RedFox88

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007

Comments

Total: 988, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boissez: I am liking this move towards smaller and lighter DSLRs. The fact that Canon could trim 40 % of the 80Ds weight, without losing any features shows just how bloated DSLRs have become.

Now please do the same with your lenses and full-frame lineup.

There's a reason why the phrase bigger is better stays true.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 11:37 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

fatdeeman: At least the liveview burst rate has been increased over the 80D which is handy considering these cameras now track better in liveview mode than they do through the ovf..

Shame that rear dial is so tiny though, it's nice that it has one at all I guess but even the 60d gad nice largish one.

No 80D is 5 fps live view

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 11:34 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: Wow ... I would be upset if I bought that 80d for Christmas right now.. Shame on you.. Glad I decided on the Fuji XT2..

You clearly don't realize what differences the 80D has and bigger ovf is a big point.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 04:49 UTC
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (668 comments in total)
In reply to:

Autriche78: Good for Canon, but can someone explain why every manufacturer seems to desire to confuse the consumer with model numbers that bear no obvious relation to hierarchy within a system? So this is below the 5 but above the 3 - and labelled as #6. Seriously...

Dude, Canon is Japanese not Chinese

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 04:46 UTC

OMG! 😷

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2017 at 17:06 UTC as 242nd comment
In reply to:

sh10453: Question to Canon or DPR staffs:
What is the difference (in optics) between this lens and the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III?
$550 as opposed to $200.
I know this one uses a USM motor (as opposed to the DC motor in the other one), and this one has the added IS.
Thanks.

You're unlikely to find DPR staff commenting on the quality difference between products not in a review. Keep waiting....

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2017 at 00:59 UTC
In reply to:

sh10453: Question to Canon or DPR staffs:
What is the difference (in optics) between this lens and the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III?
$550 as opposed to $200.
I know this one uses a USM motor (as opposed to the DC motor in the other one), and this one has the added IS.
Thanks.

The 75-300 usm III should be discontinued as it's essentially been replaced by the ef-s 55-250. The aforementioned 75-300 $200 lens is junk, so soft beyond 200mm.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2017 at 00:58 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Minolta's prosumer DiMAGE 7 (199 comments in total)
In reply to:

EwanMC: Impressive image quality for a prosumer camera ... until the Sony DSC-R1 came along a few years later.

sony: the "make anything once" company! LOL!

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 14:12 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Minolta's prosumer DiMAGE 7 (199 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: In year 2017, I can't imagine myself, directing this thing to peoples face to shoot (their photo)! It looks like a bomb or some kinda bull-pup design austrian rifle on steroids :)

And a 70-200 lens is smaller?!

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 14:11 UTC
On article Google AI adds detail to low-resolution images (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

n o b o d y: Just look at the above picture from a distance of a few meters and your brain will do the same.

A few meters ? 10 feet? You can't see that tiny photo from 10 feet. As viewed on my phone.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 02:13 UTC
On article Google AI adds detail to low-resolution images (150 comments in total)

Is this another PR trickery like adobe pulled a couple of years ago when they scrambled a photo with a filter then used their filter to "unscramble " it

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 02:10 UTC as 47th comment

G master sounds like rapper, LOL!

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 17:07 UTC as 70th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

RedFox88: Off topic! Get this junk off this website!

Yes it does

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 22:16 UTC

Off topic! Get this junk off this website!

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 21:22 UTC as 23rd comment | 12 replies

So the standard model size is 8 inches? Wow!😮

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2017 at 14:02 UTC as 13th comment

And no 4K??

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 11:42 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
On article iPhone 7 Plus survives 13 hours in icy Russian river (98 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: I dropped my iPhone 5 into sea water and it powered on afterwards just fine.
It was after several hours though that both the mobile phone and GPS module ceased to work and this couldn't be repaired. The humidity detector did NOT indicate water intrusion and Apple replaced my device out of courtesy.

Therefore, I'd like to know if that iPhone7+ continued to work ok after a few days.

Sea? Meaning salt water. This was in a river. Fresh water. Salt corrodes electronics quickly!

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 17:03 UTC
On article iPhone 7 Plus survives 13 hours in icy Russian river (98 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: I dropped my iPhone 5 into sea water and it powered on afterwards just fine.
It was after several hours though that both the mobile phone and GPS module ceased to work and this couldn't be repaired. The humidity detector did NOT indicate water intrusion and Apple replaced my device out of courtesy.

Therefore, I'd like to know if that iPhone7+ continued to work ok after a few days.

Sorry but the 5 isn't listed as having any water resistance.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 11:53 UTC
In reply to:

AshMills: Who is Trump's Official Photographer? I look forward to seeing the transition of style.

There won't be a trump photographer. He doesn't want a record of who he's meeting , where, and what's going on in his shady Russian deals.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 04:33 UTC
In reply to:

mick232: One thing is for sure - whoever the new president's photographer is, he better gets himself a strong orange filter quickly.

There won't be a trump photographer. He doesn't want a record of who he's meeting , where, and what's going on in his shady Russian deals.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 04:32 UTC
Total: 988, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »