RedFox88

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007

Comments

Total: 1449, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony a7 III Review (1240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pritzl: Just a quick question to DPR staff regarding this quote:

"In continuous autofocus, lenses focus at shooting aperture - so shooting moving objects while stopped down robs the AF system of light - could result in missed shots"

I've seen this with the X-T2 as well and, coming from DSLRs, it caught me by surprise. Is there a technical reason for this on mirrorless cameras? e.g. is it in order to maintain the WYSIWYG view?

Slrs could focus not wide open too, but don't for focusing speed and accuracy! Seems like sony wants to update the rules without understanding the reason for the rules!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 16:58 UTC

Design fail!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 16:53 UTC as 3rd comment

So this is really touch up software not content aware. The objects appeared in the pictures do the software knew what was there. If they took a picture that had someone wearing dark sunglasses or a mask, their program would not work st all!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 10:19 UTC as 17th comment
On article Sony a7 III Review (1240 comments in total)
In reply to:

LessMirrored19: these are the last 11 gold awarded cameras :

April 5 : Fuji GFX
april 11 : Panasonic gh5
may 3 : canon 800D
June 14 : Sony A9
October 16 : Nikon D850
October 24 : Fuji XE-3
November 6 : Canon M100
November 16 : Sony RX10 IV
November 22 : Sony A7riii
February 5 : Panasonic gh5s

today : Sony A7iii

We have :
4 sonys , 2 fujis , 2 canon , 2 Pana , 1 Nikon ...
or
9 mirrorless cameras and only 2 DSLRs

very interesting ...
good day.

No, camera ratings here are still compared and rated to cameras in its class that are recent.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2018 at 20:23 UTC
On article Sony a7 III Review (1240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Erk1024: The one paragraph description of the Canon 6Dm2 didn't mention the most bizarre thing about it, that all the focus points are densely packed in the center. This is a big difference between DSLR's and the new Sony's, and it's extreme in the case of the 6D2 because they used an aps-c focus unit on a FF camera.

You need a better perspective on SLR autofocus point layouts since autofocus was invented

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2018 at 20:19 UTC
On article Taking your drone to a wedding? Read this first (86 comments in total)

With The commercial FAA sUAV license, you cannot fly it over people. Only the UAV team can be under it. All others must be inside buildings or in stationary vehicles

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2018 at 10:39 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

Mariano Pacifico: Photo Printer? Seriously? Who prints photos when they can email or text it ... Canon is slow to change ... Photo printer ! I have not printed pictures for years! Can't remember even if I did. HAVE YOU?

My photoalbum is in my phone !

Printing is still popular in Japan where many don't own a computer but have a digital camera

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2018 at 17:26 UTC

As if anyone still uses Adobe subscription 🤣

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2018 at 10:22 UTC as 5th comment
On article Opinion: the Sony a7 III could be the new Nikon D750 (1226 comments in total)
In reply to:

semorg: Is that banding in the last image?

There is either a very strange light on her skin or there is some major banding on the image:

https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/8168463667/DSC01875.acr.jpeg

Bands are circular, you (and most others) really mean pattern noise

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2018 at 10:44 UTC
In reply to:

solarider: These are 'phones' or portable telephones. Call quality doesn't make it into the data points.

Mine is a phone, not sure what world you're in.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 20:11 UTC
In reply to:

ozturert: When phones were reasonably priced, I also used to say "phone is always with me so I can buy a good phone with a good camera".
Now the high-end phones are so ridiculously expensive that you can buy a good phone and an excellent pocket size camera for the same price.
1000+ USD is way too much to pay for a good photo.

So a 5 year old phone is slow and small and has a poor battery and probably not getting security updates

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 20:10 UTC
In reply to:

stevo23: I just don't care. I have a smartphone that does all the things I need and does them well enough. Done. Life goes on.

You cared enough to reply with a comment that adds nothing to the discussion 🤔🙄

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 20:07 UTC
In reply to:

photoaddict: I only use iPhones because they have way much better operating system and the other features are as competitive as others. I am same with MacOS. I only buy Macs because they run MacOS which is far better than any other operating systems overall and they can run non-Mac operating systems as well.

The UX matters more than many people realize.

That's because the iPhone 5 is very old. Much advances to hardware and iOS. I wasn't impressed with iPhone 4 but was with the 6 and am sold on them now.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 20:06 UTC
In reply to:

maxz: I like my phone as a phone because it has a good quality camera. So yes, I WILL buy a phone simply because it has a better camera.

Glad you can see the marginal differences. On a big desktop computer monitor I yet at 150%, eh?

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 20:03 UTC
In reply to:

chrisno: call it smart device. its not just a phone

Not gonna happen. We're too far in. Just like it's called a cell phone when "cellular " isn't part of how it receives calls anymore

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 20:01 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: You mean, if a phone is a lousy phone but it gets the highest DxO score, I shouldn't buy it?

Yes

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 19:59 UTC
In reply to:

digiart: I will buy the phone I want not the phone someone wants me to buy! Sorry, but this article has very suspicious timing! Now that the iPhone has been clearly beaten in the camera department (by Huawei), all of a sudden somehow a camera review site advises us not to buy "the phone with the best camera"? ! Yeah, right...

Dude, unless you plan on using the phone solely for taking photos to immediately upload to an app for sharing, get the phone you like as an overall device better. Why? You'll be using it far more as "not a camera". Just like you don't buy the laptop because it has the best webcam if you use webcam a small percentage of the time.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 19:59 UTC
On article Report: Chinese company Xiaomi may purchase GoPro (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike Davis: Yay! Lower prices!

...because it will be the Chinese product with the GoPro name slapped on it

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2018 at 22:41 UTC
On article Canon EOS M50 Review (1277 comments in total)
In reply to:

dansclic: Buying a camera with 10 pros and eleven cons is nonsense

DPR always has a list of cons equal to the pro list. It's a joke that not having USB charging is listed as a Con

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2018 at 22:46 UTC
In reply to:

vscd: @FUJI
That's not Kayzen! Acros Neopan is an awesome film... please keep it. Look at Kodak, coming back after a few years takes more money then to keep a few meters coming out every month. I think it's very shorteyed, look at your Success on Instax. Nobody though something like Polaroid would be interesting anymore. Now it's a hype.

They are fujifilm not fuji

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2018 at 20:32 UTC
Total: 1449, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »