krassphoto

krassphoto

Lives in United States NY/NJ, United States
Works as a dental lab owner/technician
Joined on Sep 24, 2006
About me:

Enjoying taking pictures and videos and collecting/restoring vintage film cameras.

Comments

Total: 64, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Dave C 150: Can it make phone calls as well?

I use Whatsapp too, but I thought it's a texting! :)))

Link | Posted on May 25, 2016 at 03:49 UTC
In reply to:

Dave C 150: Can it make phone calls as well?

LOL. Who makes phone calls today? If you want to contact someone between taking pictures, you text!

Link | Posted on May 23, 2016 at 03:24 UTC

Interesting... Fuji developed a fancy-shmancy sensor that is used by Panasonic, but in their own camera they use an outdated sensor from Sony...

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 03:18 UTC as 36th comment | 3 replies
On article Design, looks and desire: Olympus does it again (397 comments in total)
In reply to:

krassphoto: C'mon, Olympus! It would've been a complete killer if you added an optical viewfinder! It is begging to be there!

Desert Rose, there's a picture of X-100 right above in this article.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 18:03 UTC
On article Design, looks and desire: Olympus does it again (397 comments in total)

C'mon, Olympus! It would've been a complete killer if you added an optical viewfinder! It is begging to be there!

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 02:58 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (159 comments in total)

Are they sure? $649 US Dollars? Not Rubles?

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 02:21 UTC as 28th comment
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

AndroC: US$649 for a modern copy of a Jupiter? Get a camera with one at an op shop for $2. Or buy an original on ebay for $10, including camera. Sheer exploitation of Gen XYZ from Lomography. Unbelievable. I can only echo all the other similar responses.

I highly doubt that one can find an old f/1.5 Jupiter on ebay for $10. But, I agree, $649 is kind of... unreal..

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 02:18 UTC
In reply to:

krassphoto: If you are a serious photographer, but can't resist selfies, this camera is for you! :)

I agree, articulating screen is very helpful for angled shots and video, I use it a lot on my GH1 and FZ1000. But 180º tilt... they should've made it swivel.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2016 at 04:28 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2481 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: 'faux leather'

Stopped reading right there. Goodbye Fuji, you won't be missed.

You definitely won't be missed by Fuji either. Btw, just curious, what brand of cameras do you wear?

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 16:37 UTC

If you are a serious photographer, but can't resist selfies, this camera is for you! :)

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 15:24 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2481 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Insane price. I have a X-E1 but recently got a Panasonic GX7 because I want IBIS and A7IIs are out of my price range. Wow that Panasonic is fast. Fast AF, fast manual setting and overall just feel much more responsive than the X-E1 on latest firmware.

For $1700, that's quite a bit of premium to the $1100 GX8 which have IBIS, 4K and touchscreen.

I have an X-E2 and Panasonic FZ1000 and old but good hacked GH1, plus Canon 7D, and I agree with you 100%! The price is absolutely unjustified. With all due respect and love to Fuji.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 02:49 UTC
In reply to:

DaveClark: No stabilization renders the video mode useless. I got rid of my X100 because the video was horrible. I got a Sony RX100M3 to replace it because it had better video and I could shoot handheld at lower ISO due to stabilization. I tested both cameras side by side and in most cases the Sony did just as well because of lower ISO. I might have considered the X-E2S, but not now.

Who buys Fuji for video, anyway?

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 02:42 UTC

I'm so happy I didn't sell my XE2! And in Feb, when it turns into a practically new camera (for free), I will be even happier! Thank you, Fuji!

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 02:36 UTC as 13th comment
On article 2015 Roundup: Interchangeable Lens Cameras $800-$1200 (159 comments in total)

No Fuji??

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2015 at 02:36 UTC as 49th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

magneto shot: just shoot film guys. i was having a real blast doing it in between digital.
check out http://marcuslowphotos.com/2015/09/

Totally agree! And if Fuji made a decently priced 35mm rangefinder now, I'd buy it in a heartbeat!

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2015 at 03:36 UTC

:) I still have my 1st digital cam - Minolta A1 :) It came with 256mb CF card! Still working!

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2015 at 21:32 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

nikon power: #1, #3, #4 say "life is full of agony and unhappiness."
#2 tells child porn lovers "download me."

I guess Louvre, Vatican, Uffizi are childporn lovers' Mecca...

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2015 at 16:41 UTC

Speaks a lot of the Chinese granite quality... :)

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2015 at 01:32 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

skytripper: Why in heaven's name would anyone with half a brain want to look at photos of this monster? Truly creepy!

You looked , then you have less than a half... You don't like it, don't look, don't speak for everyone.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2015 at 19:14 UTC
In reply to:

MysteryLemon: I just don't get it.

I didn't get it with Sony's offerings either.

If you want a camera better than your phone, get a camera, don't merge a camera lens and phone body to make some god awful mutant camera that will perform worse and be an ergonomic nightmare...

Many years ago people were saying the same about still photo snd video in one body...

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2015 at 16:52 UTC
Total: 64, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »