kewlguy

kewlguy

Lives in Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia
Joined on Oct 18, 2004

Comments

Total: 374, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Pentax 645Z vs Hasselblad X1D (340 comments in total)
In reply to:

jaxson: Love to see a comparison with the Pentax K-1, with its pixelshift mode for static landscapes. Pentax really has all the sensor size bases covered 👍🏻

As a K1 user, let me tell you 'static landscapes' are very rare.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 11:38 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Nikon D70 (220 comments in total)

Why are the samples nicer with this camera? ;)

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 00:38 UTC as 49th comment | 5 replies

The new Samsung Galaxy Fireball

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 05:24 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm X-T20 Review (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

mikey fried: "but for a $900 camera, most people will be very satisfied with the output."

What have things come to that this huge amount of money is regarded as a reason to expect lower quality, especially when there are cheaper (lumix) cameras available that provide excellence for less.

I have a m4/3 Lumix. Nope, it doesn't compare well in term of DR and noise to anything APS-C.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2017 at 13:09 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 Review (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

MarkInDallas: To everyone who has purchased an x-t20, or potentially reviewing one, please turn down the high ISO noise reduction to -2. It results in MUCH more pleasant results at any ISO over 1600.

MUCH sharper and the trade off of a tiny bit more noise is well worth it. I am not sure why fuji chose for it to be so aggressive at the base setting, but I would imagine it will be addressed in a future firmware update.

Other than that, as an owner of an X-T20 upgrading from an X-E1, I could not be more happy. It produces absolutely terrific results, especially with the 56/1.2.

I always set the high ISO NR to the lowest value, much more natural look :)

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2017 at 13:07 UTC

Question is, how did decentered lenses make their way to the hand of the buyers? I've had bad samples of 24-105, 24-70 L II, 24 tse and 70-200L ii. Canon did replace them though.

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2017 at 22:03 UTC as 45th comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (742 comments in total)
In reply to:

davev8: i stopped reading when i read X-trans

Dave, you did not notice the noise and DR differences between both? I use Iridient, no problems.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 00:30 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (742 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thematic: soft

perky

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 00:26 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (742 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hellraiser: The lens is a bit outdated. Time to bump its specs a bit? f1.8?

seriously, what Sony sharpness?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 00:26 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (742 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mateus1: Nice camera but... same old soft lens at F2 and portraiture distances, no distance marks on the lens, stupid placement of AF-L/AE-L buttons (too far from the thumb - it useless for back AF focusing) and Q button too, and same hopeless 4 years old eyepiece without eyecup attachement.

Hope X-E3 will not have these issues.

the portrait samples look sharp to me

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 00:24 UTC
On article Nine tips to help you win at photography competitions (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mihai Muntean: #10 Find yourself in situations of great human suffering and be sure to have at least one person crying in your shot...

Shoot that scene with a RF camera too, red dot preferably - top award material.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2017 at 17:14 UTC
In reply to:

Derek Dean: A lovely group of sample images that do a fine job of showcasing this lens. Well done.

Yes, the set of images shows NOT to use the lens at the long end. Very informative at that.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2017 at 00:19 UTC
In reply to:

villagranvicent: What exactly is a Leica-Style portrait?

Plus plenty of spherical aberration and low contrast coating, voila!

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 04:42 UTC

Finally, a true leica camera

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 04:40 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On article Leica SL Review (1089 comments in total)
In reply to:

OlyPent: Reviewing Leica is like the auto magazines that constantly review $500,000 cars. Next to zero of the readers will ever own one, but it's interesting to read about them.

especially if it's a $500K car that runs slower than a Toyota.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 09:14 UTC
On article Leica SL Review (1089 comments in total)
In reply to:

skanter: Fixed LCD - useless camera. I would not use this on the street if it were free, let alone $7500.

Skanter, with that size and price, you're an easy prey on the street, but the SL also works wonder as a self defense tool

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 09:12 UTC
On article Leica SL Review (1089 comments in total)
In reply to:

jackspra: Ignoring comments and review,for me the camera shots were fabulous. MF like.

Which MF: Manual Focus, Medium Format, (add yours)....

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 09:10 UTC
On article Leica SL Review (1089 comments in total)
In reply to:

Foveonite: Not even a bronze award... lol

Leica only deserves the Platinum award, which DPR doesn't have.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 09:06 UTC
On article Leica SL Review (1089 comments in total)
In reply to:

garyknrd: Sounds like a Pentax review. Except for the price?

the K-1 has better sensor, the SL got the red dot. Your choice.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 09:04 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: I'll just stick to my 18-55mm "kit" lens. Perfect size, build, OIS, good optics (if you get a good copy).

Elliot, 'good copy' and 'bad copy' apply to all brands. I've got bad samples from Zeiss (ZE 25/2, ZF 35/2), Canon (many 24-70 L II), Pentax (DFA 28-105, DFA 24-70, DA 35/2.4), Sigma (new 85 Art was severely decentered and replaced) and Fuji 18-55. It's common these days. Some will notice, some won't. The best way to tell is shoot cityscape/landscape and set the focus at infinity mark - see if the left/right part of the frame has equal sharpness.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 03:44 UTC
Total: 374, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »