Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007


Total: 890, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

AshMills: Who is Trump's Official Photographer? I look forward to seeing the transition of style.

There won't be a trump photographer. He doesn't want a record of who he's meeting , where, and what's going on in his shady Russian deals.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 04:33 UTC
In reply to:

mick232: One thing is for sure - whoever the new president's photographer is, he better gets himself a strong orange filter quickly.

There won't be a trump photographer. He doesn't want a record of who he's meeting , where, and what's going on in his shady Russian deals.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 04:32 UTC
In reply to:

CameraCarl: I sure hope Pete makes a book of his photos.

I doubt he has rights to use them.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 04:28 UTC
In reply to:

filmpoet: It's pretty sad and embarrassing how hostile these comments are. Can we just agree to disagree on whoever we voted for. We are still Americans and are suppose to be on the same team.

Tell that to congress. Ain't gonna happen there or here, dude!

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 04:26 UTC
In reply to:

Zoron: D900's competitor....Nikon bring it

d900 won't be out for decades. d820, then d830, etc

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 11:32 UTC

This is a video dslr not for consumers.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 17:15 UTC as 24th comment | 5 replies

Google+ is still around? LOL! Give up on social networking websites, google. And stop naming EVERYTHING you do with google at the start of the name. It'll make people tired of your brand!

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2017 at 03:55 UTC as 12th comment | 4 replies

Too bad their dslrs do video poorly still!

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 21:56 UTC as 118th comment | 1 reply

$2.2 billion? LOL!

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2017 at 23:31 UTC as 95th comment
In reply to:

tom43: Many thanks, Kodak! And guys, come on: Slide film has to be seen on a light table or by projection in all its beauty. By digitalization 90% of its character gets lost...

A Fuji Velvia on a light table is still unsurpassed by any digital file seen on a display. Most seem to have forgotten the colors and brilliance of slide film. Film is colorful, but misses the candy look seen too often today.

That's only because you think it's better because you're wanting it to be better!

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 23:19 UTC

I thought Kodak went bankrupt and was dissolved into a name to license? Who knew they still made things!

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 23:17 UTC as 100th comment | 1 reply

Just 20 MP? Yawn....

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 01:44 UTC as 8th comment
On article Nikon brings its D5600 DSLR to the US (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

pacnwhobbyist: I hope people are getting used to the idea that the ILC marker has matured to a point where the upgrades are going to be fairly minor from now on. Unless Canon has a surprise up its sleeve, you can expect the upcoming T7i and 77D to be a fairly iterative upgrade as well.

As far as this camera goes, Nikon didn't mess too much with what was an already excellent camera. I don't think anybody who purchases it will be disappointed with it.

But This isn't an interchangeable lens camera!

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 17:03 UTC

No problem with mine

Link | Posted on Dec 30, 2016 at 17:08 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Aroart: Really hope it comes true.. my 6+ still feels to big after 2 years and the smaller one usually lacks the same camera specs.. common Apple throw in a 1 inch Sony sensor in there and you'll blow away the competition...

Then your hands are too little like Trump's lil hands!

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2016 at 13:15 UTC
In reply to:

SimonSander: The page ist still called "Digital Photography Review" ... I think it's about time to change your name to Deep Photography Rumors, or Deep Sponsored Photography Reviews. For years I had been a loyal reader, but well, the recent months have proven you're going into a direction that makes me stop trusting the core parts (reviews and news) fo your page. Just one example: a "deep" review should have found out about the IS failure of the 80/85, and about the useless continuous AF for vloggers of the GX80/85, as one can see in any amateur review. Goodbye!

Good riddance to ya!

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2016 at 13:12 UTC
In reply to:

Gesture: This is an article for PCNet or WikiHow. DPReview is/should be well above this level.

No this is exactly what they needed to post right after Christmas

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2016 at 16:47 UTC
In reply to:

sebastian huvenaars: Being outside with a camera in my hands helped my photography a lot. So, a train ticket to a interesting city or pair of hiking boots or something would be money well spent i guess :)

You don't need to go out of your home to take photos

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2016 at 16:46 UTC
On article Action-packed: Sony a6500 review (1129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Deso: Everyone is all like "Marginal update Sony, OMG!" and here I am sitting full of excitement because I can finally replace my old and slow Canon EOS M haha!

I think (and hope) I'm going to be blown away when I receive my pre-order.
Also, the EOS M was a budget option at the time, but when you know the camera you can get some nice results.
Might keep it for wide-angle shots (11-22mm) because you know, the wide angle for E-mount is like 900 euro's :/

Dude you could have replaced your M with a M5 for a lot less already!

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2016 at 10:24 UTC
On article Action-packed: Sony a6500 review (1129 comments in total)
In reply to:

ABM Barry: Pro's ..You said high quality jpegs and RAW. (Lets not loose sales for your parent company!)
Con's You said colour issues in jpeg and the loss of details due to lossy compression in RAW! ??????
What's it to be DPR, Are you a truthful and real evaluation site that we can depend on.
Or, ... an advertising arm posing?

DPR You need to make a decision which side you are on and which game you are really playing.

Your reviews are getting worse, since you were bought (sold your soul ) you have certainly sunk quite low in the credibility stakes. We may as well just look at the proliferation of self proclaimed reviewers on YouTube, in most cases there isn't much differences and in some instances, DPR is quite a way short these days.
It's a real pity, DPR used to be a good trustworthy source, ... now just an advertising site.

DPR has stated many times that amazon is not involved with their editorial or information operations. They handle the ads you see that's all.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2016 at 10:22 UTC
Total: 890, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »