kewlguy

kewlguy

Joined on Oct 18, 2004

Comments

Total: 415, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

NIkon 1 is FF then

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2017 at 23:03 UTC as 128th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

MannyZero: "..Grimm states that he knows the deputy who shot him"
-Hey, Jake, working late?
-Is that you Andy?...pop, pop!!
-Damn you, Jake, you shot me...!!
-I only grazed you because I know you, Andy.
-Fine, Jake. I hope you won't lose your job.

That's what's called friendly fire.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2017 at 23:00 UTC
On article Canon unveils stabilized EF 85mm F1.4L lens (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

kewlguy: Canon knows how to make people stick with its sucking sensors! The 85 is very interesting

Can't even make jokes here without the Canon-talibans coming at you 😁

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2017 at 01:43 UTC
On article Canon unveils stabilized EF 85mm F1.4L lens (530 comments in total)

Canon knows how to make people stick with its sucking sensors! The 85 is very interesting

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2017 at 10:06 UTC as 55th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

landscaper1: Such limited editions of cameras are the ultimate expression of wearing a camera as just so much bling. Disgusting.

some prefer a Patek P., some diamond necklace, some....an RF camera

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 23:00 UTC
In reply to:

Arca45Swiss: If fifteen grand isn't totally insane what would be?

sixteen grand

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 22:59 UTC
In reply to:

Franz Weber: Chuck Norris took some photos of a eclipse in the late 70s with the Millenium Falcon passing by... with a Polaroid camera

I heard he forgot to load the camera but the picture still came out nice.

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2017 at 08:52 UTC
On article Canon EOS Rebel SL2 / EOS 200D Review (440 comments in total)
In reply to:

Saurat: 'Entry-level' or not, cameras such as this are perfectly good for the majority of photographers - including pros - shooting stationary or slow moving subjects in daylight. Remember that next time you pay two grand for a camera full of features you will ever use.

Very likely too this camera has better DR than 6D2 ;)

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2017 at 13:40 UTC
On article Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review (1105 comments in total)
In reply to:

Arca45Swiss: I think the sample photos within the article are TERRIBLE

they are taken with the 6D2, how do you expect them any good?

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 22:54 UTC
In reply to:

AndersSJ: Just another opportunity to flash my Leica.

I thought you voluntarily asked the security to scan your Leica out from the bag before the new TSA regulation...

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 05:17 UTC
In reply to:

Bodhi Dharma Zen: Ok guys, I was waiting for this camera to upgrade from my 80D, I want a full frame, but have absolutely HATED the stupidly low DR from canon cameras for almost ten years now. When I got the 80D I was excited to FINALLY see an improvement on DR over all other canon cameras, I really had good hopes in to them FINALLY getting a nice FF with as much DR as the Sony sensors. Obviously, they care more about not spending money than in to thinking in the consumer. So, fffuck canon.

Which camera do you recommend me if I have canon lenses? Im gravitating towards a Sony, unsure in to which one. Im thinking in spending £2,000.00 or less if possible. THANKS!!!

should be the 5D4, but it's not cheap. If not in a hurry, wait a bit for the new Sony A7iii.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2017 at 15:39 UTC

No big deal. The main purpose of a leica is hanging on your neck while walking down the street. Just take photo with the P10.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2017 at 10:27 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

mario loconte: This test is usefully useless, if you want a cheap camera, here we are, if you want more, you spend more.

But, cheap and good, extreme DR nerd test apart, this is a worthwhile camera.

This camera is neither cheap nor good.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2017 at 09:21 UTC
In reply to:

BokehFanatic: Meanwhile, half of the potential buyers (≠internet non-buying complainers) don't know what dynamic range is, get the camera and are extremely happy with it.

Having said that, if it was not for the Canon "authority" and marketing, they would be at least as happy with a Nikon or Sony.

If they don't know being ripped off, how could they suffer?

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2017 at 01:38 UTC
In reply to:

Couscousdelight: For cheaper than a 6DII you can have a Pentax K-1, and it gives you :

36Mpxl
14Ev od dynamic
IBIS + pixel shift
35 cross Af points
A rugged body adapted for most situations.
And many more...

K1's AF is not slow. I use both Canon and Pentax FF...

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 08:42 UTC
In reply to:

D135ima: А ведь могла получится отличная камера. Все для кого 5D4 был слишком дорогим и излишне репортажным, ждали её.
Господи, это ведь прямо как мой 5d2, мои родные шумы при обработке.
Впервые сенсор с подобными характеристиками появился в 1DsIII, по правде говоря, она была заточена под низкие исо и ДД на исо 100 там даже выше. 10 лет ! Совершенно не имеет значения для кого по мнению кэнон эта камера, за 10 лет эту характеристику должно было "случайно зацепить". Ну не бывает такого в мире технологий. И нельзя выкатывать в 2017ом году ФФ, который по способности сохранять после обработки качественную картинку с низкими шумами, чистыми текстурами с честным разрешением уступает какому-то никоновскому кропу типа д5200, который наверное сейчас можно с молотка долларов за 250-300 взять. Ну блин нельзя ! Тем более это ФФ, медленный, любительский ФФ - единственное что от него требуется - это качество изображения

So true. Oh wait

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 05:58 UTC
In reply to:

ShaiKhulud: I hope they will fix SOMETHING in the future software updates. That lifted shadows ISO 100 picture is awful.

I'm sure that same firmware fix will magically grow a battery grip on it too!

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 05:52 UTC
In reply to:

beavertown: Dpreview: "6D Mark II dynamic range falls behind modern APS-C cameras"

Including Canon's own APS-C cameras? That is embarrassing.

yes, Canon's own APS-C.... that's tragic LOL

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 05:40 UTC
In reply to:

thx1138: So under $1K 77D camera gets a sensors that blows this away at low ISO. As a Canon users I'm simply gobsmacked and disgusted they would foist this garbage on us in 2017 when they all but assured us they have moved to on-chip ADC for all sensors. I'm so glad I needed the AF capabilities of the 5D4 and wasn't waiting expecting big things from 6DII. Add to that no 4K and no joystick despite 45 AF points, I'd buy a D500 or E-M1 II over this let alone it's FF competition. Wow A7III and D760 will kick the living stuffing out of this in most areas.

Good one Canon nice double shot gun blast to your own head.

77D? Even the T7i has more DR and the shadow areas lift up nicer than the 6D2.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 05:30 UTC

What a true retro camera!

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 04:59 UTC as 354th comment
Total: 415, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »