Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007


Total: 1466, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »


Link | Posted on May 17, 2018 at 09:16 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

lacikuss: What a misleading title. It even reads childish... So when a company reports losses the previous year and suddenly makes any profits, then it is how many times better than last year?


No it increased from 4 to 34 billion yen. But that's for all of nikon not just imaging. Imaging revenue dropped more than revenue for the entire company, meaning imaging is nikon's weakest division

Link | Posted on May 15, 2018 at 10:29 UTC

This will fall flat

Link | Posted on May 9, 2018 at 10:39 UTC as 7th comment

What's a flog?

Link | Posted on May 8, 2018 at 21:46 UTC as 37th comment | 3 replies

I was right. It's the iPhone X not 10

Link | Posted on May 8, 2018 at 15:39 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
On article Pentax K-1 II Review: A worthy upgrade? (1433 comments in total)
In reply to:

Max Iso: I admit, i skipped straight to the AF segment. And im still disgusted. How can Pentax make otherwise such great cameras and ignore this for so long? Pentax, fix C-AF and give us a full on auto ISO SS design and you will surely win a lot of customers.

I bet some Ricoh users would prefer only manual focus in the camera and no video or live view. Living in the past.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2018 at 22:04 UTC
In reply to:

matthew saville: I'm sure this will largely be used to sell pointless, over-priced "influencer merch", (ugh) ...but if photographers could use it to sell eBooks of their latest big adventure, or tutorial, or similar products, that'd be a great way to easily support artists, and I'd spend a bit for sure.

People viewing pics on a phone aren't interested in prints or paying to see more digital pics

Link | Posted on May 4, 2018 at 23:47 UTC
In reply to:

kociasek: Would you order prints of photos after seeing their tiny thumbnails on a smartphone?

You need a bigger phone if pics on it are tiny thumbnails

Link | Posted on May 4, 2018 at 23:45 UTC

Minimum 500 licenses for a school or 2500 for a district? Adobe is a money hungry biatch!

Link | Posted on May 4, 2018 at 07:49 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: What exactly do the Corephotonics patent claim?

I mean, you cannot patent having two cameras.

And you cannot (I hope) patent using two cameras and combine them to one virtual zoom lens. It is just too obvious.

There must be something more. Like some clever technique to do it.

So, what was the patent?

Just like Kodak patented sharing photos on a website, lol!

Link | Posted on May 2, 2018 at 00:40 UTC
In reply to:

dash2k8: The mirrorless train is gaining steam, with Canon and Nikon set to join Sony. I'm highly interested to see what's coming.

Canon has had good selling aps-c mirrorless for 5 years

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2018 at 22:20 UTC
In reply to:

mgm2: Every one marvels at the new technologies in mirrorless cameras and can't wait to see what is coming next. But do these mirrorless technologies actually improve image quality over and above what a DSLR can deliver?

No difference in IQ, just no mirror so no ovf

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2018 at 22:19 UTC
In reply to:

chrisno: once upon a time there was a product called Google glass
and it failed miserably

No, because it comes down to people don't want to wear glasses...who don't need to be wearing glasses! Google Glass was essentially safety glasses and snap chat glasses are goofy looking sunglasses

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2018 at 12:13 UTC
On article Why smartphone cameras are blowing our minds (447 comments in total)
In reply to:

mckracken88: Landscapes with a phone? Is that guy for real? Hahah. (or for that matter any subject where you want details and not a grainy smear)

Also a real photographer (and/or someone who cares enough) will despise fake computational effects and prefer reality.

Not when 99% of people viewing pics use their phone 🤔😲

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2018 at 17:07 UTC
On article Why smartphone cameras are blowing our minds (447 comments in total)
In reply to:

kayphoto: FYI: DP is own by Amazon, so yeah a great advertisement for the Pixel and Iphone. So please click on the ad links. :)

Dude, every website exists due to advertising and selling products. Grow up! Facebook is free because they sell your data and deliver advertisers to you!

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2018 at 17:03 UTC

Another fail

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2018 at 23:39 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply

Honestly, who knew casio still made p&s cams!

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2018 at 21:41 UTC as 52nd comment | 1 reply
On article Sony a7 III Review (2162 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pritzl: Just a quick question to DPR staff regarding this quote:

"In continuous autofocus, lenses focus at shooting aperture - so shooting moving objects while stopped down robs the AF system of light - could result in missed shots"

I've seen this with the X-T2 as well and, coming from DSLRs, it caught me by surprise. Is there a technical reason for this on mirrorless cameras? e.g. is it in order to maintain the WYSIWYG view?

Slrs could focus not wide open too, but don't for focusing speed and accuracy! Seems like sony wants to update the rules without understanding the reason for the rules!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 16:58 UTC

Design fail!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 16:53 UTC as 5th comment

So this is really touch up software not content aware. The objects appeared in the pictures do the software knew what was there. If they took a picture that had someone wearing dark sunglasses or a mask, their program would not work st all!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 10:19 UTC as 25th comment
Total: 1466, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »