RedFox88

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007

Comments

Total: 990, showing: 201 – 220
« First‹ Previous910111213Next ›Last »
On article Apple unveils iPhone 7 and dual-cam iPhone 7 Plus (905 comments in total)
In reply to:

photoaddict: I am definitely ordering iPhone 7 as the camera is significantly better than what's available in my iPhone 6, especially the selfie camera which is currently 1.2 MP... too low... 7 MP is just perfect.

What I noticed is that the skin tones are MUCH more like the skin tones on film - the skin looks less red and more smooth without harsh highlights. Did anyone noticed that in photo samples on apple website?

Looking forward to what reviews have found with iPhone 7.

Why do you need 7MP of your face?

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2016 at 00:33 UTC
On article Apple unveils iPhone 7 and dual-cam iPhone 7 Plus (905 comments in total)
In reply to:

zzzxtreme: I still find it funny people spend more than $400 for a phone. My $250 sony z1 compact still works great with its snapdragon 800

Good for you, Jimmy.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2016 at 00:31 UTC
In reply to:

TyphoonTW: Nice images. When I was 16 all I could afford was a 60$ Kodak point&shoot film camera, feelsbadman.

kids are allowed to spend waaaaaay too much money these days. Companies have turned kids into consumers which is not a good thing with college costing so much.

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2016 at 13:34 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)

who let the trolls out? Who, who..

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2016 at 01:39 UTC as 229th comment

meh. and how is lava "wildlife" ? It isn't.

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2016 at 01:31 UTC as 47th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

justmeMN: I'm disappointed that we don't have any wild red fox in the neighborhood. We have lots of yummy wild rabbits that they would enjoy. :-)

Here I am!

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2016 at 01:30 UTC

Polaroid is a licensed (paid for ) brand name now remember.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2016 at 20:57 UTC as 19th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

photophile: Didn't Lytro already do this ?

No. Their gimmick was taking multiple pics at different focus distances at the same time, hence why resolution was very low on their prototypes.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2016 at 14:11 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark IV added to studio scene comparison (363 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): It just keeps getting better and better with this new Canon 5D IV - holy smokes! Very solid performance with this 30MP sensor.

- the 85 1.8 is really holding up well
- all 4 of the cameras are crazy good at low ISO. If you get nose prints on your monitor trying pick out any difference, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE!
- turning up the ISO up though & things change (i only check RAW) - the D810 really starts to get really noisy (relative to the others) at 3200 and its much more noticeable at 6400 rubbing away detail
- the A7R II is totally outgunned by the Canon! At ISO 6400 there is still plenty of detail in the Sony (its 42MP remember) but its shifting colour - the grey-black background is going green (at least on my monitor) and there is more noise. Above that when you go to crazy ISOs like 25,600 the Sony, Nikon and less so the 5D 3 are all noticably noisier and the Sony is doing wierd things like the whites are starting to glow, yet are still razor sharp on the Canon.

Impressive!

5D4 being a stop cleaner than the sony sensor in the d810 and a7r2 at iso extremes.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2016 at 21:39 UTC
In reply to:

Zoron: Please make a comparison with Nikon D900.....ooo wait it's not even announced yet

d900 is decades away by their naming convention.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2016 at 00:07 UTC
In reply to:

rjaywallace: Video would not play on my Apple iPad Retina screen. Disappointing.

Your screen's marketing name isn't the issue.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 23:51 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mariano Pacifico: I used to have Canon ESOS 5d Mark II with 24-105mm. I take good pictures and video as I can see as friends droll over it. Friends and a son of a friend who is teenage vlogger asked me "what point-and-shoot do you have?"

From then on, I realized people cannot know the difference between full dslr and point-and-shoot quality. I dumped my back-breaking full dslr over Olympus Pen-F. Now, I can proudly say, I got teeny-tiny point-and-shoot camera without batting an eyelash at more than less half the price.

Epy: that is very telling of you.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 16:09 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: My 6D is retiring. Will wait a bit though for reviews to kick in, but I'm just about ready to grab this.

Except 6D has better sensor than the 5D3 and is better at very high iso.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 10:24 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)
In reply to:

pixtorial: Unfathomably expensive considering the breadth of highly capable cameras on the market today, regardless of the heritage of the 5D series.

...so says the m43 troll!

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 10:22 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Funkyd3121: So, the Canon G7XII gets a Digic 7 processor & the New 5DIV gets Digic 6+ - Huh??

Digic is just the name of their cpu. P&s cams can need more in camera processing applied than dslrs need, e.g. distortion correction and crop, noise reduction, etc since much bigger dslr sensor use better lenses, better focal lengths, and natively have less noise!

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 10:21 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Canon EOS 5D (230 comments in total)
In reply to:

WillWeaverRVA: The old 5D is still a great camera for portraits. If I had any Canon glass (or even just a fast 50), I'd probably get one. Its color rendition is amazing thanks to that CCD.

5D sensor was CMOS not CCD.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 00:52 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Canon EOS 5D (230 comments in total)

Thought it came out at $3300 not $3500. Then the 5D2 was $2700, then 5D3 $3500.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 00:36 UTC as 99th comment | 2 replies
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)
In reply to:

itsmeavi: The only good thing about this camera is that it will make 5d mark iii affordable :) Where's my third kidney...

5D3 sensor is old. This new one will be well worth the price over the 5D3 for more DR, dual pixel autofocus, more expansive af layout.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 19:09 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nindy: Where is Canons full frame for the enthusiast? The mk4 is priced for business's along with the x mk2.
The 6d is not an acceptable answer for 2016.

1D X2 is pro, 5D4 semi-pro/lightweight pro, 6D enthusiast. 6D2 next year.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 19:06 UTC

Tamron is exiting the macro lens market? Article makes no sense!

Link | Posted on Aug 20, 2016 at 12:51 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
Total: 990, showing: 201 – 220
« First‹ Previous910111213Next ›Last »