Colin Stuart

Has a website at
Joined on Jul 19, 2009


Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

EskeRahn: Oh we have seen how similar techniques have maimed old black and white movies...

this hasn't been used on old movies... that was all done with manual colorization by people..........

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2017 at 14:19 UTC
In reply to:

Bob 1: It might be fun to try again... lets see, new batteries, where did I store that slide projector... do I even still have it? Where can I get it developed... $40 bucks +#$T!! Congrats to those who still shoot analog :) Here is something you might enjoy watching:
HAGD, Bob :)

Bob, 800 is a... LOT of pictures. Even for digital. How many of them are actually keepers? If film has taught me anything it's restraint.... don't take a million pictures of the same or similar thing. Has helped me too in my digital workflow, less pictures to throw out, even if it doesn't save money it saves time.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 18:56 UTC
In reply to:

Bob 1: It might be fun to try again... lets see, new batteries, where did I store that slide projector... do I even still have it? Where can I get it developed... $40 bucks +#$T!! Congrats to those who still shoot analog :) Here is something you might enjoy watching:
HAGD, Bob :)

projector? just scan it back in :)

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 21:31 UTC
In reply to:

Colin Stuart: disgracing the Ektar name with this POS...

oh! whew

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2016 at 18:45 UTC

disgracing the Ektar name with this POS...

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2016 at 18:19 UTC as 53rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Class A: A "disappointment" is the result of expectations not being met. What were your expectations?

That the camera is somehow innovative? You don't know in what way, but it needs to be innovative somehow?

You write that Canon has not been innovative for 10 years now, but you are still living through a "big disappointment" because they have failed to be innovative (showing "reinvention") again? Were 10 years not enough to adjust your expectations?

You speak of a "big disappointment" but you just go on and on how great the camera is. Your only point seems to be that you would have liked to have seen the camera two years earlier.

So Canon should not have released this camera because it is "too late anyhow"?

I have to ask: Has DPReview now descended to the level of using click-bait article headlines? I have never seen such an example of the opposite of a "Damning with faint praise". What is this? A "Praise with faint damning"?

exactly. a whole lot of whining and nothing substantial said.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2016 at 18:14 UTC
On article Canon announces the XC15 4K video camera (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

bluevaping: Mark IV killer

This only has a 1" sensor... what are you talking about??

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2016 at 23:31 UTC
On article Art Wolfe: In search of Emperor Penguins in Antarctica (30 comments in total)

clicking on pictures, nothing seems to load?

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2015 at 13:16 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
On article Adobe celebrates 25 years of Photoshop (366 comments in total)
In reply to:

wootpile: It's a great piece of software - but I refuse to pay a cloud fee for it. over a 10 year - span - PS CC will cost you $1200. hope they go broke.

Over a 10yr span, that's nothing. PS was $300-600+ before. If they upgraded it every year or every couple/few years, you'd see a savings with sticking with CC. Even with the upgrade price which is cheaper, or skipping a version. CC overall is much better.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 07:07 UTC
In reply to:

Lassoni: Damn! Tokina lenses always look good. I hope this 24-70 will be better than Tamron, even if it doesn't have IS. Would be nice to see this company up in the game!

And the price of 11-20 is practically steal when you compare it to the other brands offering. Sure it's not cheap, but it ain't bad.

I miss my 11-16 :(

they don't only look good, they feel great. work well too.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2015 at 03:12 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: They stole their logo from Infinity

wow you're right

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2015 at 21:20 UTC
In reply to:

JT986: Between the new and older 300mmf4.
I love that the new one is much lighter and smaller.
the big question for me is.
Will their BOKEH be any different?
New one better BOKEH?

You're thinking of mirror-based lenses... this is definitely not that.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 13:42 UTC
On article Drobo launches Mini with 8TB pre-loaded (40 comments in total)
In reply to:

Damien Demolder: Drobo isn't getting great comments here! Has anyone else had issues with their products? Who makes the best storage systems?

Synology makes the best.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 12:20 UTC
On article Inside RA001: World's first Boeing 747 'Jumbo Jet' (127 comments in total)

view of the cockpit reminds me of the scene from Airplane!

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2014 at 13:46 UTC as 55th comment
In reply to:

blue hour: - no touchscreen
- no Wifi
- can't record 4K video
- more expensive than the competition (Pentax K3, Sony A77 Mk II,Olympus E-M1)
- all of those competitors feature stabilization built into the body, that works with every lens you attach
- rumours of a hybrid viewfinder (like the Fuji X100 T) didn't make it to the production line- Canon should reinforce their innovation management

in body stabilization looks like CRAP in videos compared in in-lens stabilization. Why need a glitchy touch screen? Buttons work 100% of the time and are easy to use, and can be used with gloves on etc. Who needs 4K? What is going to display all that resolution? Just because a camera with a smaller sensor can do it, doesn't mean it will look any good or better (it will NOT). Wifi would be nice, but at least there are grips etc that allow that functionality.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 01:59 UTC
In reply to:

kadardr: They have to make damned sure that this is at least as good as the Sigma 1.4/50 Art lens. Otherwise there is no point.

Can't the bokeh on the new Sigma be quite busy in ways? There are better 50/1.4s & similar.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 12:13 UTC
In reply to:

Edac2: Why can't a 60 x 60mm sensor be made? 43.8 x 32.9mm is nowhere near "full frame" and there will be a significant loss of focal length using this back (43.8 is 73% of 60, and 32.9 is only 55% of 60). Perhaps having the sensor plane further from the lens than a film plane compensates for this; then you would just lose some of the square image at the top and bottom of the frame. There would be other compromises, though, such as not being able to use the camera's viewfinder. Would one keep the mirror flipped up to use this back?

the perspective stays the same, what you see is cropped though (angle of view is less)

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2014 at 13:47 UTC
On article Apple is on camera-engineer hiring spree (87 comments in total)

I love how that picture shows an iphone sitting atop an IBM Model M Keyboard! *types on one right now and loves it*

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2014 at 12:16 UTC as 25th comment
On article A look inside Sigma's lens factory (89 comments in total)
In reply to:

rtogog: Surprise me, the role of human being are very dominant on the production line of the process of making of lens.

we wonder why it's expensive. Just a bunch of ground elements slapped together... much more then just that!

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2014 at 14:04 UTC
Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »