QuietSwede

I'm especially here for the "why would anyone buy such a big and heavy camera. The phones are so good these days!" comments

'Better' is a word that needs to be defined. It's a matter of personal taste - some prefer one, some the other, and thus it is 'better'. Perhaps some find the digital media has made photos too ...

...so does Nikon, like every other camera maker, and by some considered doing it better than Sony.

Where's the logic in that reasoning? If Sonys sensors are the best available, then why wouldn't you buy them? Like Nikon for example. And you also forgot the sensor design part, which is just as...

What's the halo-effect in this one?

There are many "non-pro" lenses with great image quality. I don't think the term "pro" refers to image quality.

Placed 91^st in the challenge.

Very niche indeed! I have the Sigma 150, and however much I like it it's an odd focal length for most other than insects. Not profitable is my guess.

That is true.

I'm pretty sure it has to do with patents.

I really can't see anything wrong with Nikon colors.

But you said it was on your Z6 sensor. The D600 has a mirror.

Oil in a mirrorless body? This sounds really odd, especially as I have never seen a ny reports on this before in the Z6.

The most important update with this new computer is that they went back to the old keyboard? Apple of today.

Middle aged men complaining in forums is ok though.