milkod2001

It'll be miles away for sharpness but still very decent. Besides 135mm GM is one of the sharpest lens ever made.

IS there a portrait mode available and stabilisation be working fine? Any info regarding this?

@jonby
The fact its NON flagship camera at $6000!!!

Price wise it's super close to be flagship camera. Can't think what Canon might bring into R1 to make it even better. Again great camera but yeah still feels super pricey. Even Sony did not charge...

Canon should have called R3 R1 and sell it as flagship camera at $6500. R3 at $6000 feels like huge rip off. Great camera but super pricey. Could only be justified if it was meant as flagship...

Used to have Samyang 135 f2 MF lens on Nikon D750. great lens, super sharp from f2. They say it's on pair with Zeiss 135 f2 lens. The only issue was manual focusing on 135mm lens. It's was a pain...

Some might find those lenses usable. I'd prefer Sigma to work on 50 1.2 Art and where the heck is 70-200 2.8 Sport at?

Agreed. They always should do that to give viewers better perspective what they be getting and could be missing...

Looks like Sony did not develop new MF sensor for Fuji so they had to use anything they had in disposal. Nice camera. If going for MF i'd probably went to GFX 100S with 100MP to make it stand out...

'Only' :) $5500 to undercut Sony A1. Im getting 2.

It is probably there to remind us where we got in photography and art overall these days: faeces...

Sony alpha mount cameras are already used as door stoppers. Things are changing quickly...