i can: most high quality cine negative material did yield up to 10 stops DR (Exposure Latitude) decades ago ...

and that was achievable with lousy commercial processing ......

* best results for this kind of trick back in the day, as early as 1960s and 1970s, and possibly well into the 1980s and later just as well, was via scanning a finely exposed and processed...

No @Roland Karlsson - this IS the hardware version of the same old software trick. agreed though, it's needed, but not 100% really! :-)
_ _ _

theoretically, AND practically, something similar is...

"... was told not to stand in front of Homme during a show back in 2014 because, and here she quotes directly, "[you] will get a boot in the face.""

really? and everyone knows about this? then...

yeah! weather-sealed Pentax rider here too ...
but still ... ;-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo61t5fH6Qw

surely weather-sealed or whatever the term used by any camera manufacturer DOES NOT mean it's totally dust / water proof ...

it just helps protect the gear against a sudden wind hurling debris...

if this works as promised, i'd have at least 2 of it in my backpack as i always carry at least two DSLRs ... what about heavy lenses though? not even all sturdy tripods are a good fit for those...

@ Dester Wallaboo: your comment shows perfectly well you don't know what "film" is then!

chances of more 'dead' emulsions and large format film sheets returning are much higher now than digital...

yes, it's new but i still stand corrected: this is the hardware version of the same old software trick ... probably works slightly better in results too, as can be seen via practical tests in both...

and one of the worst gimmicks Pentax has made ever!

very well put! Adobe could also work more on more advance, WAY more advanced scripting techniques to let PS users for example, have much better control over the automation of certain daily routine...

been there done that, although not at such a high level ...
no matter how mature they may look on the surface, some employers / managers / supervisors have a mentality of a 5 year old little child ...

8K and above has more applications than just larger home tv screens ... think of much larger huge theater screens for example ... or scanning etc ... there is no end to this really!