kewlguy

kewlguy

Lives in Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia
Joined on Oct 18, 2004

Comments

Total: 298, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Aroart: I find it amusing that people will hate this camera because of no 4k and those same people would not need or use 4k to its full benefits .... but a real film maker Casey Neistat uses a 70d for most of his vlogging...This is a you tube vloggers dream come true camera...

the rants over no-4K thing is getting lame

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 05:05 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2652 comments in total)

I left Pentax and regrettably sold my Limited lenses 8 years ago but I still have plenty of Takumar M42 and A lenses. Would love to have the K-1!!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 02:26 UTC as 585th comment | 1 reply
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2652 comments in total)
In reply to:

MarwanGhazi: too late and unprepared to join the competition.

@MarwanGhazi - OTOH, you are ready for some fanboy competiton.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 02:24 UTC
In reply to:

micke69: Ricoh obviously has no clue what its customers want. First they release a follow up model that is basically the same as the old one, then they make an anniversary model that is even worse by being shiny and conspicuous. The very thing the typical user wouldn't want!

Psst...Ricoh is trying to attract Leica users.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 00:35 UTC

Oh wow Ricoh just pulled a Leica!!

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 00:34 UTC as 45th comment | 2 replies
On article Pocketable APS-C: Fujifilm X70 real-world samples (253 comments in total)
In reply to:

kewlguy: I'm sure the X70 is a good camera but these samples are just ugly. Many not well exposed, not carefully taken photos. Pity, maybe because it's not a sony, no oh Wow kinda thing ;)

Nahh, I stand corrected. If they want to show high iso performance, at least find real low light situation. Who underexposes and shoots high iso in broad daylight? At least repeat the same scene from iso200 to iso800 for the sake of comparison. Lenstip, photozone, all take better sample shots, they just don't provide the raw, too bad.

@Greynerd - those photos look like normal circumstances - if you never shoot with other than a mobile phone.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 14:50 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 release moved to early March (71 comments in total)
In reply to:

bubblyboo: Looks like the A6300 scared both Nikon and Fuji.
/s

Why would d500 and Xpro2 be afraid of a toy from just another division of PSP maker?

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 10:42 UTC
In reply to:

heypek: to me fuji-customers have to wait two years to get their fuji-camera complete with things other Producers had alredy done long time ago... think!

Of course many fanboys prefer the Sony way - upgrade the firmware with the new camera altogether...

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 10:40 UTC
On article Pocketable APS-C: Fujifilm X70 real-world samples (253 comments in total)
In reply to:

drivecancel: You can also pocket the X100 which has a VF so would still be my choice over these cameras.

It is indeed funny to walk around with a D5 in your pocket, don't you think?

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 10:38 UTC
On article Pocketable APS-C: Fujifilm X70 real-world samples (253 comments in total)
In reply to:

gbdz: There is nothing wrong with the picture quality, so it seems.
The question is why would anybody buy this camera when the pocketable Sony is so clearly superior in all possible aspects?

Which sony? Maybe the specs mean nothing to some people LOL

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 10:36 UTC
On article Pocketable APS-C: Fujifilm X70 real-world samples (253 comments in total)

I'm sure the X70 is a good camera but these samples are just ugly. Many not well exposed, not carefully taken photos. Pity, maybe because it's not a sony, no oh Wow kinda thing ;)

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 08:40 UTC as 30th comment | 8 replies

Wow. What?

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 13:34 UTC as 74th comment
In reply to:

gil: The A6000 is already a killer for hummingbird BIFs (short distances up to 20 feet) and this one improves on the AF. The possibilities are exciting but the cost is not (gear + collateral costs of making the wife receptive to the purchase).

If you throw well, you could easily kill the bird from 20ft, yes.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 22:00 UTC
In reply to:

BPD7: Too bad their lens lineup SUCKS.

I'll stick to my Fuji with amazing lenses

Exactly my thought, too

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:59 UTC
On article Sigma 20mm F1.4 'Art' lens real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robert Holloway: Maybe it's me and this is not a comment about the Sigma. I just don't see the need for 20mm f1.4 . Can someone explain where this lens would have a real practical use. Astrophotography? Not really something I'd think of for portraits. landscapes at f1.4? Thanks!

More light?

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 21:23 UTC

I was tricked by adobe, I guess. I purchased the stand alone LR6, installed it on 2 computers, then my son needs a LR so I thought why not subscribe the CC? After I subscribed the CC, adobe blends both LR6 and CC into one. So I ended up paying twice and still have only two computers with LR...

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 03:03 UTC as 31st comment | 3 replies

Leica is more a living fossil than the pandas.

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 23:19 UTC as 38th comment | 1 reply
On article History Repeating: Olympus PEN-F Review (1068 comments in total)

$1200. Expensive toy

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 12:58 UTC as 267th comment | 4 replies
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (159 comments in total)

I don't get the rich russian heritage thing, I thought the original design was by Zeiss? There are copies of 50/2 and 50/1.5 from russia, doesn't make them russian heritage ;)

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 22:26 UTC as 11th comment
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marksphoto: Screw this, how difficult is it to make af lenses?

I own a helios 55/2.0 lens and I tried it on 5d mk2, super sharp lens, great contrast, but I think I paid $5 for it at the flea market... I would never have paid $10 for it because there is no af.

right, esp because you can get a sharp AF lens for $10.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 22:19 UTC
Total: 298, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »