JOrmsby

Lives in United States OR, United States
Has a website at www.orogenyphotography.com
Joined on Sep 27, 2011

Comments

Total: 51, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

JOrmsby: I'm not a Sony shooter, but how many FE primes do they need in the 85-100mm range? 85 1.4, 85 1.8, 90 2.8, and 100 2.8. Meanwhile E-mount is still stuck with hardly anything, not to mention other missing FE focal lengths.

Tequila MockingjayBird, so the E-mount 16-70 f/4 works well on an A7R then, right? No difference between crop sensor lenses (E mount) and full frame (FE) ones?

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2017 at 13:07 UTC

I'm not a Sony shooter, but how many FE primes do they need in the 85-100mm range? 85 1.4, 85 1.8, 90 2.8, and 100 2.8. Meanwhile E-mount is still stuck with hardly anything, not to mention other missing FE focal lengths.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2017 at 04:14 UTC as 20th comment | 9 replies
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)

I wish Nikon would add IBIS, 4K and a tilt-screen to the D7300. Nice job Pentax.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 00:28 UTC as 151st comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)
In reply to:

JOrmsby: Nikon really needs to step up its game when they release the D7300 and add IBIS like Pentax has. Nice feature set on this one, kudos Pentax!

I agree the D7200 is a great camera, but specifically what I meant was that I wish Nikon would add IBIS and 4K to the D7300. Perhaps also make the grip deeper and add a tilt screen too and they'd have the perfect DSLR for me.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 00:27 UTC
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)

Nikon really needs to step up its game when they release the D7300 and add IBIS like Pentax has. Nice feature set on this one, kudos Pentax!

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 23:12 UTC as 178th comment | 5 replies
On article Canon EOS M5 real-world sample gallery (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ian Leach: It is amazing how differently people think. I like test photos to show the capabilities of the camera/lens, I’m happy to take the photographers skill for granted. Once again there is no Seattle roof tops scene and once again I am moaning about it. It tests the lens corner to corner and close to far. I realize sharpness everywhere is not for all, but would it be so difficult to include such shots for those who care?

I agree with OP in that it would be very useful to see more lens tests done. Especially for the EOS-M system which doesn't get a lot of coverage from other lens review sites. But I've been eager for more lens tests from a quality source like preview for awhile. Plenty of lenses out there to cover that slip through the cracks of other sites.

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2016 at 20:32 UTC
On article Fujifilm launches X-A10 as entry-level X-series model (166 comments in total)

Is this the same Sony 16mp sensor that was in the Nikon D5100 and D7000?

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 21:39 UTC as 50th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

justmeMN: Olympus' camera-imaging division has lost money for seven years in a row, so the company can't be accused of being greedy. :-)

We hear this retort often enough, and frankly, it's Olympus' business problem. Most other camera companies are profitable (maybe less so than years past), yet Oly is the one always losing money. Clearly they need to restructure their costs and work to lower those.
I look at a company like Sigma who is making some of the best glass on the planet at very reasonable prices, and still making money doing it, without being greedy.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 19:24 UTC
In reply to:

JOrmsby: Just lost my love for Olympus...

Their pricing has been pretty arrogant lately. Mostly with this one and the PEN-F. Perhaps the 12-100 and 50 1.2 could be considered a bit steep as well, IMO.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 16:29 UTC

Just lost my love for Olympus...

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 15:12 UTC as 86th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Sabud: USD2000:-, I'm not the slightest surprised. This is a professionel camera intended to be used with Olympus very expensive premium lenses. With other words, not for everybody;)

There will be other upgrades................

The D500 is also a professional camera and it's currently listed at $1800. Not much advantage with the Oly for $200 more...

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 15:11 UTC

It's funny they show it with the 24-70 GM lens. I wish they actually had a GM 16-55 f/2.8 for E-Mount instead.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 18:00 UTC as 175th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

JOrmsby: Sweet. Now if they'd make a 16-55 f/2.8 GM to go with it I'd switch to Sony.

It does seem like a nice lens, but I really don't want to have to deal with the added size, cost, weight of an adapter. This new camera has some pretty professional features, they should at least offer a dedicated 'pro' quality standard lens for it.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 17:27 UTC

Sweet. Now if they'd make a 16-55 f/2.8 GM to go with it I'd switch to Sony.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 16:00 UTC as 243rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

JOrmsby: I wish more of the lens companies would offer a fast macro in the 90-105mm (equivalent) range. Other than this new Voit, there's nothing except for the Zeiss Milvus 100 f/2. No autofocus versions. Having a lens in that focal length that can double as fast portrait (faster than 2.8) and macro would be incredibly versatile.

Wow I wasn't aware of the Tamron, thanks for the heads up! It would be awesome if they added VC and updated the body to the new SP line. Will keep an eye on it.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 04:51 UTC

I wish more of the lens companies would offer a fast macro in the 90-105mm (equivalent) range. Other than this new Voit, there's nothing except for the Zeiss Milvus 100 f/2. No autofocus versions. Having a lens in that focal length that can double as fast portrait (faster than 2.8) and macro would be incredibly versatile.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 00:02 UTC as 19th comment | 3 replies
On article Fast and light: Nikkor 24mm F1.8G ED lens review (159 comments in total)

I love these lens reviews and comparisons. Really wish dpreview would do a lot more of them.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 15:00 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply

I'm interested in this lens and agree with others this is a lackluster first gallery, but don't get all the people whining about how it's slow at f/4. You realize it comes with up to 6.5 stops of image stabilization, right? Have you every used IS on a m4/3's? It's unbelievably useful in my experience. If you really need shallow depth of field, you probably don't need a zoom (much less superzoom) to begin with.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2016 at 19:29 UTC as 49th comment | 1 reply

No OS on the 85mm, I'm bummed. Think I'll be happier with the Tamron 85 with VC, and less $ and lower weight.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 18:46 UTC as 64th comment | 4 replies

Any idea if it's 14-bit, or still just 12-bit?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 17:25 UTC as 145th comment | 4 replies
Total: 51, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »