Works as a Geologist
Joined on Jan 3, 2010


Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Considering the implications, the message at the end of the video is rather limp to say the least.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 20:15 UTC as 66th comment
On article Nikon D850 Review (2114 comments in total)
In reply to:

PentUp: Sooo... basically now the entire DPR backdrop/background is a Nikon advert... influencing, much?

Why does it upset you that a brand other than the one you own, is reviewed positively? Seriously, what is it with this puerile brand loyalty of yours and so many others?

If Panasonic or Fujifilm or Canon or Pentax or whoever manage to produce a camera that tests better than the rest, isn't that a good thing? Doesn't it incrementally push the rest (including your favorite brand) to leapfrog them, and to produce something even better?

Grow up you silly children!

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 06:29 UTC
In reply to:

OhWeh: There is only one word to describe Mr. Tetsuros statement: arrogant.

Why? I don't think he said that full-frame is the only option for mirrorless. He just said that for Nikon, full-frame is the right way to go

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2017 at 17:01 UTC
In reply to:

vFunct: Companies should drop all mirrorless camera development, since mirrorless cameras are not useful. Real photographers only use dSLRs. Mirrorless cameras are for people that don't know how to take a good photo. The only thing these people do is type on message boards.

Remember, there is nothing a mirrorless can do that a dSLR can't do better.

Smile and wave folks. Just smile and wave. vFunct is deFunct

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2017 at 16:57 UTC
In reply to:

Bambi24: incredible lack of detail and oversharpened halos everywhere

Bambi, I think you do make a fair point about the sharpness and over-processing of these particular photos, but would it make you happy if Canon was the only brand of camera on the market? I'm really intrigued by blind brand loyalty, whether it's for Canon, Nikon, Apple, BMW, or Gucci. It seems to me to be rather short sighted at best.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 11:40 UTC
In reply to:

Segaman: Who gives a damn apart from people that makes a living of talking about it.

So, Segaman, I take it you are a 6D II owner already. It's always hard to admit that you've bought a lemon.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 09:19 UTC
In reply to:

Vacilando Productions: conclusion, you'd have to be a sucker to buy a canon in 2017.

Nah, all this tells us is that you'd have to be an idiot to buy a 6D II. Canon still makes a whole bunch of excellent cameras and lenses, but this one just shows that Canon too can make a lemon.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 09:17 UTC
In reply to:

abi170845: Canon will kill off Sony Mirrorless and others in one clean swoop when Canon comes up with a mirrorless body that is compatible with all the EF lenses.

Yeh sure, they're definitely showing their technical superiority with the 6D II, aren't they.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 09:14 UTC

Or you could just buy a camera

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 07:22 UTC as 14th comment
On article CES 2017: Hands-on with the Kodak Super 8 (426 comments in total)

For pseudo-Hipsters only. Real Hipsters wouldn't be seen dead with a hybrid ;-)

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2017 at 15:13 UTC as 29th comment
On article Have your say: Best high-end compact of 2016 (102 comments in total)

I don't regard the Leica, the RX10 or the FZ2500 as compact, so they didn't get my vote

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2016 at 06:37 UTC as 16th comment

I can never understand the presence of these things in an otherwise useful photographic website.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2016 at 12:40 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On article DPReview Asks: What was your first camera? (766 comments in total)

When I was eight years old, I was given a Kodak Instamatic 25, which, unsurprisingly, I found to be utterly useless for wildlife photography. I also experimented with an old, even at the time, Zeiss Ikon, which had been passed down the generations (I think it was my great-grandfather's). I still have it, and it still works. My first "real" camera was a Nikon FE. Needless to say, such a fine piece of equipment turned me into a bit of a Nikonophile.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2016 at 10:03 UTC as 216th comment
In reply to:

Adam Sharp: Not as good as a Nikon 😜

Hmm, not so sure. If the MkIV doesn't outperform the D810 in just about every respect, with the possible exception of dynamic range, I'll be very surprised.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 11:16 UTC
In reply to:

m3: There is still hope:
At least a hundred and eighty some of the passengers told the lawyers to bugger off and weasel money from other 'causes' other than a mistake gone wrong.
The world is full of these blood-sucking parasites and one of the severe causes for its demise, together with bankers and speculators, all blessed by greedy politicians.

Actually, it's UK, not US.... this time

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 09:09 UTC
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (286 comments in total)

This is a waste of space on the DPR pages

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 10:17 UTC as 74th comment | 2 replies
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (807 comments in total)
In reply to:

StevenE: This thing is barely medium format. The sensor is only 22% wider than full frame.
For perspective, full frame is 62% wider than APS-C, and more than 100% as wider than MFT sensors.
Previous Hasselblads were 50% wider than full frame

But who cares whether the sensor size exactly matches some old film standard? Why should it? It is what the specs say it is, and I bet, in the right hands, it'll capture some really high quality images.

Well done Hasselblad, you've pulled yourselves out of the ditch that you threw yourselves into when you went down the path of buggering up some perfectly good Sonys.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 05:30 UTC
In reply to:

art99: Does the world need another aps size sensor ?
Cannot Foveon make a real FF sensor with exceptional low light performance ? Like a sd quattro FF.

@HowaboutRAW - You're absolutely right. I got myself all muddled. I was actually thinking of the A7 cameras.

They are expensive, but I wonder if these Sigmas (which compete in the same class) will be any cheaper.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 06:42 UTC
In reply to:

art99: Does the world need another aps size sensor ?
Cannot Foveon make a real FF sensor with exceptional low light performance ? Like a sd quattro FF.

@deep7 & @Najinsky, for me, it's not just about capturing light, but more so about depth of field control. Sigma make some superb FF (yes, I know that's an arbitrary size, but it's bigger than APS-H) lenses, and I reckon a FF mirrorles Foveon to go with them would have got a lot of people excited.

These cameras are going to have a tough time competing with the Sony RX offerings simply because of their smaller sensors.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2016 at 08:03 UTC

Good work Nikon! In the world of compacts there's no longer a space for anything other than premium quality. iPhones have taken over the "consumer" end of the market, and that's just fine.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 08:16 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »